Cargando…

An assessment of requirements in investments, new technologies, and infrastructures to achieve the SDGs

BACKGROUND: The implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) requires much planning and the provision of resources, especially regarding the necessary investments, technologies and infrastructures needed. Yet, it is presently unclear how available these elements are, what gaps exist, w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leal Filho, Walter, Vidal, Diogo Guedes, Chen, Chen, Petrova, Maria, Dinis, Maria Alzira Pimenta, Yang, Peter, Rogers, Steven, Álvarez-Castañón, Lorena, Djekic, Ilija, Sharifi, Ayyoob, Neiva, Samara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10127159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37128271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12302-022-00629-9
_version_ 1785030403892969472
author Leal Filho, Walter
Vidal, Diogo Guedes
Chen, Chen
Petrova, Maria
Dinis, Maria Alzira Pimenta
Yang, Peter
Rogers, Steven
Álvarez-Castañón, Lorena
Djekic, Ilija
Sharifi, Ayyoob
Neiva, Samara
author_facet Leal Filho, Walter
Vidal, Diogo Guedes
Chen, Chen
Petrova, Maria
Dinis, Maria Alzira Pimenta
Yang, Peter
Rogers, Steven
Álvarez-Castañón, Lorena
Djekic, Ilija
Sharifi, Ayyoob
Neiva, Samara
author_sort Leal Filho, Walter
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) requires much planning and the provision of resources, especially regarding the necessary investments, technologies and infrastructures needed. Yet, it is presently unclear how available these elements are, what gaps exist, what changes have taken place in terms of their availability since the adoption of the SDGs and what their requirements will be in the future. The knowledge gap has become even more concerning because of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Using a bibliometric analysis, an assessment of the global progress of SDG implementation and requirements, identifying challenges through the development of a matrix, and a set of 11 case studies to triangulate the holistic analysis, an assessment of the global progress of the SDGs implementation and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on this process was carried out. RESULTS: The findings suggest that the scope and width of resources limitation are currently undermining the implementation of the SDGs. Apart from the fact that the pace of progress has been insufficient, the potential of the SDGs in pursuing sustainability and improving life quality is not fully realised. This trend suggests that a substantial acceleration of the efforts is needed, especially for the five SDGs whose progress since 2015 has not been optimal, namely SDG2, SDG11, SDG13, SDG15, and SDG16, while SDG3, SDG7, SDG9, SDG14, and SDG17 show signs of progress. The case studies showed that different industries have dissimilar effects on achieving the SDGs, with the food sector correlating with 15 SDGs, as opposed to the energy sector correlating with 6 SDGs. Accordingly, the priority level assessment in terms of achieving the SDGs, points to the need to further advance the above-mentioned five SDGs, i.e., 2, 11, 13, 15 and 16. CONCLUSIONS: This study fills in a knowledge gap in respect of the current need for and availability of investments, new technologies, and infrastructures to allow countries to pursue the SDGs. It is suggested that this availability is rather limited in specific contexts. In respect of the needs to be addressed, these include resource-related constraints, limited technologies and infrastructures, affecting SDG2, SDG11, SDG13, SDG15, and SDG16, whose progress needs to be enhanced. Since the global progress in the process of implementation of the SDGs depends directly and indirectly on addressing the resource gaps, it is suggested that this topic be further investigated, so that the present imbalances in the three dimensions of sustainable development: the economic, social and environmental, be adequately addressed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12302-022-00629-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10127159
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101271592023-04-27 An assessment of requirements in investments, new technologies, and infrastructures to achieve the SDGs Leal Filho, Walter Vidal, Diogo Guedes Chen, Chen Petrova, Maria Dinis, Maria Alzira Pimenta Yang, Peter Rogers, Steven Álvarez-Castañón, Lorena Djekic, Ilija Sharifi, Ayyoob Neiva, Samara Environ Sci Eur Research BACKGROUND: The implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) requires much planning and the provision of resources, especially regarding the necessary investments, technologies and infrastructures needed. Yet, it is presently unclear how available these elements are, what gaps exist, what changes have taken place in terms of their availability since the adoption of the SDGs and what their requirements will be in the future. The knowledge gap has become even more concerning because of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Using a bibliometric analysis, an assessment of the global progress of SDG implementation and requirements, identifying challenges through the development of a matrix, and a set of 11 case studies to triangulate the holistic analysis, an assessment of the global progress of the SDGs implementation and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on this process was carried out. RESULTS: The findings suggest that the scope and width of resources limitation