Cargando…

The sensitivity and specificity of using the McGill pain subscale for diagnosing neuropathic and non-neuropathic chronic pain in the total joint arthroplasty population

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to describe the diagnostic performance of the Neuropathic Pain Subscale of McGill [NP-MPQ (SF-2)] and the Self-Administered Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (S-LANSS) questionnaire in differentiating people with neuropathic chronic pain pos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boljanovic-Susic, Dragana, Ziebart, Christina, MacDermid, Joy, de Beer, Justin, Petruccelli, Danielle, Woodhouse, Linda J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10127094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37095584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40945-023-00164-7
_version_ 1785030391085662208
author Boljanovic-Susic, Dragana
Ziebart, Christina
MacDermid, Joy
de Beer, Justin
Petruccelli, Danielle
Woodhouse, Linda J.
author_facet Boljanovic-Susic, Dragana
Ziebart, Christina
MacDermid, Joy
de Beer, Justin
Petruccelli, Danielle
Woodhouse, Linda J.
author_sort Boljanovic-Susic, Dragana
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to describe the diagnostic performance of the Neuropathic Pain Subscale of McGill [NP-MPQ (SF-2)] and the Self-Administered Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (S-LANSS) questionnaire in differentiating people with neuropathic chronic pain post total joint arthroplasty (TJA). METHODS: This study was a survey of a cohort of individuals who had undergone primary, unilateral total knee, or hip joint arthroplasty. The questionnaires were administered by mail. The time interval from operation to the completion of the postal survey varied from 1.5 to 3.5 years post-surgery. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to assess the overall diagnostic power and determine the optimal threshold value of the NP-MPQ (SF-2) in identification of neuropathic pain. RESULTS: S-LANSS identified 19 subjects (28%) as having neuropathic pain (NP), while NP-MPQ (SF-2) subscale identified 29 (43%). When using the S-LANSS as the reference standard, a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis for NP-MPQ (SF-2) had an area under the curve of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.82, 0.97); a cut off score of 0.91 NP-MPQ (SF-2) maximized sensitivity (89.5%) and specificity (75.0%). Correlation between the measures was moderate (r = 0.56; 95% CI: 0.40, 0.68). CONCLUSION: These finding suggest some conceptual overlap but some variability in diagnosis of NP which may relate to scale-tapping into different dimensions of the pain experience, or the different scoring metrics. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40945-023-00164-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10127094
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101270942023-04-26 The sensitivity and specificity of using the McGill pain subscale for diagnosing neuropathic and non-neuropathic chronic pain in the total joint arthroplasty population Boljanovic-Susic, Dragana Ziebart, Christina MacDermid, Joy de Beer, Justin Petruccelli, Danielle Woodhouse, Linda J. Arch Physiother Research Article BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to describe the diagnostic performance of the Neuropathic Pain Subscale of McGill [NP-MPQ (SF-2)] and the Self-Administered Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (S-LANSS) questionnaire in differentiating people with neuropathic chronic pain post total joint arthroplasty (TJA). METHODS: This study was a survey of a cohort of individuals who had undergone primary, unilateral total knee, or hip joint arthroplasty. The questionnaires were administered by mail. The time interval from operation to the completion of the postal survey varied from 1.5 to 3.5 years post-surgery. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to assess the overall diagnostic power and determine the optimal threshold value of the NP-MPQ (SF-2) in identification of neuropathic pain. RESULTS: S-LANSS identified 19 subjects (28%) as having neuropathic pain (NP), while NP-MPQ (SF-2) subscale identified 29 (43%). When using the S-LANSS as the reference standard, a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis for NP-MPQ (SF-2) had an area under the curve of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.82, 0.97); a cut off score of 0.91 NP-MPQ (SF-2) maximized sensitivity (89.5%) and specificity (75.0%). Correlation between the measures was moderate (r = 0.56; 95% CI: 0.40, 0.68). CONCLUSION: These finding suggest some conceptual overlap but some variability in diagnosis of NP which may relate to scale-tapping into different dimensions of the pain experience, or the different scoring metrics. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40945-023-00164-7. BioMed Central 2023-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10127094/ /pubmed/37095584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40945-023-00164-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Boljanovic-Susic, Dragana
Ziebart, Christina
MacDermid, Joy
de Beer, Justin
Petruccelli, Danielle
Woodhouse, Linda J.
