Cargando…

A Comparison of the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Dapagliflozin Formate, an Ester Prodrug of Dapagliflozin, to Dapagliflozin Propanediol Monohydrate in Healthy Subjects

BACKGROUND: Dapagliflozin formate (DAP-FOR, DA-2811), an ester prodrug of dapagliflozin, was developed to improve the stability and pharmaceutical manufacturing process of dapagliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor. PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PKs) and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Hyun Chul, Lee, Sangmi, Sung, Siyoung, Kim, Eunjin, Jang, In-Jin, Chung, Jae-Yong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10128151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37113469
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S404182
_version_ 1785030549685927936
author Kim, Hyun Chul
Lee, Sangmi
Sung, Siyoung
Kim, Eunjin
Jang, In-Jin
Chung, Jae-Yong
author_facet Kim, Hyun Chul
Lee, Sangmi
Sung, Siyoung
Kim, Eunjin
Jang, In-Jin
Chung, Jae-Yong
author_sort Kim, Hyun Chul
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Dapagliflozin formate (DAP-FOR, DA-2811), an ester prodrug of dapagliflozin, was developed to improve the stability and pharmaceutical manufacturing process of dapagliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor. PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PKs) and safety of dapagliflozin for DAP-FOR compared to those for dapagliflozin propanediol monohydrate (DAP-PDH, Forxiga) in healthy subjects. METHODS: This was an open-label, randomized, single-dose, two-period, two-sequence crossover study. The subjects received a single dose of DAP-FOR or DAP-PDH 10 mg in each period, with a 7-day washout. Serial blood samples for PK analysis were collected up to 48 hours after a single administration to determine plasma concentrations of DAP-FOR and dapagliflozin. PK parameters were calculated using a non-compartmental method and compared between the two drugs. RESULTS: In total, 28 subjects completed the study. DAP-FOR plasma concentrations were not detected in all of the blood sampling time points except for one time point in one subject, and the corresponding DAP-FOR plasma concentration in the subject was close to the lower limit of quantification. The mean plasma concentration–time profiles of dapagliflozin were comparable between the two drugs. The geometric mean ratios and its 90% confidence intervals of the maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration–time curve of dapagliflozin for DAP-FOR to DAP-PDH were within the conventional bioequivalence range of 0.80–1.25. Both drugs were well-tolerated, with a similar incidence of adverse drug reactions. CONCLUSION: The rapid conversion of DAP-FOR into dapagliflozin led to the extremely low exposure of DAP-FOR and comparable PK profiles of dapagliflozin between DAP-FOR and DAP-PDH. The safety profiles were also similar between the two drugs. These results suggest that DAP-FOR can be used as an alternative to DAP-PDH.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10128151
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101281512023-04-26 A Comparison of the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Dapagliflozin Formate, an Ester Prodrug of Dapagliflozin, to Dapagliflozin Propanediol Monohydrate in Healthy Subjects Kim, Hyun Chul Lee, Sangmi Sung, Siyoung Kim, Eunjin Jang, In-Jin Chung, Jae-Yong Drug Des Devel Ther Clinical Trial Report BACKGROUND: Dapagliflozin formate (DAP-FOR, DA-2811), an ester prodrug of dapagliflozin, was developed to improve the stability and pharmaceutical manufacturing process of dapagliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor. PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PKs) and safety of dapagliflozin for DAP-FOR compared to those for dapagliflozin propanediol monohydrate (DAP-PDH, Forxiga) in healthy subjects. METHODS: This was an open-label, randomized, single-dose, two-period, two-sequence crossover study. The subjects received a single dose of DAP-FOR or DAP-PDH 10 mg in each period, with a 7-day washout. Serial blood samples for PK analysis were collected up to 48 hours after a single administration to determine plasma concentrations of DAP-FOR and dapagliflozin. PK parameters were calculated using a non-compartmental method and compared between the two drugs. RESULTS: In total, 28 subjects completed the study. DAP-FOR plasma concentrations were not detected in all of the blood sampling time points except for one time point in one subject, and the corresponding DAP-FOR plasma concentration in the