Cargando…

Treatment of pediatric fistula-in-ano—Sphincter-sparing non-cutting seton placement as the future treatment of choice?

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic principles of fistula-in-ano (FIA) are lacking evidence-based consensus on treatment options. Non-cutting, sphincter-sparing options have not been published for infancy and childhood FIA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We are presenting retrospective data on FIA treatment with non-cut...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Besendörfer, Manuel, Langer, Laurin, Carbon, Roman, Weiss, Christel, Müller, Hanna, Diez, Sonja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10126327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37114148
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1144425
_version_ 1785030218200645632
author Besendörfer, Manuel
Langer, Laurin
Carbon, Roman
Weiss, Christel
Müller, Hanna
Diez, Sonja
author_facet Besendörfer, Manuel
Langer, Laurin
Carbon, Roman
Weiss, Christel
Müller, Hanna
Diez, Sonja
author_sort Besendörfer, Manuel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Therapeutic principles of fistula-in-ano (FIA) are lacking evidence-based consensus on treatment options. Non-cutting, sphincter-sparing options have not been published for infancy and childhood FIA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We are presenting retrospective data on FIA treatment with non-cutting seton placement between 2011 and 2020. Data were collected based on medical records and complemented by patients’ contact for follow-up analyses between November 2021 and October 2022. Data were analyzed regarding the outcome variables of recurrent FIA and recurrent perianal abscess. Furthermore, outcomes in different age groups were compared (<1/1.5–12 years of age). RESULTS: Treatment duration with non-cutting seton was at a median of 4.6 months and was not associated with recurrent FIA (p = 0.8893). Overall recurrence rate of FIA within an observation time of 9 months postsurgically was at 7% (n = 3/42) and was only seen in infancy, whereas recurrent perianal abscess was mainly observable in children (n = 2, p = 0.2132). Comparison of age groups revealed no significant differences. Of the 42 included patients, 37 responded in the follow-up analysis, resulting in a response rate of 88% with a median follow-up time of 4.9 years. Fecal incontinence was postsurgically only seen in two patients, who were diagnosed prior to surgery and symptoms remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Non-cutting seton placement might be a promising option in the treatment of FIA in infancy and childhood. Perioperative settings like duration of placed seton and antibiotic treatment have to be discussed in further prospective, enlarged population-based studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10126327
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101263272023-04-26 Treatment of pediatric fistula-in-ano—Sphincter-sparing non-cutting seton placement as the future treatment of choice? Besendörfer, Manuel Langer, Laurin Carbon, Roman Weiss, Christel Müller, Hanna Diez, Sonja Front Surg Surgery BACKGROUND: Therapeutic principles of fistula-in-ano (FIA) are lacking evidence-based consensus on treatment options. Non-cutting, sphincter-sparing options have not been published for infancy and childhood FIA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We are presenting retrospective data on FIA treatment with non-cutting seton placement between 2011 and 2020. Data were collected based on medical records and complemented by patients’ contact for follow-up analyses between November 2021 and October 2022. Data were analyzed regarding the outcome variables of recurrent FIA and recurrent perianal abscess. Furthermore, outcomes in different age groups were compared (<1/1.5–12 years of age). RESULTS: Treatment duration with non-cutting seton was at a median of 4.6 months and was not associated with recurrent FIA (p = 0.8893). Overall recurrence rate of FIA within an observation time of 9 months postsurgically was at 7% (n = 3/42) and was only seen in infancy, whereas recurrent perianal abscess was mainly observable in children (n = 2, p = 0.2132). Comparison of age groups revealed no significant differences. Of the 42 included patients, 37 responded in the follow-up analysis, resulting in a response rate of 88% with a median follow-up time of 4.9 years. Fecal incontinence was postsurgically only seen in two patients, who were diagnosed prior to surgery and symptoms remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Non-cutting seton placement might be a promising option in the treatment of FIA in infancy and childhood. Perioperative settings like duration of placed seton and antibiotic treatment have to be discussed in further prospective, enlarged population-based studies. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10126327/ /pubmed/37114148 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1144425 Text en © 2023 Besendörfer, Langer, Carbon, Weiss, Müller and Diez. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Besendörfer, Manuel
Langer, Laurin
Carbon, Roman
Weiss, Christel
Müller, Hanna
Diez, Sonja
Treatment of pediatric fistula-in-ano—Sphincter-sparing non-cutting seton placement as the future treatment of choice?
title Treatment of pediatric fistula-in-ano—Sphincter-sparing non-cutting seton placement as the future treatment of choice?
title_full Treatment of pediatric fistula-in-ano—Sphincter-sparing non-cutting seton placement as the future treatment of choice?
title_fullStr Treatment of pediatric fistula-in-ano—Sphincter-sparing non-cutting seton placement as the future treatment of choice?
title_full_unstemmed Treatment of pediatric fistula-in-ano—Sphincter-sparing non-cutting seton placement as the future treatment of choice?
title_short Treatment of pediatric fistula-in-ano—Sphincter-sparing non-cutting seton placement as the future treatment of choice?
title_sort treatment of pediatric fistula-in-ano—sphincter-sparing non-cutting seton placement as the future treatment of choice?
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10126327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37114148
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1144425
work_keys_str_mv AT besendorfermanuel treatmentofpediatricfistulainanosphinctersparingnoncuttingsetonplacementasthefuturetreatmentofchoice
AT langerlaurin treatmentofpediatricfistulainanosphinctersparingnoncuttingsetonplacementasthefuturetreatmentofchoice
AT carbonroman treatmentofpediatricfistulainanosphinctersparingnoncuttingsetonplacementasthefuturetreatmentofchoice
AT weisschristel treatmentofpediatricfistulainanosphinctersparingnoncuttingsetonplacementasthefuturetreatmentofchoice
AT mullerhanna treatmentofpediatricfistulainanosphinctersparingnoncuttingsetonplacementasthefuturetreatmentofchoice
AT diezsonja treatmentofpediatricfistulainanosphinctersparingnoncuttingsetonplacementasthefuturetreatmentofchoice