Cargando…
Which one is better for refractory/relapsed acute B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia: Single-target (CD19) or dual-target (tandem or sequential CD19/CD22) CAR T-cell therapy?
CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has shown great success against B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). Tandem and sequential CD19/CD22 dual-target CAR T-cell therapies have been developed to reduce the possibility of CD19-negative relapse; however, the superior strategy is...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10125987/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37095120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41408-023-00819-5 |
_version_ | 1785030139729412096 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Sining Zhang, Xinyue Dai, Haiping Cui, Wei Yin, Jia Li, Zheng Yang, Xiao Yang, Chunxiu Xue, Shengli Qiu, Huiying Miao, Miao Chen, Suning Jin, Zhengming Fu, Chengcheng Li, Caixia Sun, Aining Han, Yue Wang, Ying Yu, Lei Wu, Depei Cui, Qingya Tang, Xiaowen |
author_facet | Liu, Sining Zhang, Xinyue Dai, Haiping Cui, Wei Yin, Jia Li, Zheng Yang, Xiao Yang, Chunxiu Xue, Shengli Qiu, Huiying Miao, Miao Chen, Suning Jin, Zhengming Fu, Chengcheng Li, Caixia Sun, Aining Han, Yue Wang, Ying Yu, Lei Wu, Depei Cui, Qingya Tang, Xiaowen |
author_sort | Liu, Sining |
collection | PubMed |
description | CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has shown great success against B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). Tandem and sequential CD19/CD22 dual-target CAR T-cell therapies have been developed to reduce the possibility of CD19-negative relapse; however, the superior strategy is still uncertain. This study screened 219 patients with relapsed/refractory B-ALL who were enrolled in clinical trials of either CD19 (NCT03919240) or CD19/CD22 CAR T-cell therapy (NCT03614858). The complete remission (CR) rates in the single CD19, tandem CD19/CD22, and sequential CD19/CD22 groups were 83.0% (122/147), 98.0% (50/51), and 95.2% (20/21), respectively (single CD19 vs. tandem CD19/CD22, P = 0.006). Patients with high-risk factors achieved a higher rate of CR in the tandem CD19/CD22 group than in the single CD19 group (100.0% vs. 82.4%, P = 0.017). Tandem CD19/CD22 CAR T-cell therapy was one of the significant favorable factors in the multivariate analysis of the CR rate. The incidence of adverse events was similar among the three groups. Multivariable analysis in CR patients showed that a low frequency of relapse, a low tumor burden, minimal residual disease-negative CR and bridging to transplantation were independently associated with better leukemia-free survival. Our findings suggested that tandem CD19/CD22 CAR T-cell therapy obtains a better response than CD19 CAR T-cell therapy and a similar response to sequential CD19/CD22 CAR T-cell therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10125987 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101259872023-04-26 Which one is better for refractory/relapsed acute B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia: Single-target (CD19) or dual-target (tandem or sequential CD19/CD22) CAR T-cell therapy? Liu, Sining Zhang, Xinyue Dai, Haiping Cui, Wei Yin, Jia Li, Zheng Yang, Xiao Yang, Chunxiu Xue, Shengli Qiu, Huiying Miao, Miao Chen, Suning Jin, Zhengming Fu, Chengcheng Li, Caixia Sun, Aining Han, Yue Wang, Ying Yu, Lei Wu, Depei Cui, Qingya Tang, Xiaowen Blood Cancer J Article CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has shown great success against B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). Tandem and sequential CD19/CD22 dual-target CAR T-cell therapies have been developed to reduce the possibility of CD19-negative relapse; however, the superior strategy is still uncertain. This study screened 219 patients with relapsed/refractory B-ALL who were enrolled in clinical trials of either CD19 (NCT03919240) or CD19/CD22 CAR T-cell therapy (NCT03614858). The complete remission (CR) rates in the single CD19, tandem CD19/CD22, and sequential CD19/CD22 groups were 83.0% (122/147), 98.0% (50/51), and 95.2% (20/21), respectively (single CD19 vs. tandem CD19/CD22, P = 0.006). Patients with high-risk factors achieved a higher rate of CR in the tandem CD19/CD22 group than in the single CD19 group (100.0% vs. 82.4%, P = 0.017). Tandem CD19/CD22 CAR T-cell therapy was one of the significant favorable factors in the multivariate analysis of the CR rate. The incidence of adverse events was similar among the three groups. Multivariable analysis in CR patients showed that a low frequency of relapse, a low tumor burden, minimal residual disease-negative CR and bridging to transplantation were independently associated with better leukemia-free survival. Our findings suggested that tandem CD19/CD22 CAR T-cell therapy obtains a better response than CD19 CAR T-cell therapy and a similar response to sequential CD19/CD22 CAR T-cell therapy. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10125987/ /pubmed/37095120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41408-023-00819-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Liu, Sining Zhang, Xinyue Dai, Haiping Cui, Wei Yin, Jia Li, Zheng Yang, Xiao Yang, Chunxiu Xue, Shengli Qiu, Huiying Miao, Miao Chen, Suning Jin, Zhengming Fu, Chengcheng Li, Caixia Sun, Aining Han, Yue Wang, Ying Yu, Lei Wu, Depei Cui, Qingya Tang, Xiaowen Which one is better for refractory/relapsed acute B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia: Single-target (CD19) or dual-target (tandem or sequential CD19/CD22) CAR T-cell therapy? |
