Empathy or Counter-Empathy? The Victims’ Empathic Response Toward Offenders Depends on Their Relationships and Transgression Severity

INTRODUCTION: Empathy facilitates prosocial behaviors, whereas counter-empathy harms others. The question that remains unanswered is: when and for whom do people show different empathic responses? This study aimed to explore the effects of transgression severity and interpersonal relationships on victims’ empathy or counter-empathy toward an offender. METHODS: Before and after experiencing a slight or serious transgression, 42 college students were asked to imagine that they had different relationships (ie, intimate, strange, or bad) with a person and then report their empathy or counter-empathy toward that person from cognitive and affective aspects. RESULTS: The results showed that, in the affective aspect, the participants’ empathy for the intimate friend decreased after a slight transgression and even disappeared after a serious transgression. For strangers, empathy transformed into counter-empathy after the transgression, and its intensity increased with the transgression’s severity. For a person in a bad relationship, the participants felt counter-empathy before the transgression, and its intensity increased with the transgression’s severity. In the cognitive aspect, participants’ counter-empathy toward the stranger and the person in a bad relationship increased with transgression severity. DISCUSSION: These results suggest that interpersonal relationships and transgression severity can change the type and degree of a victim’s empathy toward the offender. Our findings not only deepen our understanding of the cognitive aspect of counter-empathy but also provide insights for handling interpersonal conflict.