Cargando…
Treatment of pediatric fistula-in-ano—Sphincter-sparing non-cutting seton placement as the future treatment of choice?
BACKGROUND: Therapeutic principles of fistula-in-ano (FIA) are lacking evidence-based consensus on treatment options. Non-cutting, sphincter-sparing options have not been published for infancy and childhood FIA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We are presenting retrospective data on FIA treatment with non-cut...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10126327/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37114148 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1144425 |
_version_ | 1785030218200645632 |
---|---|
author | Besendörfer, Manuel Langer, Laurin Carbon, Roman Weiss, Christel Müller, Hanna Diez, Sonja |
author_facet | Besendörfer, Manuel Langer, Laurin Carbon, Roman Weiss, Christel Müller, Hanna Diez, Sonja |
author_sort | Besendörfer, Manuel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Therapeutic principles of fistula-in-ano (FIA) are lacking evidence-based consensus on treatment options. Non-cutting, sphincter-sparing options have not been published for infancy and childhood FIA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We are presenting retrospective data on FIA treatment with non-cutting seton placement between 2011 and 2020. Data were collected based on medical records and complemented by patients’ contact for follow-up analyses between November 2021 and October 2022. Data were analyzed regarding the outcome variables of recurrent FIA and recurrent perianal abscess. Furthermore, outcomes in different age groups were compared (<1/1.5–12 years of age). RESULTS: Treatment duration with non-cutting seton was at a median of 4.6 months and was not associated with recurrent FIA (p = 0.8893). Overall recurrence rate of FIA within an observation time of 9 months postsurgically was at 7% (n = 3/42) and was only seen in infancy, whereas recurrent perianal abscess was mainly observable in children (n = 2, p = 0.2132). Comparison of age groups revealed no significant differences. Of the 42 included patients, 37 responded in the follow-up analysis, resulting in a response rate of 88% with a median follow-up time of 4.9 years. Fecal incontinence was postsurgically only seen in two patients, who were diagnosed prior to surgery and symptoms remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Non-cutting seton placement might be a promising option in the treatment of FIA in infancy and childhood. Perioperative settings like duration of placed seton and antibiotic treatment have to be discussed in further prospective, enlarged population-based studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10126327 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101263272023-04-26 Treatment of pediatric fistula-in-ano—Sphincter-sparing non-cutting seton placement as the future treatment of choice? Besendörfer, Manuel Langer, Laurin Carbon, Roman Weiss, Christel Müller, Hanna Diez, Sonja Front Surg Surgery BACKGROUND: Therapeutic principles of fistula-in-ano (FIA) are lacking evidence-based consensus on treatment options. Non-cutting, sphincter-sparing options have not been published for infancy and childhood FIA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We are presenting retrospective data on FIA treatment with non-cutting seton placement between 2011 and 2020. Data were collected based on medical records and complemented by patients’ contact for follow-up analyses between November 2021 and October 2022. Data were analyzed regarding the outcome variables of recurrent FIA and recurrent perianal abscess. Furthermore, outcomes in different age groups were compared (<1/1.5–12 years of age). RESULTS: Treatment duration with non-cutting seton was at a median of 4.6 months and was not associated with recurrent FIA (p = 0.8893). Overall recurrence rate of FIA within an observation time of 9 months postsurgically was at 7% (n = 3/42) and was only seen in infancy, whereas recurrent perianal abscess was mainly observable in children (n = 2, p = 0.2132). Comparison of age groups revealed no significant differences. Of the 42 included patients, 37 responded in the follow-up analysis, resulting in a response rate of 88% with a median follow-up time of 4.9 years. Fecal incontinence was postsurgically only seen in two patients, who were diagnosed prior to surgery and symptoms remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Non-cutting seton placement might be a promising option in the treatment of FIA in infancy and childhood. Perioperative settings like duration of placed seton and antibiotic treatment have to be discussed in further prospective, enlarged population-based studies. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10126327/ /pubmed/37114148 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1144425 Text en © 2023 Besendörfer, Langer, Carbon, Weiss, Müller and Diez. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Surgery Besendörfer, Manuel Langer, Laurin Carbon, Roman Weiss, Christel Müller, Hanna Diez, Sonja Treatment of pediatric fistula-in-ano—Sphincter-sparing non-cutting seton placement as the future treatment of choice? |
title | Treatment of pediatric fistula-in-ano—Sphincter-sparing non-cutting seton placement as the future treatment of choice? |
title_full | Treatment of pediatric fistula-in-ano—Sphincter-sparing non-cutting seton placement as the future treatment of choice? |
title_fullStr | Treatment of pediatric fistula-in-ano—Sphincter-sparing non-cutting seton placement as the future treatment of choice? |
title_full_unstemmed | Treatment of pediatric fistula-in-ano—Sphincter-sparing non-cutting seton placement as the future treatment of choice? |
title_short | Treatment of pediatric fistula-in-ano—Sphincter-sparing non-cutting seton placement as the future treatment of choice? |
title_sort | treatment of pediatric fistula-in-ano—sphincter-sparing non-cutting seton placement as the future treatment of choice? |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10126327/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37114148 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1144425 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT besendorfermanuel treatmentofpediatricfistulainanosphinctersparingnoncuttingsetonplacementasthefuturetreatmentofchoice AT langerlaurin treatmentofpediatricfistulainanosphinctersparingnoncuttingsetonplacementasthefuturetreatmentofchoice AT carbonroman treatmentofpediatricfistulainanosphinctersparingnoncuttingsetonplacementasthefuturetreatmentofchoice AT weisschristel treatmentofpediatricfistulainanosphinctersparingnoncuttingsetonplacementasthefuturetreatmentofchoice AT mullerhanna treatmentofpediatricfistulainanosphinctersparingnoncuttingsetonplacementasthefuturetreatmentofchoice AT diezsonja treatmentofpediatricfistulainanosphinctersparingnoncuttingsetonplacementasthefuturetreatmentofchoice |