Cargando…

Examining linkages among multiple sustainable development outcomes: does the productive safety net program increase on-farm agrobiodiversity?

In Ethiopia, on-farm agrobiodiversity and the Productive Safety Net Program (PSNP) play a key role in building smallholders’ resilience. However, the impact of PSNP on on-farm agrobiodiversity is not yet well investigated. In this paper, we develop an analytical framework that links PSNP participati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kozicka, M., Gotor, E., Pagnani, T., Occelli, M., Caracciolo, F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10125850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37363014
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03257-2
_version_ 1785030113682784256
author Kozicka, M.
Gotor, E.
Pagnani, T.
Occelli, M.
Caracciolo, F.
author_facet Kozicka, M.
Gotor, E.
Pagnani, T.
Occelli, M.
Caracciolo, F.
author_sort Kozicka, M.
collection PubMed
description In Ethiopia, on-farm agrobiodiversity and the Productive Safety Net Program (PSNP) play a key role in building smallholders’ resilience. However, the impact of PSNP on on-farm agrobiodiversity is not yet well investigated. In this paper, we develop an analytical framework that links PSNP participation to on-farm agrobiodiversity. Both diverse farming systems and PSNP require labour inputs while providing income stabilization, which might result in a negative relationship between the two. Conversely, higher income from PSNP might allow farmers to increase their long-term on-farm investments, as opposed to the strategies oriented toward the highest immediate profit or calorie intake outcome. We base our empirical analysis on the World Bank’s Ethiopian Socioeconomic Survey, a panel dataset encompassing nearly 3000 respondents and a Tobit model, based on Difference-in-Difference and the Propensity-Score Matching methods. We find that Ethiopia’s PSNP has a negative impact on farm labour input, both in terms of labour intensity and duration. Furthermore, our results show that participation in the program is associated, on average, with lower on-farm crop diversity. We conclude that the PSNP participation may be crowding-out production stabilizing farming activities, such as intercropping or cover cropping, that are more labour intensive. Our findings call for embedding tools in the new phase of the PSNP (2021–2025) that could incentivise on-farm resilience-oriented investments, in particular leading to higher crop diversification.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10125850
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101258502023-04-27 Examining linkages among multiple sustainable development outcomes: does the productive safety net program increase on-farm agrobiodiversity? Kozicka, M. Gotor, E. Pagnani, T. Occelli, M. Caracciolo, F. Environ Dev Sustain Article In Ethiopia, on-farm agrobiodiversity and the Productive Safety Net Program (PSNP) play a key role in building smallholders’ resilience. However, the impact of PSNP on on-farm agrobiodiversity is not yet well investigated. In this paper, we develop an analytical framework that links PSNP participation to on-farm agrobiodiversity. Both diverse farming systems and PSNP require labour inputs while providing income stabilization, which might result in a negative relationship between the two. Conversely, higher income from PSNP might allow farmers to increase their long-term on-farm investments, as opposed to the strategies oriented toward the highest immediate profit or calorie intake outcome. We base our empirical analysis on the World Bank’s Ethiopian Socioeconomic Survey, a panel dataset encompassing nearly 3000 respondents and a Tobit model, based on Difference-in-Difference and the Propensity-Score Matching methods. We find that Ethiopia’s PSNP has a negative impact on farm labour input, both in terms of labour intensity and duration. Furthermore, our results show that participation in the program is associated, on average, with lower on-farm crop diversity. We conclude that the PSNP participation may be crowding-out production stabilizing farming activities, such as intercropping or cover cropping, that are more labour intensive. Our findings call for embedding tools in the new phase of the PSNP (2021–2025) that could incentivise on-farm resilience-oriented investments, in particular leading to higher crop diversification. Springer Netherlands 2023-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10125850/ /pubmed/37363014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03257-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Kozicka, M.
Gotor, E.
Pagnani, T.
Occelli, M.
Caracciolo, F.
Examining linkages among multiple sustainable development outcomes: does the productive safety net program increase on-farm agrobiodiversity?
title Examining linkages among multiple sustainable development outcomes: does the productive safety net program increase on-farm agrobiodiversity?
title_full Examining linkages among multiple sustainable development outcomes: does the productive safety net program increase on-farm agrobiodiversity?
title_fullStr Examining linkages among multiple sustainable development outcomes: does the productive safety net program increase on-farm agrobiodiversity?
title_full_unstemmed Examining linkages among multiple sustainable development outcomes: does the productive safety net program increase on-farm agrobiodiversity?
title_short Examining linkages among multiple sustainable development outcomes: does the productive safety net program increase on-farm agrobiodiversity?
title_sort examining linkages among multiple sustainable development outcomes: does the productive safety net program increase on-farm agrobiodiversity?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10125850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37363014
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03257-2
work_keys_str_mv AT kozickam examininglinkagesamongmultiplesustainabledevelopmentoutcomesdoestheproductivesafetynetprogramincreaseonfarmagrobiodiversity
AT gotore examininglinkagesamongmultiplesustainabledevelopmentoutcomesdoestheproductivesafetynetprogramincreaseonfarmagrobiodiversity
AT pagnanit examininglinkagesamongmultiplesustainabledevelopmentoutcomesdoestheproductivesafetynetprogramincreaseonfarmagrobiodiversity
AT occellim examininglinkagesamongmultiplesustainabledevelopmentoutcomesdoestheproductivesafetynetprogramincreaseonfarmagrobiodiversity
AT caracciolof examininglinkagesamongmultiplesustainabledevelopmentoutcomesdoestheproductivesafetynetprogramincreaseonfarmagrobiodiversity