Cargando…

Evaluation of alveolar bone morphology of incisors with different sagittal skeletal facial types by cone beam computed tomography: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND: Safe orthodontic tooth movement should be performed within the alveolar bone. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the morphology of the alveolar bone of incisors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included pretreatment cone beam computed tomography of 120 patients wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Xu, Gao, Jie, Sun, Weifu, Zhang, Haolin, Qin, Wen, Jin, Zuolin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10126934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37113777
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15369
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Safe orthodontic tooth movement should be performed within the alveolar bone. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the morphology of the alveolar bone of incisors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included pretreatment cone beam computed tomography of 120 patients with malocclusion. Patients were divided into 4 groups (Class I, Class II division 1, Class II division 2 and Class III) according to the subspinale-nasion-supramental (ANB) angle and occlusal relationship. The sagittal root positions, anterior and posterior root-cortical bone angles (AR-CA and PR-CA), root-crown ratios (RCR) and alveolar bone thickness were evaluated. RESULTS: The sagittal root positions were mainly positioned against the labial cortical plate in the maxillary incisors of the Class II division 2 group and engaged by both the labial and palatal cortical plates in the mandibular incisors of the Class III group. The AR-CA was lower than that in the other groups (P < 0.01) in the maxillary incisors of the Class II division 2 group, and the AR-CA and PR-CA were lower than those in the other groups (P < 0.01) in the mandibular incisors of the Class III group. The alveolar thickness showed no significant difference between the Class II division 1 group and the Class I group (P > 0.05), the middle and lower anterior alveolar thickness (LAAT and MAAT) were lower than those in other groups (P < 0.01) in the maxillary incisors of the Class II division 2 group, and the alveolar thickness at the measurement sites of the middle and lower line were lower than those in other groups (P < 0.01) in the mandibular incisors of the Class III group. The RCR had a moderate positive correlation with the LAAT. CONCLUSION: Based on several limitations, this study found that maxillary incisor roots were at risk of penetrating the alveolar bone of Class II division 2 patients, and mandibular incisors may have a relatively small range of safe movement on both the labial and lingual sides of Class III patients during orthodontic treatment.