Cargando…

Use of a Powered Circular Stapler Can Prevent Anastomotic Air Leakage in Robotic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer

OBJECTIVES: Preventing anastomotic complications during rectal cancer surgery is important. Compared with a manual circular stapler, a powered circular stapler is expected to reduce undesirable tension during anastomosis. However, whether a powered circular stapler can reduce anastomotic complicatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nanishi, Kenji, Hino, Hitoshi, Shiomi, Akio, Kagawa, Hiroyasu, Manabe, Shoichi, Yamaoka, Yusuke, Chen, Kai, Maeda, Chikara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Japan Society of Coloproctology 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10129358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37113589
http://dx.doi.org/10.23922/jarc.2022-069
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: Preventing anastomotic complications during rectal cancer surgery is important. Compared with a manual circular stapler, a powered circular stapler is expected to reduce undesirable tension during anastomosis. However, whether a powered circular stapler can reduce anastomotic complications during robotic low anterior resection (Ro-LAR) remains unclear. We aimed to investigate whether the use of a powered circular stapler contributes to safe anastomosis in Ro-LAR. METHODS: A total of 271 patients who underwent Ro-LAR for rectal cancer between April 2019 and April 2022 were included. Depending on the type of device employed, patients were divided into a powered circular stapler group (PCSG) and a manual circular stapler group (MCSG). Clinicopathological features and surgical outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There were no differences in clinicopathological characteristics and surgical outcomes, except for anastomotic outcomes, between the two groups. Patients with positive air leak tests were significantly more in the MCSG (p=0.026; PCSG, 1.5%; MCSG, 8.0%). Frequencies of anastomotic leakage (p=0.486; PCSG, 6.1%; MCSG, 8.9%) and anastomotic bleeding (p=1.000; PCSG, 0.7%; MCSG, 0.8%) were similar between the two groups. Multivariate analysis showed that the use of a powered circular stapler significantly increased the negative leak tests (p=0.020, odds ratio 6.74, 95% confidence interval 1.35-33.56). CONCLUSIONS: Use of a powered circular stapler in Ro-LAR for rectal cancer was significantly associated with a negative air leak test, suggesting that it contributes to stable and safe anastomosis.