subject was close to the lower limit of quantification. The mean plasma concentration–time profiles of dapagliflozin were comparable between the two drugs. The geometric mean ratios and its 90% confidence intervals of the maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration–time curve of dapagliflozin for DAP-FOR to DAP-PDH were within the conventional bioequivalence range of 0.80–1.25. Both drugs were well-tolerated, with a similar incidence of adverse drug reactions. CONCLUSION: The rapid conversion of DAP-FOR into dapagliflozin led to the extremely low exposure of DAP-FOR and comparable PK profiles of dapagliflozin between DAP-FOR and DAP-PDH. The safety profiles were also similar between the two drugs. These results suggest that DAP-FOR can be used as an alternative to DAP-PDH. Dove 2023-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10128151/ /pubmed/37113469 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S404182 Text en © 2023 Kim et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Clinical Trial Report
Kim, Hyun Chul
Lee, Sangmi
Sung, Siyoung
Kim, Eunjin
Jang, In-Jin
Chung, Jae-Yong
A Comparison of the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Dapagliflozin Formate, an Ester Prodrug of Dapagliflozin, to Dapagliflozin Propanediol Monohydrate in Healthy Subjects
title A Comparison of the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Dapagliflozin Formate, an Ester Prodrug of Dapagliflozin, to Dapagliflozin Propanediol Monohydrate in Healthy Subjects
title_full A Comparison of the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Dapagliflozin Formate, an Ester Prodrug of Dapagliflozin, to Dapagliflozin Propanediol Monohydrate in Healthy Subjects
title_fullStr A Comparison of the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Dapagliflozin Formate, an Ester Prodrug of Dapagliflozin, to Dapagliflozin Propanediol Monohydrate in Healthy Subjects
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Dapagliflozin Formate, an Ester Prodrug of Dapagliflozin, to Dapagliflozin Propanediol Monohydrate in Healthy Subjects
title_short A Comparison of the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Dapagliflozin Formate, an Ester Prodrug of Dapagliflozin, to Dapagliflozin Propanediol Monohydrate in Healthy Subjects
title_sort comparison of the pharmacokinetics and safety of dapagliflozin formate, an ester prodrug of dapagliflozin, to dapagliflozin propanediol monohydrate in healthy subjects
topic Clinical Trial Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10128151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37113469
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S404182
work_keys_str_mv AT kimhyunchul acomparisonofthepharmacokineticsandsafetyofdapagliflozinformateanesterprodrugofdapagliflozintodapagliflozinpropanediolmonohydrateinhealthysubjects
AT leesangmi acomparisonofthepharmacokineticsandsafetyofdapagliflozinformateanesterprodrugofdapagliflozintodapagliflozinpropanediolmonohydrateinhealthysubjects
AT sungsiyoung acomparisonofthepharmacokineticsandsafetyofdapagliflozinformateanesterprodrugofdapagliflozintodapagliflozinpropanediolmonohydrateinhealthysubjects
AT kimeunjin acomparisonofthepharmacokineticsandsafetyofdapagliflozinformateanesterprodrugofdapagliflozintodapagliflozinpropanediolmonohydrateinhealthysubjects
AT janginjin acomparisonofthepharmacokineticsandsafetyofdapagliflozinformateanesterprodrugofdapagliflozintodapagliflozinpropanediolmonohydrateinhealthysubjects
AT chungjaeyong acomparisonofthepharmacokineticsandsafetyofdapagliflozinformateanesterprodrugofdapagliflozintodapagliflozinpropanediolmonohydrateinhealthysubjects
AT kimhyunchul comparisonofthepharmacokineticsandsafetyofdapagliflozinformateanesterprodrugofdapagliflozintodapagliflozinpropanediolmonohydrateinhealthysubjects
AT leesangmi comparisonofthepharmacokineticsandsafetyofdapagliflozinformateanesterprodrugofdapagliflozintodapagliflozinpropanediolmonohydrateinhealthysubjects
AT sungsiyoung comparisonofthepharmacokineticsandsafetyofdapagliflozinformateanesterprodrugofdapagliflozintodapagliflozinpropanediolmonohydrateinhealthysubjects
AT kimeunjin comparisonofthepharmacokineticsandsafetyofdapagliflozinformateanesterprodrugofdapagliflozintodapagliflozinpropanediolmonohydrateinhealthysubjects
AT janginjin comparisonofthepharmacokineticsandsafetyofdapagliflozinformateanesterprodrugofdapagliflozintodapagliflozinpropanediolmonohydrateinhealthysubjects
AT chungjaeyong comparisonofthepharmacokineticsandsafetyofdapagliflozinformateanesterprodrugofdapagliflozintodapagliflozinpropanediolmonohydrateinhealthysubjects