Cargando…

Detection of vertebrates from natural and artificial inland water bodies in a semi‐arid habitat using eDNA from filtered, swept, and sediment samples

Biomonitoring is vital for establishing baseline data that is needed to identify and quantify ecological change and to inform management and conservation activities. However, biomonitoring and biodiversity assessment in arid environments, which are predicted to cover 56% of the Earth's land sur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McDonald, Rupert, Bateman, Philip W., Cooper, Christine, van der Heyde, Mieke, Mousavi‐Derazmahalleh, Mahsa, Hedges, Brock A., Guzik, Michelle T., Nevill, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10126312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37113520
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10014
_version_ 1785030213944475648
author McDonald, Rupert
Bateman, Philip W.
Cooper, Christine
van der Heyde, Mieke
Mousavi‐Derazmahalleh, Mahsa
Hedges, Brock A.
Guzik, Michelle T.
Nevill, Paul
author_facet McDonald, Rupert
Bateman, Philip W.
Cooper, Christine
van der Heyde, Mieke
Mousavi‐Derazmahalleh, Mahsa
Hedges, Brock A.
Guzik, Michelle T.
Nevill, Paul
author_sort McDonald, Rupert
collection PubMed
description Biomonitoring is vital for establishing baseline data that is needed to identify and quantify ecological change and to inform management and conservation activities. However, biomonitoring and biodiversity assessment in arid environments, which are predicted to cover 56% of the Earth's land surface by 2100, can be prohibitively time consuming, expensive, and logistically challenging due to their often remote and inhospitable nature. Sampling of environmental DNA (eDNA) coupled with high‐throughput sequencing is an emerging biodiversity assessment method. Here we explore the application of eDNA metabarcoding and various sampling approaches to estimate vertebrate richness and assemblage at human‐constructed and natural water sources in a semi‐arid region of Western Australia. Three sampling methods: sediment samples, filtering through a membrane with a pump, and membrane sweeping in the water body, were compared using two eDNA metabarcoding assays, 12S‐V5 and 16smam, for 120 eDNA samples collected from four gnammas (gnamma: Australian Indigenous Noongar language term–granite rock pools) and four cattle troughs in the Great Western Woodlands, Western Australia. We detected higher vertebrate richness in samples from cattle troughs and found differences between assemblages detected in gnammas (more birds and amphibians) and cattle troughs (more mammals, including feral taxa). Total vertebrate richness was not different between swept and filtered samples, but all sampling methods yielded different assemblages. Our findings indicate that eDNA surveys in arid lands will benefit from collecting multiple samples at multiple water sources to avoid underestimating vertebrate richness. The high concentration of eDNA in small, isolated water bodies permits the use of sweep sampling that simplifies sample collection, processing, and storage, particularly when assessing vertebrate biodiversity across large spatial scales.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10126312
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101263122023-04-26 Detection of vertebrates from natural and artificial inland water bodies in a semi‐arid habitat using eDNA from filtered, swept, and sediment samples McDonald, Rupert Bateman, Philip W. Cooper, Christine van der Heyde, Mieke Mousavi‐Derazmahalleh, Mahsa Hedges, Brock A. Guzik, Michelle T. Nevill, Paul Ecol Evol Research Articles Biomonitoring is vital for establishing baseline data that is needed to identify and quantify ecological change and to inform management and conservation activities. However, biomonitoring and biodiversity assessment in arid environments, which are predicted to cover 56% of the Earth's land surface by 2100, can be prohibitively time consuming, expensive, and logistically challenging due to their often remote and inhospitable nature. Sampling of environmental DNA (eDNA) coupled with high‐throughput sequencing is an emerging biodiversity assessment method. Here we explore the application of eDNA metabarcoding and various sampling approaches to estimate vertebrate richness and assemblage at human‐constructed and natural water sources in a semi‐arid region of Western Australia. Three sampling methods: sediment samples, filtering through a membrane with a pump, and membrane sweeping in the water body, were compared using two eDNA metabarcoding assays, 12S‐V5 and 16smam, for 120 eDNA samples collected from four gnammas (gnamma: Australian Indigenous Noongar language term–granite rock pools) and four cattle troughs in the Great Western Woodlands, Western Australia. We detected higher vertebrate richness in samples from cattle troughs and found differences between assemblages detected in gnammas (more birds and amphibians) and cattle troughs (more mammals, including feral taxa). Total vertebrate richness was not different between swept and filtered samples, but all sampling methods yielded different assemblages. Our findings indicate that eDNA surveys in arid lands will benefit from collecting multiple samples at multiple water sources to avoid underestimating vertebrate richness. The high concentration of eDNA in small, isolated water bodies permits the use of sweep sampling that simplifies sample collection, processing, and storage, particularly when assessing vertebrate biodiversity across large spatial scales. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10126312/ /pubmed/37113520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10014 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
McDonald, Rupert
Bateman, Philip W.
Cooper, Christine
van der Heyde, Mieke
Mousavi‐Derazmahalleh, Mahsa
Hedges, Brock A.
Guzik, Michelle T.
Nevill, Paul
Detection of vertebrates from natural and artificial inland water bodies in a semi‐arid habitat using eDNA from filtered, swept, and sediment samples
title Detection of vertebrates from natural and artificial inland water bodies in a semi‐arid habitat using eDNA from filtered, swept, and sediment samples
title_full Detection of vertebrates from natural and artificial inland water bodies in a semi‐arid habitat using eDNA from filtered, swept, and sediment samples
title_fullStr Detection of vertebrates from natural and artificial inland water bodies in a semi‐arid habitat using eDNA from filtered, swept, and sediment samples
title_full_unstemmed Detection of vertebrates from natural and artificial inland water bodies in a semi‐arid habitat using eDNA from filtered, swept, and sediment samples
title_short Detection of vertebrates from natural and artificial inland water bodies in a semi‐arid habitat using eDNA from filtered, swept, and sediment samples
title_sort detection of vertebrates from natural and artificial inland water bodies in a semi‐arid habitat using edna from filtered, swept, and sediment samples
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10126312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37113520
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10014
work_keys_str_mv AT mcdonaldrupert detectionofvertebratesfromnaturalandartificialinlandwaterbodiesinasemiaridhabitatusingednafromfilteredsweptandsedimentsamples
AT batemanphilipw detectionofvertebratesfromnaturalandartificialinlandwaterbodiesinasemiaridhabitatusingednafromfilteredsweptandsedimentsamples
AT cooperchristine detectionofvertebratesfromnaturalandartificialinlandwaterbodiesinasemiaridhabitatusingednafromfilteredsweptandsedimentsamples
AT vanderheydemieke detectionofvertebratesfromnaturalandartificialinlandwaterbodiesinasemiaridhabitatusingednafromfilteredsweptandsedimentsamples
AT mousaviderazmahallehmahsa detectionofvertebratesfromnaturalandartificialinlandwaterbodiesinasemiaridhabitatusingednafromfilteredsweptandsedimentsamples
AT hedgesbrocka detectionofvertebratesfromnaturalandartificialinlandwaterbodiesinasemiaridhabitatusingednafromfilteredsweptandsedimentsamples
AT guzikmichellet detectionofvertebratesfromnaturalandartificialinlandwaterbodiesinasemiaridhabitatusingednafromfilteredsweptandsedimentsamples
AT nevillpaul detectionofvertebratesfromnaturalandartificialinlandwaterbodiesinasemiaridhabitatusingednafromfilteredsweptandsedimentsamples