Cargando…
Detection of vertebrates from natural and artificial inland water bodies in a semi‐arid habitat using eDNA from filtered, swept, and sediment samples
Biomonitoring is vital for establishing baseline data that is needed to identify and quantify ecological change and to inform management and conservation activities. However, biomonitoring and biodiversity assessment in arid environments, which are predicted to cover 56% of the Earth's land sur...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10126312/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37113520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10014 |
_version_ | 1785030213944475648 |
---|---|
author | McDonald, Rupert Bateman, Philip W. Cooper, Christine van der Heyde, Mieke Mousavi‐Derazmahalleh, Mahsa Hedges, Brock A. Guzik, Michelle T. Nevill, Paul |
author_facet | McDonald, Rupert Bateman, Philip W. Cooper, Christine van der Heyde, Mieke Mousavi‐Derazmahalleh, Mahsa Hedges, Brock A. Guzik, Michelle T. Nevill, Paul |
author_sort | McDonald, Rupert |
collection | PubMed |
description | Biomonitoring is vital for establishing baseline data that is needed to identify and quantify ecological change and to inform management and conservation activities. However, biomonitoring and biodiversity assessment in arid environments, which are predicted to cover 56% of the Earth's land surface by 2100, can be prohibitively time consuming, expensive, and logistically challenging due to their often remote and inhospitable nature. Sampling of environmental DNA (eDNA) coupled with high‐throughput sequencing is an emerging biodiversity assessment method. Here we explore the application of eDNA metabarcoding and various sampling approaches to estimate vertebrate richness and assemblage at human‐constructed and natural water sources in a semi‐arid region of Western Australia. Three sampling methods: sediment samples, filtering through a membrane with a pump, and membrane sweeping in the water body, were compared using two eDNA metabarcoding assays, 12S‐V5 and 16smam, for 120 eDNA samples collected from four gnammas (gnamma: Australian Indigenous Noongar language term–granite rock pools) and four cattle troughs in the Great Western Woodlands, Western Australia. We detected higher vertebrate richness in samples from cattle troughs and found differences between assemblages detected in gnammas (more birds and amphibians) and cattle troughs (more mammals, including feral taxa). Total vertebrate richness was not different between swept and filtered samples, but all sampling methods yielded different assemblages. Our findings indicate that eDNA surveys in arid lands will benefit from collecting multiple samples at multiple water sources to avoid underestimating vertebrate richness. The high concentration of eDNA in small, isolated water bodies permits the use of sweep sampling that simplifies sample collection, processing, and storage, particularly when assessing vertebrate biodiversity across large spatial scales. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10126312 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101263122023-04-26 Detection of vertebrates from natural and artificial inland water bodies in a semi‐arid habitat using eDNA from filtered, swept, and sediment samples McDonald, Rupert Bateman, Philip W. Cooper, Christine van der Heyde, Mieke Mousavi‐Derazmahalleh, Mahsa Hedges, Brock A. Guzik, Michelle T. Nevill, Paul Ecol Evol Research Articles Biomonitoring is vital for establishing baseline data that is needed to identify and quantify ecological change and to inform management and conservation activities. However, biomonitoring and biodiversity assessment in arid environments, which are predicted to cover 56% of the Earth's land surface by 2100, can be prohibitively time consuming, expensive, and logistically challenging due to their often remote and inhospitable nature. Sampling of environmental DNA (eDNA) coupled with high‐throughput sequencing is an emerging biodiversity assessment method. Here we explore the application of eDNA metabarcoding and various sampling approaches to estimate vertebrate richness and assemblage at human‐constructed and natural water sources in a semi‐arid region of Western Australia. Three sampling methods: sediment samples, filtering through a membrane with a pump, and membrane sweeping in the water body, were compared using two eDNA metabarcoding assays, 12S‐V5 and 16smam, for 120 eDNA samples collected from four gnammas (gnamma: Australian Indigenous Noongar language term–granite rock pools) and four cattle troughs in the Great Western Woodlands, Western Australia. We detected higher vertebrate richness in samples from cattle troughs and found differences between assemblages detected in gnammas (more birds and amphibians) and cattle troughs (more mammals, including feral taxa). Total vertebrate richness was not different between swept and filtered samples, but all sampling methods yielded different assemblages. Our findings indicate that eDNA surveys in arid lands will benefit from collecting multiple samples at multiple water sources to avoid underestimating vertebrate richness. The high concentration of eDNA in small, isolated water bodies permits the use of sweep sampling that simplifies sample collection, processing, and storage, particularly when assessing vertebrate biodiversity across large spatial scales. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10126312/ /pubmed/37113520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10014 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles McDonald, Rupert Bateman, Philip W. Cooper, Christine van der Heyde, Mieke Mousavi‐Derazmahalleh, Mahsa Hedges, Brock A. Guzik, Michelle T. Nevill, Paul Detection of vertebrates from natural and artificial inland water bodies in a semi‐arid habitat using eDNA from filtered, swept, and sediment samples |
title | Detection of vertebrates from natural and artificial inland water bodies in a semi‐arid habitat using eDNA from filtered, swept, and sediment samples |
title_full | Detection of vertebrates from natural and artificial inland water bodies in a semi‐arid habitat using eDNA from filtered, swept, and sediment samples |
title_fullStr | Detection of vertebrates from natural and artificial inland water bodies in a semi‐arid habitat using eDNA from filtered, swept, and sediment samples |
title_full_unstemmed | Detection of vertebrates from natural and artificial inland water bodies in a semi‐arid habitat using eDNA from filtered, swept, and sediment samples |
title_short | Detection of vertebrates from natural and artificial inland water bodies in a semi‐arid habitat using eDNA from filtered, swept, and sediment samples |
title_sort | detection of vertebrates from natural and artificial inland water bodies in a semi‐arid habitat using edna from filtered, swept, and sediment samples |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10126312/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37113520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10014 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcdonaldrupert detectionofvertebratesfromnaturalandartificialinlandwaterbodiesinasemiaridhabitatusingednafromfilteredsweptandsedimentsamples AT batemanphilipw detectionofvertebratesfromnaturalandartificialinlandwaterbodiesinasemiaridhabitatusingednafromfilteredsweptandsedimentsamples AT cooperchristine detectionofvertebratesfromnaturalandartificialinlandwaterbodiesinasemiaridhabitatusingednafromfilteredsweptandsedimentsamples AT vanderheydemieke detectionofvertebratesfromnaturalandartificialinlandwaterbodiesinasemiaridhabitatusingednafromfilteredsweptandsedimentsamples AT mousaviderazmahallehmahsa detectionofvertebratesfromnaturalandartificialinlandwaterbodiesinasemiaridhabitatusingednafromfilteredsweptandsedimentsamples AT hedgesbrocka detectionofvertebratesfromnaturalandartificialinlandwaterbodiesinasemiaridhabitatusingednafromfilteredsweptandsedimentsamples AT guzikmichellet detectionofvertebratesfromnaturalandartificialinlandwaterbodiesinasemiaridhabitatusingednafromfilteredsweptandsedimentsamples AT nevillpaul detectionofvertebratesfromnaturalandartificialinlandwaterbodiesinasemiaridhabitatusingednafromfilteredsweptandsedimentsamples |