Cargando…
Response shift in hearing related quality of life after cochlear implantation – effect size and clinical significance: a then-test study
BACKGROUND: Quality of life questionnaires are often used in the assessment of rehabilitation of hearing-impaired patients with a cochlear implant. However, a prospective study with a systematic retrospective evaluation of the preoperative quality of life after surgery has not yet been conducted and...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10129310/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37098588 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-023-02118-w |
_version_ | 1785030705191845888 |
---|---|
author | Brill, Ioana Tereza Stark, Thomas Wigers, Lillian Brill, Stefan Michael |
author_facet | Brill, Ioana Tereza Stark, Thomas Wigers, Lillian Brill, Stefan Michael |
author_sort | Brill, Ioana Tereza |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Quality of life questionnaires are often used in the assessment of rehabilitation of hearing-impaired patients with a cochlear implant. However, a prospective study with a systematic retrospective evaluation of the preoperative quality of life after surgery has not yet been conducted and may reveal a change in internal standards, such as a response shift, due to the implantation and hearing rehabilitation. METHODS: The Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ) was used for assessing hearing related quality of life. It has three general domains (physical, psychological and social) and six subdomains. Seventeen patients were tested before (t(0)) and retrospectively (then-test; pre-t(1)) and acutely postoperative (post-t(1)) after cochlear implantation. Observed changes, then-test changes, response shifts and effect sizes were calculated. Non-parametric statistical methods were used. RESULTS: The NCIQ total score was 52.32 ± 18.69 (mean, standard deviation) for t(0), 59.29 ± 14.06 for pre-t(1) and 67.65 ± 26.02 for post-t(1) questioning. The observed change was statistically significant in all domains but in speech production. Response shift was statistically significant in the total score and in part of the domains. The effect sizes for the response shift were moderate (> 0.5) in the total score, psychological, social general scores and subdomains. CONCLUSIONS: In this study we found that response shift does exist in adults with severe to profound hearing loss undergoing cochlear implantation. By advising the participants to deactivate the implant for the then-test, recall bias and noise were minimized. The clinical significance of the response shift was present in the total score and in the social and psychological domains. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was retrospectively registered with the German Clinical Trial Register, TRN DRKS00029467, on 07/08/2022. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10129310 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101293102023-04-27 Response shift in hearing related quality of life after cochlear implantation – effect size and clinical significance: a then-test study Brill, Ioana Tereza Stark, Thomas Wigers, Lillian Brill, Stefan Michael Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: Quality of life questionnaires are often used in the assessment of rehabilitation of hearing-impaired patients with a cochlear implant. However, a prospective study with a systematic retrospective evaluation of the preoperative quality of life after surgery has not yet been conducted and may reveal a change in internal standards, such as a response shift, due to the implantation and hearing rehabilitation. METHODS: The Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ) was used for assessing hearing related quality of life. It has three general domains (physical, psychological and social) and six subdomains. Seventeen patients were tested before (t(0)) and retrospectively (then-test; pre-t(1)) and acutely postoperative (post-t(1)) after cochlear implantation. Observed changes, then-test changes, response shifts and effect sizes were calculated. Non-parametric statistical methods were used. RESULTS: The NCIQ total score was 52.32 ± 18.69 (mean, standard deviation) for t(0), 59.29 ± 14.06 for pre-t(1) and 67.65 ± 26.02 for post-t(1) questioning. The observed change was statistically significant in all domains but in speech production. Response shift was statistically significant in the total score and in part of the domains. The effect sizes for the response shift were moderate (> 0.5) in the total score, psychological, social general scores and subdomains. CONCLUSIONS: In this study we found that response shift does exist in adults with severe to profound hearing loss undergoing cochlear implantation. By advising the participants to deactivate the implant for the then-test, recall bias and noise were minimized. The clinical significance of the response shift was present in the total score and in the social and psychological domains. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was retrospectively registered with the German Clinical Trial Register, TRN DRKS00029467, on 07/08/2022. BioMed Central 2023-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10129310/ /pubmed/37098588 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-023-02118-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Brill, Ioana Tereza Stark, Thomas Wigers, Lillian Brill, Stefan Michael Response shift in hearing related quality of life after cochlear implantation – effect size and clinical significance: a then-test study |
title | Response shift in hearing related quality of life after cochlear implantation – effect size and clinical significance: a then-test study |
title_full | Response shift in hearing related quality of life after cochlear implantation – effect size and clinical significance: a then-test study |
title_fullStr | Response shift in hearing related quality of life after cochlear implantation – effect size and clinical significance: a then-test study |
title_full_unstemmed | Response shift in hearing related quality of life after cochlear implantation – effect size and clinical significance: a then-test study |
title_short | Response shift in hearing related quality of life after cochlear implantation – effect size and clinical significance: a then-test study |
title_sort | response shift in hearing related quality of life after cochlear implantation – effect size and clinical significance: a then-test study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10129310/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37098588 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-023-02118-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brillioanatereza responseshiftinhearingrelatedqualityoflifeaftercochlearimplantationeffectsizeandclinicalsignificanceathenteststudy AT starkthomas responseshiftinhearingrelatedqualityoflifeaftercochlearimplantationeffectsizeandclinicalsignificanceathenteststudy AT wigerslillian responseshiftinhearingrelatedqualityoflifeaftercochlearimplantationeffectsizeandclinicalsignificanceathenteststudy AT brillstefanmichael responseshiftinhearingrelatedqualityoflifeaftercochlearimplantationeffectsizeandclinicalsignificanceathenteststudy |