Cargando…

Accuracy of Self-Reported Physical Capacities as a Clinical Screening Test for Older Adults With Mobility Disability

Background: Screening for poor physical performance has the potential to identify older adults at risk for loss of future independence, yet clinically feasible measures have yet to be identified. Methods: Using data from the National Health and Aging Trends Study, we evaluated the diagnostic utility...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sciamanna, Christopher N., Lemaster, Kent A., Danilovich, Margaret K., Conroy, David E., Schmitz, Kathryn H., Silvis, Matthew, Ladwig, Matthew, Ballentine, Noel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10126779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37113797
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23337214231167979
_version_ 1785030333166518272
author Sciamanna, Christopher N.
Lemaster, Kent A.
Danilovich, Margaret K.
Conroy, David E.
Schmitz, Kathryn H.
Silvis, Matthew
Ladwig, Matthew
Ballentine, Noel
author_facet Sciamanna, Christopher N.
Lemaster, Kent A.
Danilovich, Margaret K.
Conroy, David E.
Schmitz, Kathryn H.
Silvis, Matthew
Ladwig, Matthew
Ballentine, Noel
author_sort Sciamanna, Christopher N.
collection PubMed
description Background: Screening for poor physical performance has the potential to identify older adults at risk for loss of future independence, yet clinically feasible measures have yet to be identified. Methods: Using data from the National Health and Aging Trends Study, we evaluated the diagnostic utility of self-reported physical capacities of older adults (walking three blocks or six blocks, climbing 10 stairs or 20 stairs) compared to the objectively measured Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). Sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratio (LR) were calculated across three SPPB cut-points (≤8, ≤9, ≤10). Results: Sensitivity of single item-measures for detecting a low SBBP averaged 0.39 (range: 0.26–0.52), specific averaged 0.97 (range: 0.94–0.99) and likelihood ratio averaged 20.0 (range: 9.0–35.5). Among age and gender subgroups, all measures maintained clinically applicable LRs (minimum = 4.59). Conclusion: Single-item self-reported physical capacities are accurate for screening older adults with physical limitations, making them potentially useful in healthcare settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10126779
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101267792023-04-26 Accuracy of Self-Reported Physical Capacities as a Clinical Screening Test for Older Adults With Mobility Disability Sciamanna, Christopher N. Lemaster, Kent A. Danilovich, Margaret K. Conroy, David E. Schmitz, Kathryn H. Silvis, Matthew Ladwig, Matthew Ballentine, Noel Gerontol Geriatr Med Article Background: Screening for poor physical performance has the potential to identify older adults at risk for loss of future independence, yet clinically feasible measures have yet to be identified. Methods: Using data from the National Health and Aging Trends Study, we evaluated the diagnostic utility of self-reported physical capacities of older adults (walking three blocks or six blocks, climbing 10 stairs or 20 stairs) compared to the objectively measured Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). Sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratio (LR) were calculated across three SPPB cut-points (≤8, ≤9, ≤10). Results: Sensitivity of single item-measures for detecting a low SBBP averaged 0.39 (range: 0.26–0.52), specific averaged 0.97 (range: 0.94–0.99) and likelihood ratio averaged 20.0 (range: 9.0–35.5). Among age and gender subgroups, all measures maintained clinically applicable LRs (minimum = 4.59). Conclusion: Single-item self-reported physical capacities are accurate for screening older adults with physical limitations, making them potentially useful in healthcare settings. SAGE Publications 2023-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10126779/ /pubmed/37113797 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23337214231167979 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Sciamanna, Christopher N.
Lemaster, Kent A.
Danilovich, Margaret K.
Conroy, David E.
Schmitz, Kathryn H.
Silvis, Matthew
Ladwig, Matthew
Ballentine, Noel
Accuracy of Self-Reported Physical Capacities as a Clinical Screening Test for Older Adults With Mobility Disability
title Accuracy of Self-Reported Physical Capacities as a Clinical Screening Test for Older Adults With Mobility Disability
title_full Accuracy of Self-Reported Physical Capacities as a Clinical Screening Test for Older Adults With Mobility Disability
title_fullStr Accuracy of Self-Reported Physical Capacities as a Clinical Screening Test for Older Adults With Mobility Disability
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of Self-Reported Physical Capacities as a Clinical Screening Test for Older Adults With Mobility Disability
title_short Accuracy of Self-Reported Physical Capacities as a Clinical Screening Test for Older Adults With Mobility Disability
title_sort accuracy of self-reported physical capacities as a clinical screening test for older adults with mobility disability
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10126779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37113797
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23337214231167979
work_keys_str_mv AT sciamannachristophern accuracyofselfreportedphysicalcapacitiesasaclinicalscreeningtestforolderadultswithmobilitydisability
AT lemasterkenta accuracyofselfreportedphysicalcapacitiesasaclinicalscreeningtestforolderadultswithmobilitydisability
AT danilovichmargaretk accuracyofselfreportedphysicalcapacitiesasaclinicalscreeningtestforolderadultswithmobilitydisability
AT conroydavide accuracyofselfreportedphysicalcapacitiesasaclinicalscreeningtestforolderadultswithmobilitydisability
AT schmitzkathrynh accuracyofselfreportedphysicalcapacitiesasaclinicalscreeningtestforolderadultswithmobilitydisability
AT silvismatthew accuracyofselfreportedphysicalcapacitiesasaclinicalscreeningtestforolderadultswithmobilitydisability
AT ladwigmatthew accuracyofselfreportedphysicalcapacitiesasaclinicalscreeningtestforolderadultswithmobilitydisability
AT ballentinenoel accuracyofselfreportedphysicalcapacitiesasaclinicalscreeningtestforolderadultswithmobilitydisability