are currently undermining the implementation of the SDGs. Apart from the fact that the pace of progress has been insufficient, the potential of the SDGs in pursuing sustainability and improving life quality is not fully realised. This trend suggests that a substantial acceleration of the efforts is needed, especially for the five SDGs whose progress since 2015 has not been optimal, namely SDG2, SDG11, SDG13, SDG15, and SDG16, while SDG3, SDG7, SDG9, SDG14, and SDG17 show signs of progress. The case studies showed that different industries have dissimilar effects on achieving the SDGs, with the food sector correlating with 15 SDGs, as opposed to the energy sector correlating with 6 SDGs. Accordingly, the priority level assessment in terms of achieving the SDGs, points to the need to further advance the above-mentioned five SDGs, i.e., 2, 11, 13, 15 and 16. CONCLUSIONS: This study fills in a knowledge gap in respect of the current need for and availability of investments, new technologies, and infrastructures to allow countries to pursue the SDGs. It is suggested that this availability is rather limited in specific contexts. In respect of the needs to be addressed, these include resource-related constraints, limited technologies and infrastructures, affecting SDG2, SDG11, SDG13, SDG15, and SDG16, whose progress needs to be enhanced. Since the global progress in the process of implementation of the SDGs depends directly and indirectly on addressing the resource gaps, it is suggested that this topic be further investigated, so that the present imbalances in the three dimensions of sustainable development: the economic, social and environmental, be adequately addressed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12302-022-00629-9. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-07-01 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC10127159/ /pubmed/37128271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12302-022-00629-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Leal Filho, Walter
Vidal, Diogo Guedes
Chen, Chen
Petrova, Maria
Dinis, Maria Alzira Pimenta
Yang, Peter
Rogers, Steven
Álvarez-Castañón, Lorena
Djekic, Ilija
Sharifi, Ayyoob
Neiva, Samara
An assessment of requirements in investments, new technologies, and infrastructures to achieve the SDGs
title An assessment of requirements in investments, new technologies, and infrastructures to achieve the SDGs
title_full An assessment of requirements in investments, new technologies, and infrastructures to achieve the SDGs
title_fullStr An assessment of requirements in investments, new technologies, and infrastructures to achieve the SDGs
title_full_unstemmed An assessment of requirements in investments, new technologies, and infrastructures to achieve the SDGs
title_short An assessment of requirements in investments, new technologies, and infrastructures to achieve the SDGs
title_sort assessment of requirements in investments, new technologies, and infrastructures to achieve the sdgs
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10127159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37128271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12302-022-00629-9
work_keys_str_mv AT lealfilhowalter anassessmentofrequirementsininvestmentsnewtechnologiesandinfrastructurestoachievethesdgs
AT vidaldiogoguedes anassessmentofrequirementsininvestmentsnewtechnologiesandinfrastructurestoachievethesdgs
AT chenchen anassessmentofrequirementsininvestmentsnewtechnologiesandinfrastructurestoachievethesdgs
AT petrovamaria anassessmentofrequirementsininvestmentsnewtechnologiesandinfrastructurestoachievethesdgs
AT dinismariaalzirapimenta anassessmentofrequirementsininvestmentsnewtechnologiesandinfrastructurestoachievethesdgs
AT yangpeter anassessmentofrequirementsininvestmentsnewtechnologiesandinfrastructurestoachievethesdgs
AT rogerssteven anassessmentofrequirementsininvestmentsnewtechnologiesandinfrastructurestoachievethesdgs
AT alvarezcastanonlorena anassessmentofrequirementsininvestmentsnewtechnologiesandinfrastructurestoachievethesdgs
AT djekicilija anassessmentofrequirementsininvestmentsnewtechnologiesandinfrastructurestoachievethesdgs
AT sharifiayyoob anassessmentofrequirementsininvestmentsnewtechnologiesandinfrastructurestoachievethesdgs
AT neivasamara anassessmentofrequirementsininvestmentsnewtechnologiesandinfrastructurestoachievethesdgs
AT lealfilhowalter assessmentofrequirementsininvestmentsnewtechnologiesandinfrastructurestoachievethesdgs
AT vidaldiogoguedes assessmentofrequirementsininvestmentsnewtechnologiesandinfrastructurestoachievethesdgs
AT chenchen assessmentofrequirementsininvestmentsnewtechnologiesandinfrastructurestoachievethesdgs
AT petrovamaria assessmentofrequirementsininvestmentsnewtechnologiesandinfrastructurestoachievethesdgs
AT dinismariaalzirapimenta assessmentofrequirementsininvestmentsnewtechnologiesandinfrastructurestoachievethesdgs
AT yangpeter assessmentofrequirementsininvestmentsnewtechnologiesandinfrastructurestoachievethesdgs
AT rogerssteven assessmentofrequirementsininvestmentsnewtechnologiesandinfrastructurestoachievethesdgs
AT alvarezcastanonlorena assessmentofrequirementsininvestmentsnewtechnologiesandinfrastructurestoachievethesdgs
AT djekicilija assessmentofrequirementsininvestmentsnewtechnologiesandinfrastructurestoachievethesdgs
AT sharifiayyoob assessmentofrequirementsininvestmentsnewtechnologiesandinfrastructurestoachievethesdgs
AT neivasamara assessmentofrequirementsininvestmentsnewtechnologiesandinfrastructurestoachievethesdgs