Cargando…
A Comparison of the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Dapagliflozin Formate, an Ester Prodrug of Dapagliflozin, to Dapagliflozin Propanediol Monohydrate in Healthy Subjects
BACKGROUND: Dapagliflozin formate (DAP-FOR, DA-2811), an ester prodrug of dapagliflozin, was developed to improve the stability and pharmaceutical manufacturing process of dapagliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor. PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PKs) and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10128151/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37113469 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S404182 |
_version_ | 1785030549685927936 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Hyun Chul Lee, Sangmi Sung, Siyoung Kim, Eunjin Jang, In-Jin Chung, Jae-Yong |
author_facet | Kim, Hyun Chul Lee, Sangmi Sung, Siyoung Kim, Eunjin Jang, In-Jin Chung, Jae-Yong |
author_sort | Kim, Hyun Chul |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Dapagliflozin formate (DAP-FOR, DA-2811), an ester prodrug of dapagliflozin, was developed to improve the stability and pharmaceutical manufacturing process of dapagliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor. PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PKs) and safety of dapagliflozin for DAP-FOR compared to those for dapagliflozin propanediol monohydrate (DAP-PDH, Forxiga) in healthy subjects. METHODS: This was an open-label, randomized, single-dose, two-period, two-sequence crossover study. The subjects received a single dose of DAP-FOR or DAP-PDH 10 mg in each period, with a 7-day washout. Serial blood samples for PK analysis were collected up to 48 hours after a single administration to determine plasma concentrations of DAP-FOR and dapagliflozin. PK parameters were calculated using a non-compartmental method and compared between the two drugs. RESULTS: In total, 28 subjects completed the study. DAP-FOR plasma concentrations were not detected in all of the blood sampling time points except for one time point in one subject, and the corresponding DAP-FOR plasma concentration in the subject was close to the lower limit of quantification. The mean plasma concentration–time profiles of dapagliflozin were comparable between the two drugs. The geometric mean ratios and its 90% confidence intervals of the maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration–time curve of dapagliflozin for DAP-FOR to DAP-PDH were within the conventional bioequivalence range of 0.80–1.25. Both drugs were well-tolerated, with a similar incidence of adverse drug reactions. CONCLUSION: The rapid conversion of DAP-FOR into dapagliflozin led to the extremely low exposure of DAP-FOR and comparable PK profiles of dapagliflozin between DAP-FOR and DAP-PDH. The safety profiles were also similar between the two drugs. These results suggest that DAP-FOR can be used as an alternative to DAP-PDH. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10128151 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101281512023-04-26 A Comparison of the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Dapagliflozin Formate, an Ester Prodrug of Dapagliflozin, to Dapagliflozin Propanediol Monohydrate in Healthy Subjects Kim, Hyun Chul Lee, Sangmi Sung, Siyoung Kim, Eunjin Jang, In-Jin Chung, Jae-Yong Drug Des Devel Ther Clinical Trial Report BACKGROUND: Dapagliflozin formate (DAP-FOR, DA-2811), an ester prodrug of dapagliflozin, was developed to improve the stability and pharmaceutical manufacturing process of dapagliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor. PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PKs) and safety of dapagliflozin for DAP-FOR compared to those for dapagliflozin propanediol monohydrate (DAP-PDH, Forxiga) in healthy subjects. METHODS: This was an open-label, randomized, single-dose, two-period, two-sequence crossover study. The subjects received a single dose of DAP-FOR or DAP-PDH 10 mg in each period, with a 7-day washout. Serial blood samples for PK analysis were collected up to 48 hours after a single administration to determine plasma concentrations of DAP-FOR and dapagliflozin. PK parameters were calculated using a non-compartmental method and compared between the two drugs. RESULTS: In total, 28 subjects completed the study. DAP-FOR plasma concentrations were not detected in all of the blood sampling time points except for one time point in one subject, and the corresponding DAP-FOR plasma concentration in the subject was close to the lower limit of quantification. The mean plasma concentration–time profiles of