The sensitivity and specificity of using the McGill pain subscale for diagnosing neuropathic and non-neuropathic chronic pain in the total joint arthroplasty population
title The sensitivity and specificity of using the McGill pain subscale for diagnosing neuropathic and non-neuropathic chronic pain in the total joint arthroplasty population
title_full The sensitivity and specificity of using the McGill pain subscale for diagnosing neuropathic and non-neuropathic chronic pain in the total joint arthroplasty population
title_fullStr The sensitivity and specificity of using the McGill pain subscale for diagnosing neuropathic and non-neuropathic chronic pain in the total joint arthroplasty population
title_full_unstemmed The sensitivity and specificity of using the McGill pain subscale for diagnosing neuropathic and non-neuropathic chronic pain in the total joint arthroplasty population
title_short The sensitivity and specificity of using the McGill pain subscale for diagnosing neuropathic and non-neuropathic chronic pain in the total joint arthroplasty population
title_sort sensitivity and specificity of using the mcgill pain subscale for diagnosing neuropathic and non-neuropathic chronic pain in the total joint arthroplasty population
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10127094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37095584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40945-023-00164-7
work_keys_str_mv AT boljanovicsusicdragana thesensitivityandspecificityofusingthemcgillpainsubscalefordiagnosingneuropathicandnonneuropathicchronicpaininthetotaljointarthroplastypopulation
AT ziebartchristina thesensitivityandspecificityofusingthemcgillpainsubscalefordiagnosingneuropathicandnonneuropathicchronicpaininthetotaljointarthroplastypopulation
AT macdermidjoy thesensitivityandspecificityofusingthemcgillpainsubscalefordiagnosingneuropathicandnonneuropathicchronicpaininthetotaljointarthroplastypopulation
AT debeerjustin thesensitivityandspecificityofusingthemcgillpainsubscalefordiagnosingneuropathicandnonneuropathicchronicpaininthetotaljointarthroplastypopulation
AT petruccellidanielle thesensitivityandspecificityofusingthemcgillpainsubscalefordiagnosingneuropathicandnonneuropathicchronicpaininthetotaljointarthroplastypopulation
AT woodhouselindaj thesensitivityandspecificityofusingthemcgillpainsubscalefordiagnosingneuropathicandnonneuropathicchronicpaininthetotaljointarthroplastypopulation
AT boljanovicsusicdragana sensitivityandspecificityofusingthemcgillpainsubscalefordiagnosingneuropathicandnonneuropathicchronicpaininthetotaljointarthroplastypopulation
AT ziebartchristina sensitivityandspecificityofusingthemcgillpainsubscalefordiagnosingneuropathicandnonneuropathicchronicpaininthetotaljointarthroplastypopulation
AT macdermidjoy sensitivityandspecificityofusingthemcgillpainsubscalefordiagnosingneuropathicandnonneuropathicchronicpaininthetotaljointarthroplastypopulation
AT debeerjustin sensitivityandspecificityofusingthemcgillpainsubscalefordiagnosingneuropathicandnonneuropathicchronicpaininthetotaljointarthroplastypopulation
AT petruccellidanielle sensitivityandspecificityofusingthemcgillpainsubscalefordiagnosingneuropathicandnonneuropathicchronicpaininthetotaljointarthroplastypopulation
AT woodhouselindaj sensitivityandspecificityofusingthemcgillpainsubscalefordiagnosingneuropathicandnonneuropathicchronicpaininthetotaljointarthroplastypopulation