Cargando…

Intravascular ultrasound imaging in evaluation of aortic stiffness: A proof-of-concept study

BACKGROUND: Aortic stiffness is a well-known cardio-vascular risk factor. For years, different methods have been studied in the assessment of aortic elastic properties and large arterial stiffness for risk stratification. Herein is an assessment of the role of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mileva, Niya Boykova, Vassilev, Dobrin Iotkov
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Via Medica 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10129260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33438178
http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/CJ.a2021.0003
_version_ 1785030694798360576
author Mileva, Niya Boykova
Vassilev, Dobrin Iotkov
author_facet Mileva, Niya Boykova
Vassilev, Dobrin Iotkov
author_sort Mileva, Niya Boykova
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Aortic stiffness is a well-known cardio-vascular risk factor. For years, different methods have been studied in the assessment of aortic elastic properties and large arterial stiffness for risk stratification. Herein is an assessment of the role of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging for the evaluation of aortic elastic properties. METHODS: Intravascular ultrasound imaging of the aorta was performed in 12 patients with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and computed tomography (CT) evidence for enlargement of the ascending aorta — diameter ≥40.0 mm. Mechanical properties of the aorta were derived from the measured diameters and intra-aortic pressure. Paired samples T-test analyses were performed to determine differences between measurements derived by TTE, CT and IVUS. RESULTS: Mean values of the calculated elastic properties via IVUS of the ascending aorta were as follows: compliance 0.021 ± 0.02; strain 205 ± 4.3; aortic stiffness index 4.3 ± 0.75; elastic modulus 0.31 ± 0.05. On paired T-test analysis maximum ascending aortic diameter measured by CT aortography and IVUS did not differ significantly (t = −0.19, p = 0.985), but a significant difference between IVUS measurements and TTE derived diameters was found (t = 13.118, p = 0.034). On average, IVUS diameters were 2.3 mm larger than the results acquired by TTE (95% confidence interval: 14.21–17.13). CONCLUSIONS: Intravascular ultrasound examination of the ascending aorta provided larger diameters than the ones collected by means of TTE. However, IVUS measurements did not differ significantly from diameters derived by CT aortography.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10129260
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Via Medica
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101292602023-04-26 Intravascular ultrasound imaging in evaluation of aortic stiffness: A proof-of-concept study Mileva, Niya Boykova Vassilev, Dobrin Iotkov Cardiol J Clinical Cardiology BACKGROUND: Aortic stiffness is a well-known cardio-vascular risk factor. For years, different methods have been studied in the assessment of aortic elastic properties and large arterial stiffness for risk stratification. Herein is an assessment of the role of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging for the evaluation of aortic elastic properties. METHODS: Intravascular ultrasound imaging of the aorta was performed in 12 patients with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and computed tomography (CT) evidence for enlargement of the ascending aorta — diameter ≥40.0 mm. Mechanical properties of the aorta were derived from the measured diameters and intra-aortic pressure. Paired samples T-test analyses were performed to determine differences between measurements derived by TTE, CT and IVUS. RESULTS: Mean values of the calculated elastic properties via IVUS of the ascending aorta were as follows: compliance 0.021 ± 0.02; strain 205 ± 4.3; aortic stiffness index 4.3 ± 0.75; elastic modulus 0.31 ± 0.05. On paired T-test analysis maximum ascending aortic diameter measured by CT aortography and IVUS did not differ significantly (t = −0.19, p = 0.985), but a significant difference between IVUS measurements and TTE derived diameters was found (t = 13.118, p = 0.034). On average, IVUS diameters were 2.3 mm larger than the results acquired by TTE (95% confidence interval: 14.21–17.13). CONCLUSIONS: Intravascular ultrasound examination of the ascending aorta provided larger diameters than the ones collected by means of TTE. However, IVUS measurements did not differ significantly from diameters derived by CT aortography. Via Medica 2023-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10129260/ /pubmed/33438178 http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/CJ.a2021.0003 Text en Copyright © 2023 Via Medica https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, allowing to download articles and share them with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially
spellingShingle Clinical Cardiology
Mileva, Niya Boykova
Vassilev, Dobrin Iotkov
Intravascular ultrasound imaging in evaluation of aortic stiffness: A proof-of-concept study
title Intravascular ultrasound imaging in evaluation of aortic stiffness: A proof-of-concept study
title_full Intravascular ultrasound imaging in evaluation of aortic stiffness: A proof-of-concept study
title_fullStr Intravascular ultrasound imaging in evaluation of aortic stiffness: A proof-of-concept study
title_full_unstemmed Intravascular ultrasound imaging in evaluation of aortic stiffness: A proof-of-concept study
title_short Intravascular ultrasound imaging in evaluation of aortic stiffness: A proof-of-concept study
title_sort intravascular ultrasound imaging in evaluation of aortic stiffness: a proof-of-concept study
topic Clinical Cardiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10129260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33438178
http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/CJ.a2021.0003
work_keys_str_mv AT milevaniyaboykova intravascularultrasoundimaginginevaluationofaorticstiffnessaproofofconceptstudy
AT vassilevdobriniotkov intravascularultrasoundimaginginevaluationofaorticstiffnessaproofofconceptstudy