Cargando…

How to select interventions for promoting physical activity in schools? Combining preferences of stakeholders and scientists

BACKGROUND: The failure to scale-up and implement physical activity (PA) interventions in real world contexts, which were previously successful under controlled conditions, may be attributed to the different criteria of stakeholders and scientists in the selection process of available interventions....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brandes, Mirko, Brandes, Berit, Sell, Louisa, Sacheck, Jennifer M., Chinapaw, Mai, Lubans, David R., Woll, Alexander, Schipperijn, Jasper, Jago, Russell, Busse, Heide
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10127415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37098620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-023-01452-y
_version_ 1785030459657289728
author Brandes, Mirko
Brandes, Berit
Sell, Louisa
Sacheck, Jennifer M.
Chinapaw, Mai
Lubans, David R.
Woll, Alexander
Schipperijn, Jasper
Jago, Russell
Busse, Heide
author_facet Brandes, Mirko
Brandes, Berit
Sell, Louisa
Sacheck, Jennifer M.
Chinapaw, Mai
Lubans, David R.
Woll, Alexander
Schipperijn, Jasper
Jago, Russell
Busse, Heide
author_sort Brandes, Mirko
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The failure to scale-up and implement physical activity (PA) interventions in real world contexts, which were previously successful under controlled conditions, may be attributed to the different criteria of stakeholders and scientists in the selection process of available interventions. Therefore, the aim of our study was to investigate and compare the criteria applied by local stakeholders and scientists for selecting amongst suitable school-based PA interventions for implementation. METHODS: We conducted a three-round repeated survey Delphi study with local stakeholders (n = 7; Bremen, Germany) and international scientific PA experts (n = 6). Independently for both panels, two rounds were utilized to develop a list of criteria and the definitions of criteria, followed by a prioritization of the criteria in the third round. For each panel, a narrative analysis was used to rank-order unique criteria, list the number of scorers for the unique criteria and synthesize criteria into overarching categories. RESULTS: The stakeholders developed a list of 53 unique criteria, synthesized into 11 categories with top-ranked criteria being ‘free of costs’, ‘longevity’ and ‘integration into everyday school life’. The scientists listed 35 unique criteria, synthesized into 7 categories with the top-ranked criteria being ‘efficacy’, ‘potential for reach’ and ‘feasibility’. The top ranked unique criteria in the stakeholder panel were distributed over many categories, whereas four out of the top six criteria in the scientist panel were related to ‘evidence’. CONCLUSIONS: Although stakeholders and scientists identified similar criteria, major differences were disclosed in the prioritization of the criteria. We recommend an early collaboration of stakeholders and scientists in the design, implementation, and evaluation of PA interventions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12966-023-01452-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10127415
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101274152023-04-26 How to select interventions for promoting physical activity in schools? Combining preferences of stakeholders and scientists Brandes, Mirko Brandes, Berit Sell, Louisa Sacheck, Jennifer M. Chinapaw, Mai Lubans, David R. Woll, Alexander Schipperijn, Jasper Jago, Russell Busse, Heide Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Research BACKGROUND: The failure to scale-up and implement physical activity (PA) interventions in real world contexts, which were previously successful under controlled conditions, may be attributed to the different criteria of stakeholders and scientists in the selection process of available interventions. Therefore, the aim of our study was to investigate and compare the criteria applied by local stakeholders and scientists for selecting amongst suitable school-based PA interventions for implementation. METHODS: We conducted a three-round repeated survey Delphi study with local stakeholders (n = 7; Bremen, Germany) and international scientific PA experts (n = 6). Independently for both panels, two rounds were utilized to develop a list of criteria and the definitions of criteria, followed by a prioritization of the criteria in the third round. For each panel, a narrative analysis was used to rank-order unique criteria, list the number of scorers for the unique criteria and synthesize criteria into overarching categories. RESULTS: The stakeholders developed a list of 53 unique criteria, synthesized into 11 categories with top-ranked criteria being ‘free of costs’, ‘longevity’ and ‘integration into everyday school life’. The scientists listed 35 unique criteria, synthesized into 7 categories with the top-ranked criteria being ‘efficacy’, ‘potential for reach’ and ‘feasibility’. The top ranked unique criteria in the stakeholder panel were distributed over many categories, whereas four out of the top six criteria in the scientist panel were related to ‘evidence’. CONCLUSIONS: Although stakeholders and scientists identified similar criteria, major differences were disclosed in the prioritization of the criteria. We recommend an early collaboration of stakeholders and scientists in the design, implementation, and evaluation of PA interventions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12966-023-01452-y. BioMed Central 2023-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10127415/ /pubmed/37098620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-023-01452-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Brandes, Mirko
Brandes, Berit
Sell, Louisa
Sacheck, Jennifer M.
Chinapaw, Mai
Lubans, David R.
Woll, Alexander
Schipperijn, Jasper
Jago, Russell
Busse, Heide
How to select interventions for promoting physical activity in schools? Combining preferences of stakeholders and scientists
title How to select interventions for promoting physical activity in schools? Combining preferences of stakeholders and scientists
title_full How to select interventions for promoting physical activity in schools? Combining preferences of stakeholders and scientists
title_fullStr How to select interventions for promoting physical activity in schools? Combining preferences of stakeholders and scientists
title_full_unstemmed How to select interventions for promoting physical activity in schools? Combining preferences of stakeholders and scientists
title_short How to select interventions for promoting physical activity in schools? Combining preferences of stakeholders and scientists
title_sort how to select interventions for promoting physical activity in schools? combining preferences of stakeholders and scientists
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10127415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37098620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-023-01452-y
work_keys_str_mv AT brandesmirko howtoselectinterventionsforpromotingphysicalactivityinschoolscombiningpreferencesofstakeholdersandscientists
AT brandesberit howtoselectinterventionsforpromotingphysicalactivityinschoolscombiningpreferencesofstakeholdersandscientists
AT selllouisa howtoselectinterventionsforpromotingphysicalactivityinschoolscombiningpreferencesofstakeholdersandscientists
AT sacheckjenniferm howtoselectinterventionsforpromotingphysicalactivityinschoolscombiningpreferencesofstakeholdersandscientists
AT chinapawmai howtoselectinterventionsforpromotingphysicalactivityinschoolscombiningpreferencesofstakeholdersandscientists
AT lubansdavidr howtoselectinterventionsforpromotingphysicalactivityinschoolscombiningpreferencesofstakeholdersandscientists
AT wollalexander howtoselectinterventionsforpromotingphysicalactivityinschoolscombiningpreferencesofstakeholdersandscientists
AT schipperijnjasper howtoselectinterventionsforpromotingphysicalactivityinschoolscombiningpreferencesofstakeholdersandscientists
AT jagorussell howtoselectinterventionsforpromotingphysicalactivityinschoolscombiningpreferencesofstakeholdersandscientists
AT busseheide howtoselectinterventionsforpromotingphysicalactivityinschoolscombiningpreferencesofstakeholdersandscientists