Cargando…
Intravascular ultrasound imaging in evaluation of aortic stiffness: A proof-of-concept study
BACKGROUND: Aortic stiffness is a well-known cardio-vascular risk factor. For years, different methods have been studied in the assessment of aortic elastic properties and large arterial stiffness for risk stratification. Herein is an assessment of the role of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Via Medica
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10129260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33438178 http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/CJ.a2021.0003 |
_version_ | 1785030694798360576 |
---|---|
author | Mileva, Niya Boykova Vassilev, Dobrin Iotkov |
author_facet | Mileva, Niya Boykova Vassilev, Dobrin Iotkov |
author_sort | Mileva, Niya Boykova |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Aortic stiffness is a well-known cardio-vascular risk factor. For years, different methods have been studied in the assessment of aortic elastic properties and large arterial stiffness for risk stratification. Herein is an assessment of the role of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging for the evaluation of aortic elastic properties. METHODS: Intravascular ultrasound imaging of the aorta was performed in 12 patients with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and computed tomography (CT) evidence for enlargement of the ascending aorta — diameter ≥40.0 mm. Mechanical properties of the aorta were derived from the measured diameters and intra-aortic pressure. Paired samples T-test analyses were performed to determine differences between measurements derived by TTE, CT and IVUS. RESULTS: Mean values of the calculated elastic properties via IVUS of the ascending aorta were as follows: compliance 0.021 ± 0.02; strain 205 ± 4.3; aortic stiffness index 4.3 ± 0.75; elastic modulus 0.31 ± 0.05. On paired T-test analysis maximum ascending aortic diameter measured by CT aortography and IVUS did not differ significantly (t = −0.19, p = 0.985), but a significant difference between IVUS measurements and TTE derived diameters was found (t = 13.118, p = 0.034). On average, IVUS diameters were 2.3 mm larger than the results acquired by TTE (95% confidence interval: 14.21–17.13). CONCLUSIONS: Intravascular ultrasound examination of the ascending aorta provided larger diameters than the ones collected by means of TTE. However, IVUS measurements did not differ significantly from diameters derived by CT aortography. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10129260 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Via Medica |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101292602023-04-26 Intravascular ultrasound imaging in evaluation of aortic stiffness: A proof-of-concept study Mileva, Niya Boykova Vassilev, Dobrin Iotkov Cardiol J Clinical Cardiology BACKGROUND: Aortic stiffness is a well-known cardio-vascular risk factor. For years, different methods have been studied in the assessment of aortic elastic properties and large arterial stiffness for risk stratification. Herein is an assessment of the role of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging for the evaluation of aortic elastic properties. METHODS: Intravascular ultrasound imaging of the aorta was performed in 12 patients with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and computed tomography (CT) evidence for enlargement of the ascending aorta — diameter ≥40.0 mm. Mechanical properties of the aorta were derived from the measured diameters and intra-aortic pressure. Paired samples T-test analyses were performed to determine differences between measurements derived by TTE, CT and IVUS. RESULTS: Mean values of the calculated elastic properties via IVUS of the ascending aorta were as follows: compliance 0.021 ± 0.02; strain 205 ± 4.3; aortic stiffness index 4.3 ± 0.75; elastic modulus 0.31 ± 0.05. On paired T-test analysis maximum ascending aortic diameter measured by CT aortography and IVUS did not differ significantly (t = −0.19, p = 0.985), but a significant difference between IVUS measurements and TTE derived diameters was found (t = 13.118, p = 0.034). On average, IVUS diameters were 2.3 mm larger than the results acquired by TTE (95% confidence interval: 14.21–17.13). CONCLUSIONS: Intravascular ultrasound examination of the ascending aorta provided larger diameters than the ones collected by means of TTE. However, IVUS measurements did not differ significantly from diameters derived by CT aortography. Via Medica 2023-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10129260/ /pubmed/33438178 http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/CJ.a2021.0003 Text en Copyright © 2023 Via Medica https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, allowing to download articles and share them with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially |
spellingShingle | Clinical Cardiology Mileva, Niya Boykova Vassilev, Dobrin Iotkov Intravascular ultrasound imaging in evaluation of aortic stiffness: A proof-of-concept study |
title | Intravascular ultrasound imaging in evaluation of aortic stiffness: A proof-of-concept study |
title_full | Intravascular ultrasound imaging in evaluation of aortic stiffness: A proof-of-concept study |
title_fullStr | Intravascular ultrasound imaging in evaluation of aortic stiffness: A proof-of-concept study |
title_full_unstemmed | Intravascular ultrasound imaging in evaluation of aortic stiffness: A proof-of-concept study |
title_short | Intravascular ultrasound imaging in evaluation of aortic stiffness: A proof-of-concept study |
title_sort | intravascular ultrasound imaging in evaluation of aortic stiffness: a proof-of-concept study |
topic | Clinical Cardiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10129260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33438178 http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/CJ.a2021.0003 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT milevaniyaboykova intravascularultrasoundimaginginevaluationofaorticstiffnessaproofofconceptstudy AT vassilevdobriniotkov intravascularultrasoundimaginginevaluationofaorticstiffnessaproofofconceptstudy |