Cargando…

Follow-up descriptive study of how proportioning marks between coursework and examination affects the performance of students in nursing

BACKGROUND: There has been little attention to how the allocation of marks affects the academic performance of students in courses. Our previous study showed that students in nursing had much lower marks in exams than coursework (tutorials and case study) in a pharmacology course. It is not known wh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Doggrell, Sheila A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10125851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37095477
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01286-w
_version_ 1785030113925005312
author Doggrell, Sheila A
author_facet Doggrell, Sheila A
author_sort Doggrell, Sheila A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There has been little attention to how the allocation of marks affects the academic performance of students in courses. Our previous study showed that students in nursing had much lower marks in exams than coursework (tutorials and case study) in a pharmacology course. It is not known whether this applies to nursing students in other courses and/or with different types of coursework. The purpose of this study was to analyse how the allocation of marks to examination and different coursework affected the performance of students in nursing in a bioscience course. METHODS: For the 379 completing students in a nursing degree undertaking a first-year first semester bioscience course, a descriptive study was undertaken of (i) the marks for the exam and two coursework components (individually undertaken laboratory skills, and a team/group project on health communication), with the marks being compared by Students t-test, (ii) any association between these marks was determined by regression line analysis, and (iii) modelling was undertaken to determine the effects of changing the allocation of marks on passing and failing rates. RESULTS: Students in nursing who completed a bioscience course had much lower marks in the exam than the coursework. Regression line analysis of the marks in the exam versus combined coursework showed (a) a poor line fit and (b) the correlation coefficient was moderate (r = 0.51), for the individual laboratory skills vs. exam was moderate (r = 0.49), but only weak for the group project on health communication vs. exam (r = 0.25). A high percentage of students passed the course (97%). Modelling showed that increasing the marks for the exam decreased the number of students passing the course to as few as 57%. CONCLUSIONS: The allocation of marks determines the percentage of students in nursing who pass courses, regardless of the type of coursework. The students in nursing in the bioscience course, who pass the course based on marks from coursework, but not the examination component, may not have the necessary knowledge to continue their program of study. Thus, requiring students in nursing to pass exams should be given further consideration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10125851
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101258512023-04-26 Follow-up descriptive study of how proportioning marks between coursework and examination affects the performance of students in nursing Doggrell, Sheila A BMC Nurs Research BACKGROUND: There has been little attention to how the allocation of marks affects the academic performance of students in courses. Our previous study showed that students in nursing had much lower marks in exams than coursework (tutorials and case study) in a pharmacology course. It is not known whether this applies to nursing students in other courses and/or with different types of coursework. The purpose of this study was to analyse how the allocation of marks to examination and different coursework affected the performance of students in nursing in a bioscience course. METHODS: For the 379 completing students in a nursing degree undertaking a first-year first semester bioscience course, a descriptive study was undertaken of (i) the marks for the exam and two coursework components (individually undertaken laboratory skills, and a team/group project on health communication), with the marks being compared by Students t-test, (ii) any association between these marks was determined by regression line analysis, and (iii) modelling was undertaken to determine the effects of changing the allocation of marks on passing and failing rates. RESULTS: Students in nursing who completed a bioscience course had much lower marks in the exam than the coursework. Regression line analysis of the marks in the exam versus combined coursework showed (a) a poor line fit and (b) the correlation coefficient was moderate (r = 0.51), for the individual laboratory skills vs. exam was moderate (r = 0.49), but only weak for the group project on health communication vs. exam (r = 0.25). A high percentage of students passed the course (97%). Modelling showed that increasing the marks for the exam decreased the number of students passing the course to as few as 57%. CONCLUSIONS: The allocation of marks determines the percentage of students in nursing who pass courses, regardless of the type of coursework. The students in nursing in the bioscience course, who pass the course based on marks from coursework, but not the examination component, may not have the necessary knowledge to continue their program of study. Thus, requiring students in nursing to pass exams should be given further consideration. BioMed Central 2023-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10125851/ /pubmed/37095477 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01286-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Doggrell, Sheila A
Follow-up descriptive study of how proportioning marks between coursework and examination affects the performance of students in nursing
title Follow-up descriptive study of how proportioning marks between coursework and examination affects the performance of students in nursing
title_full Follow-up descriptive study of how proportioning marks between coursework and examination affects the performance of students in nursing
title_fullStr Follow-up descriptive study of how proportioning marks between coursework and examination affects the performance of students in nursing
title_full_unstemmed Follow-up descriptive study of how proportioning marks between coursework and examination affects the performance of students in nursing
title_short Follow-up descriptive study of how proportioning marks between coursework and examination affects the performance of students in nursing
title_sort follow-up descriptive study of how proportioning marks between coursework and examination affects the performance of students in nursing
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10125851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37095477
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01286-w
work_keys_str_mv AT doggrellsheilaa followupdescriptivestudyofhowproportioningmarksbetweencourseworkandexaminationaffectstheperformanceofstudentsinnursing