Cargando…

Utility and Feasibility of Removing Surgical Staples from the Remnant Stomach or Gastric Conduit during Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastric cancer in the remnant stomach poses some specific technical difficulties due to severe fibrosis and the presence of surgical staples. Therefore, we clarified the feasibility and safety of removing staples. METHODS: We retrospectively anal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Suzuki, Yugo, Nomura, Kosuke, Matsui, Akira, Kikuchi, Daisuke, Hoteya, Shu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Japanese Society of Internal Medicine 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10125828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36047114
http://dx.doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.9759-22
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastric cancer in the remnant stomach poses some specific technical difficulties due to severe fibrosis and the presence of surgical staples. Therefore, we clarified the feasibility and safety of removing staples. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed ESD outcomes of cases of gastric cancer in the remnant stomach. MATERIALS: This study reviewed 227 patients who underwent ESD for gastric cancer in the remnant stomach or gastric conduit. Patients were divided into those in whom resection extended to the anastomotic site or suture line (AS group; n=90) and those without such extension (non-AS group; n=137). The AS group was further divided into cases in which staples were removed (staple group; n=22) and those in which they were not (control group; n=68). RESULTS: The rates of specimen damage and curative resection and the duration and speed of the procedure were significantly worse in the AS group than the non-AS group. There were no significant differences between the staple group and the control group in the curative or complete resection rates, and no complications occurred in the staple group. In a propensity score-matched analysis, the rate of specimen damage was significantly lower in the staple group than in the control group (p=0.002), and the procedure speed tended to be faster (p=0.077). CONCLUSION: Staple removal may improve the outcomes of ESD in patients with gastric cancer in the remnant stomach or gastric conduit by reducing the risk of specimen damage and increasing the procedure speed without complications.