Cargando…
The influence of H(2) partial pressure on biogenic palladium nanoparticle production assessed by single‐cell ICP‐mass spectrometry
The production of biogenic palladium nanoparticles (bio‐Pd NPs) is widely studied due to their high catalytic activity, which depends on the size of nanoparticles (NPs). Smaller NPs (here defined as <100 nm) are more efficient due to their higher surface/volume ratio. In this work, inductively co...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10128129/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36106503 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.14140 |
Sumario: | The production of biogenic palladium nanoparticles (bio‐Pd NPs) is widely studied due to their high catalytic activity, which depends on the size of nanoparticles (NPs). Smaller NPs (here defined as <100 nm) are more efficient due to their higher surface/volume ratio. In this work, inductively coupled plasma‐mass spectrometry (ICP‐MS), flow cytometry (FCM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were combined to obtain insight into the formation of these bio‐Pd NPs. The precipitation of bio‐Pd NPs was evaluated on a cell‐per‐cell basis using single‐cell ICP‐MS (SC‐ICP‐MS) combined with TEM images to assess how homogenously the particles were distributed over the cells. The results provided by SC‐ICP‐MS were consistent with those provided by “bulk” ICP‐MS analysis and FCM. It was observed that heterogeneity in the distribution of palladium over an entire cell population is strongly dependent on the Pd(2+) concentration, biomass and partial H(2) pressure. The latter three parameters affected the particle size, ranging from 15.6 to 560 nm, and exerted a significant impact on the production of the bio‐Pd NPs. The TEM combined with SC‐ICP‐MS revealed that the mass distribution for bacteria with high Pd content (144 fg Pd cell(−1)) indicated the presence of a large number of very small NPs (D50 = 15.6 nm). These results were obtained at high cell density (1 × 10(5) ± 3 × 10(4) cells μl(−1)) and H(2) partial pressure (180 ml H(2)). In contrast, very large particles (D50 = 560 nm) were observed at low cell density (3 × 10(4) ± 10 × 10(2) cells μl(−1)) and H(2) partial pressure (10–100 ml H(2)). The influence of the H(2) partial pressure on the nanoparticle size and the possibility of size‐tuned nanoparticles are presented. |
---|