title | Which one is better for refractory/relapsed acute B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia: Single-target (CD19) or dual-target (tandem or sequential CD19/CD22) CAR T-cell therapy? |
title_full | Which one is better for refractory/relapsed acute B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia: Single-target (CD19) or dual-target (tandem or sequential CD19/CD22) CAR T-cell therapy? |
title_fullStr | Which one is better for refractory/relapsed acute B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia: Single-target (CD19) or dual-target (tandem or sequential CD19/CD22) CAR T-cell therapy? |
title_full_unstemmed | Which one is better for refractory/relapsed acute B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia: Single-target (CD19) or dual-target (tandem or sequential CD19/CD22) CAR T-cell therapy? |
title_short | Which one is better for refractory/relapsed acute B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia: Single-target (CD19) or dual-target (tandem or sequential CD19/CD22) CAR T-cell therapy? |
title_sort | which one is better for refractory/relapsed acute b-cell lymphoblastic leukemia: single-target (cd19) or dual-target (tandem or sequential cd19/cd22) car t-cell therapy? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10125987/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37095120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41408-023-00819-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liusining whichoneisbetterforrefractoryrelapsedacutebcelllymphoblasticleukemiasingletargetcd19ordualtargettandemorsequentialcd19cd22cartcelltherapy AT zhangxinyue whichoneisbetterforrefractoryrelapsedacutebcelllymphoblasticleukemiasingletargetcd19ordualtargettandemorsequentialcd19cd22cartcelltherapy AT daihaiping whichoneisbetterforrefractoryrelapsedacutebcelllymphoblasticleukemiasingletargetcd19ordualtargettandemorsequentialcd19cd22cartcelltherapy AT cuiwei whichoneisbetterforrefractoryrelapsedacutebcelllymphoblasticleukemiasingletargetcd19ordualtargettandemorsequentialcd19cd22cartcelltherapy AT yinjia whichoneisbetterforrefractoryrelapsedacutebcelllymphoblasticleukemiasingletargetcd19ordualtargettandemorsequentialcd19cd22cartcelltherapy AT lizheng whichoneisbetterforrefractoryrelapsedacutebcelllymphoblasticleukemiasingletargetcd19ordualtargettandemorsequentialcd19cd22cartcelltherapy AT yangxiao whichoneisbetterforrefractoryrelapsedacutebcelllymphoblasticleukemiasingletargetcd19ordualtargettandemorsequentialcd19cd22cartcelltherapy AT yangchunxiu whichoneisbetterforrefractoryrelapsedacutebcelllymphoblasticleukemiasingletargetcd19ordualtargettandemorsequentialcd19cd22cartcelltherapy AT xueshengli whichoneisbetterforrefractoryrelapsedacutebcelllymphoblasticleukemiasingletargetcd19ordualtargettandemorsequentialcd19cd22cartcelltherapy AT qiuhuiying whichoneisbetterforrefractoryrelapsedacutebcelllymphoblasticleukemiasingletargetcd19ordualtargettandemorsequentialcd19cd22cartcelltherapy AT miaomiao whichoneisbetterforrefractoryrelapsedacutebcelllymphoblasticleukemiasingletargetcd19ordualtargettandemorsequentialcd19cd22cartcelltherapy AT chensuning whichoneisbetterforrefractoryrelapsedacutebcelllymphoblasticleukemiasingletargetcd19ordualtargettandemorsequentialcd19cd22cartcelltherapy AT jinzhengming whichoneisbetterforrefractoryrelapsedacutebcelllymphoblasticleukemiasingletargetcd19ordualtargettandemorsequentialcd19cd22cartcelltherapy AT fuchengcheng whichoneisbetterforrefractoryrelapsedacutebcelllymphoblasticleukemiasingletargetcd19ordualtargettandemorsequentialcd19cd22cartcelltherapy AT licaixia whichoneisbetterforrefractoryrelapsedacutebcelllymphoblasticleukemiasingletargetcd19ordualtargettandemorsequentialcd19cd22cartcelltherapy AT sunaining whichoneisbetterforrefractoryrelapsedacutebcelllymphoblasticleukemiasingletargetcd19ordualtargettandemorsequentialcd19cd22cartcelltherapy AT hanyue whichoneisbetterforrefractoryrelapsedacutebcelllymphoblasticleukemiasingletargetcd19ordualtargettandemorsequentialcd19cd22cartcelltherapy AT wangying whichoneisbetterforrefractoryrelapsedacutebcelllymphoblasticleukemiasingletargetcd19ordualtargettandemorsequentialcd19cd22cartcelltherapy AT yulei whichoneisbetterforrefractoryrelapsedacutebcelllymphoblasticleukemiasingletargetcd19ordualtargettandemorsequentialcd19cd22cartcelltherapy AT wudepei whichoneisbetterforrefractoryrelapsedacutebcelllymphoblasticleukemiasingletargetcd19ordualtargettandemorsequentialcd19cd22cartcelltherapy AT cuiqingya whichoneisbetterforrefractoryrelapsedacutebcelllymphoblasticleukemiasingletargetcd19ordualtargettandemorsequentialcd19cd22cartcelltherapy AT tangxiaowen whichoneisbetterforrefractoryrelapsedacutebcelllymphoblasticleukemiasingletargetcd19ordualtargettandemorsequentialcd19cd22cartcelltherapy |