Cargando…

Age, experience, social goals, and engagement with research scientists may promote innovation in ecological restoration

Innovation in ecological restoration is necessary to achieve the ambitious targets established in United Nations conventions and other global restoration initiatives. Innovation is also crucial for navigating uncertainties in repairing and restoring ecosystems, and thus practitioners often develop i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohr, Jakki J., Cummins, Tina M., Floyd, Theresa M., Metcalf, Elizabeth Covelli, Callaway, Ragan M., Nelson, Cara R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10128931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37098011
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274153
_version_ 1785030619717173248
author Mohr, Jakki J.
Cummins, Tina M.
Floyd, Theresa M.
Metcalf, Elizabeth Covelli
Callaway, Ragan M.
Nelson, Cara R.
author_facet Mohr, Jakki J.
Cummins, Tina M.
Floyd, Theresa M.
Metcalf, Elizabeth Covelli
Callaway, Ragan M.
Nelson, Cara R.
author_sort Mohr, Jakki J.
collection PubMed
description Innovation in ecological restoration is necessary to achieve the ambitious targets established in United Nations conventions and other global restoration initiatives. Innovation is also crucial for navigating uncertainties in repairing and restoring ecosystems, and thus practitioners often develop innovations at project design and implementation stages. However, innovation in ecological restoration can be hindered by many factors (e.g., time and budget constraints, and project complexity). Theory and research on innovation has been formally applied in many fields, yet explicit study of innovation in ecological restoration remains nascent. To assess the use of innovation in restoration projects, including its drivers and inhibitors, we conducted a social survey of restoration practitioners in the United States. Specifically, we assessed relationships between project-based innovation and traits of the individual practitioner (including, for example, age, gender, experience); company (including, for example, company size and company’s inclusion of social goals); project (including, for example, complexity and uncertainty); and project outcomes (such as completing the project on time/on budget and personal satisfaction with the work). We found positive relationships between project-based innovation and practitioner traits (age, gender, experience, engagement with research scientists), one company trait (company’s inclusion of social goals in their portfolio), and project traits (project complexity and length). In contrast, two practitioner traits, risk aversion and the use of industry-specific information, were negatively related to project-based innovation. Satisfaction with project outcomes was positively correlated with project-based innovation. Collectively, the results provide insights into the drivers and inhibitors of innovation in restoration and suggest opportunities for research and application.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10128931
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101289312023-04-26 Age, experience, social goals, and engagement with research scientists may promote innovation in ecological restoration Mohr, Jakki J. Cummins, Tina M. Floyd, Theresa M. Metcalf, Elizabeth Covelli Callaway, Ragan M. Nelson, Cara R. PLoS One Research Article Innovation in ecological restoration is necessary to achieve the ambitious targets established in United Nations conventions and other global restoration initiatives. Innovation is also crucial for navigating uncertainties in repairing and restoring ecosystems, and thus practitioners often develop innovations at project design and implementation stages. However, innovation in ecological restoration can be hindered by many factors (e.g., time and budget constraints, and project complexity). Theory and research on innovation has been formally applied in many fields, yet explicit study of innovation in ecological restoration remains nascent. To assess the use of innovation in restoration projects, including its drivers and inhibitors, we conducted a social survey of restoration practitioners in the United States. Specifically, we assessed relationships between project-based innovation and traits of the individual practitioner (including, for example, age, gender, experience); company (including, for example, company size and company’s inclusion of social goals); project (including, for example, complexity and uncertainty); and project outcomes (such as completing the project on time/on budget and personal satisfaction with the work). We found positive relationships between project-based innovation and practitioner traits (age, gender, experience, engagement with research scientists), one company trait (company’s inclusion of social goals in their portfolio), and project traits (project complexity and length). In contrast, two practitioner traits, risk aversion and the use of industry-specific information, were negatively related to project-based innovation. Satisfaction with project outcomes was positively correlated with project-based innovation. Collectively, the results provide insights into the drivers and inhibitors of innovation in restoration and suggest opportunities for research and application. Public Library of Science 2023-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10128931/ /pubmed/37098011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274153 Text en © 2023 Mohr et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mohr, Jakki J.
Cummins, Tina M.
Floyd, Theresa M.
Metcalf, Elizabeth Covelli
Callaway, Ragan M.
Nelson, Cara R.
Age, experience, social goals, and engagement with research scientists may promote innovation in ecological restoration
title Age, experience, social goals, and engagement with research scientists may promote innovation in ecological restoration
title_full Age, experience, social goals, and engagement with research scientists may promote innovation in ecological restoration
title_fullStr Age, experience, social goals, and engagement with research scientists may promote innovation in ecological restoration
title_full_unstemmed Age, experience, social goals, and engagement with research scientists may promote innovation in ecological restoration
title_short Age, experience, social goals, and engagement with research scientists may promote innovation in ecological restoration
title_sort age, experience, social goals, and engagement with research scientists may promote innovation in ecological restoration
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10128931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37098011
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274153
work_keys_str_mv AT mohrjakkij ageexperiencesocialgoalsandengagementwithresearchscientistsmaypromoteinnovationinecologicalrestoration
AT cumminstinam ageexperiencesocialgoalsandengagementwithresearchscientistsmaypromoteinnovationinecologicalrestoration
AT floydtheresam ageexperiencesocialgoalsandengagementwithresearchscientistsmaypromoteinnovationinecologicalrestoration
AT metcalfelizabethcovelli ageexperiencesocialgoalsandengagementwithresearchscientistsmaypromoteinnovationinecologicalrestoration
AT callawayraganm ageexperiencesocialgoalsandengagementwithresearchscientistsmaypromoteinnovationinecologicalrestoration
AT nelsoncarar ageexperiencesocialgoalsandengagementwithresearchscientistsmaypromoteinnovationinecologicalrestoration