dapagliflozin were comparable between the two drugs. The geometric mean ratios and its 90% confidence intervals of the maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration–time curve of dapagliflozin for DAP-FOR to DAP-PDH were within the conventional bioequivalence range of 0.80–1.25. Both drugs were well-tolerated, with a similar incidence of adverse drug reactions. CONCLUSION: The rapid conversion of DAP-FOR into dapagliflozin led to the extremely low exposure of DAP-FOR and comparable PK profiles of dapagliflozin between DAP-FOR and DAP-PDH. The safety profiles were also similar between the two drugs. These results suggest that DAP-FOR can be used as an alternative to DAP-PDH. Dove 2023-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10128151/ /pubmed/37113469 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S404182 Text en © 2023 Kim et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Clinical Trial Report Kim, Hyun Chul Lee, Sangmi Sung, Siyoung Kim, Eunjin Jang, In-Jin Chung, Jae-Yong A Comparison of the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Dapagliflozin Formate, an Ester Prodrug of Dapagliflozin, to Dapagliflozin Propanediol Monohydrate in Healthy Subjects |
title | A Comparison of the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Dapagliflozin Formate, an Ester Prodrug of Dapagliflozin, to Dapagliflozin Propanediol Monohydrate in Healthy Subjects |
title_full | A Comparison of the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Dapagliflozin Formate, an Ester Prodrug of Dapagliflozin, to Dapagliflozin Propanediol Monohydrate in Healthy Subjects |
title_fullStr | A Comparison of the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Dapagliflozin Formate, an Ester Prodrug of Dapagliflozin, to Dapagliflozin Propanediol Monohydrate in Healthy Subjects |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison of the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Dapagliflozin Formate, an Ester Prodrug of Dapagliflozin, to Dapagliflozin Propanediol Monohydrate in Healthy Subjects |
title_short | A Comparison of the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Dapagliflozin Formate, an Ester Prodrug of Dapagliflozin, to Dapagliflozin Propanediol Monohydrate in Healthy Subjects |
title_sort | comparison of the pharmacokinetics and safety of dapagliflozin formate, an ester prodrug of dapagliflozin, to dapagliflozin propanediol monohydrate in healthy subjects |
topic | Clinical Trial Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10128151/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37113469 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S404182 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimhyunchul acomparisonofthepharmacokineticsandsafetyofdapagliflozinformateanesterprodrugofdapagliflozintodapagliflozinpropanediolmonohydrateinhealthysubjects AT leesangmi acomparisonofthepharmacokineticsandsafetyofdapagliflozinformateanesterprodrugofdapagliflozintodapagliflozinpropanediolmonohydrateinhealthysubjects AT sungsiyoung acomparisonofthepharmacokineticsandsafetyofdapagliflozinformateanesterprodrugofdapagliflozintodapagliflozinpropanediolmonohydrateinhealthysubjects AT kimeunjin acomparisonofthepharmacokineticsandsafetyofdapagliflozinformateanesterprodrugofdapagliflozintodapagliflozinpropanediolmonohydrateinhealthysubjects AT janginjin acomparisonofthepharmacokineticsandsafetyofdapagliflozinformateanesterprodrugofdapagliflozintodapagliflozinpropanediolmonohydrateinhealthysubjects AT chungjaeyong acomparisonofthepharmacokineticsandsafetyofdapagliflozinformateanesterprodrugofdapagliflozintodapagliflozinpropanediolmonohydrateinhealthysubjects AT kimhyunchul comparisonofthepharmacokineticsandsafetyofdapagliflozinformateanesterprodrugofdapagliflozintodapagliflozinpropanediolmonohydrateinhealthysubjects AT leesangmi comparisonofthepharmacokineticsandsafetyofdapagliflozinformateanesterprodrugofdapagliflozintodapagliflozinpropanediolmonohydrateinhealthysubjects AT sungsiyoung comparisonofthepharmacokineticsandsafetyofdapagliflozinformateanesterprodrugofdapagliflozintodapagliflozinpropanediolmonohydrateinhealthysubjects AT kimeunjin comparisonofthepharmacokineticsandsafetyofdapagliflozinformateanesterprodrugofdapagliflozintodapagliflozinpropanediolmonohydrateinhealthysubjects AT janginjin comparisonofthepharmacokineticsandsafetyofdapagliflozinformateanesterprodrugofdapagliflozintodapagliflozinpropanediolmonohydrateinhealthysubjects AT chungjaeyong comparisonofthepharmacokineticsandsafetyofdapagliflozinformateanesterprodrugofdapagliflozintodapagliflozinpropanediolmonohydrateinhealthysubjects |