Cargando…

Influence of image reconstruction on quantitative cardiac (15)O-water positron emission tomography

BACKGROUND: The impact on quantitative (15)O-water PET/CT of a wide range of different reconstruction settings, including regularized reconstruction by block-sequential regularized expectation maximization (BSREM), was investigated. METHODS: Twenty clinical stress scans from patients referred for as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nordström, Jonny, Lindström, Elin, Kero, Tanja, Sörensen, Jens, Lubberink, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10126040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35927378
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12350-022-03075-5
_version_ 1785030151704150016
author Nordström, Jonny
Lindström, Elin
Kero, Tanja
Sörensen, Jens
Lubberink, Mark
author_facet Nordström, Jonny
Lindström, Elin
Kero, Tanja
Sörensen, Jens
Lubberink, Mark
author_sort Nordström, Jonny
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The impact on quantitative (15)O-water PET/CT of a wide range of different reconstruction settings, including regularized reconstruction by block-sequential regularized expectation maximization (BSREM), was investigated. METHODS: Twenty clinical stress scans from patients referred for assessment of myocardial ischemia were included. Patients underwent a 4-min dynamic stress PET scan with (15)O-water on a digital PET/CT scanner. Twenty-two reconstructions were generated from each scan and a clinical reconstruction was used as reference. Varied parameters were number of iterations, filter, exclusion of time-of-flight and point-spread function, and regularization parameter with BSREM. Analyses were performed in aQuant utilizing two different methods and resulting regional myocardial blood flow (MBF), perfusable tissue fraction (PTF), and transmural MBF (MBFt) values were evaluated. RESULTS: Across the two analyses, correlations toward the reference reconstruction were strong for all parameters (ρ ≥ 0.83). Using automated analysis and the diagnostic threshold of hyperemic MBF at 2.3 mL⋅g(−1)⋅min(−1), diagnosis was unchanged irrespective of reconstruction method in all patients except for one, where only four of the most extreme reconstruction methods resulted in a change of diagnosis. CONCLUSION: The low sensitivity of MBF values to reconstruction method and, as previously shown, scanner type and PET/CT misalignment, confirms that diagnostic hyperemic MBF cutoff values can be consistently used for (15)O-water. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12350-022-03075-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10126040
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101260402023-04-26 Influence of image reconstruction on quantitative cardiac (15)O-water positron emission tomography Nordström, Jonny Lindström, Elin Kero, Tanja Sörensen, Jens Lubberink, Mark J Nucl Cardiol Original Article BACKGROUND: The impact on quantitative (15)O-water PET/CT of a wide range of different reconstruction settings, including regularized reconstruction by block-sequential regularized expectation maximization (BSREM), was investigated. METHODS: Twenty clinical stress scans from patients referred for assessment of myocardial ischemia were included. Patients underwent a 4-min dynamic stress PET scan with (15)O-water on a digital PET/CT scanner. Twenty-two reconstructions were generated from each scan and a clinical reconstruction was used as reference. Varied parameters were number of iterations, filter, exclusion of time-of-flight and point-spread function, and regularization parameter with BSREM. Analyses were performed in aQuant utilizing two different methods and resulting regional myocardial blood flow (MBF), perfusable tissue fraction (PTF), and transmural MBF (MBFt) values were evaluated. RESULTS: Across the two analyses, correlations toward the reference reconstruction were strong for all parameters (ρ ≥ 0.83). Using automated analysis and the diagnostic threshold of hyperemic MBF at 2.3 mL⋅g(−1)⋅min(−1), diagnosis was unchanged irrespective of reconstruction method in all patients except for one, where only four of the most extreme reconstruction methods resulted in a change of diagnosis. CONCLUSION: The low sensitivity of MBF values to reconstruction method and, as previously shown, scanner type and PET/CT misalignment, confirms that diagnostic hyperemic MBF cutoff values can be consistently used for (15)O-water. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12350-022-03075-5. Springer International Publishing 2022-08-04 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10126040/ /pubmed/35927378 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12350-022-03075-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Nordström, Jonny
Lindström, Elin
Kero, Tanja
Sörensen, Jens
Lubberink, Mark
Influence of image reconstruction on quantitative cardiac (15)O-water positron emission tomography
title Influence of image reconstruction on quantitative cardiac (15)O-water positron emission tomography
title_full Influence of image reconstruction on quantitative cardiac (15)O-water positron emission tomography
title_fullStr Influence of image reconstruction on quantitative cardiac (15)O-water positron emission tomography
title_full_unstemmed Influence of image reconstruction on quantitative cardiac (15)O-water positron emission tomography
title_short Influence of image reconstruction on quantitative cardiac (15)O-water positron emission tomography
title_sort influence of image reconstruction on quantitative cardiac (15)o-water positron emission tomography
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10126040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35927378
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12350-022-03075-5
work_keys_str_mv AT nordstromjonny influenceofimagereconstructiononquantitativecardiac15owaterpositronemissiontomography
AT lindstromelin influenceofimagereconstructiononquantitativecardiac15owaterpositronemissiontomography
AT kerotanja influenceofimagereconstructiononquantitativecardiac15owaterpositronemissiontomography
AT sorensenjens influenceofimagereconstructiononquantitativecardiac15owaterpositronemissiontomography
AT lubberinkmark influenceofimagereconstructiononquantitativecardiac15owaterpositronemissiontomography