Cargando…

Role of perigastric arcade removal in serous epithelial ovarian cancers

INTRODUCTION: Omentectomy is an essential part of cytoreductive surgery (CRS). However, removal of perigastric arcade (PGA) of the omentum is a controversial aspect of omentectomy in view of the fear of injury, vascular compromise and gastroparesis. Hence, we conducted a study to evaluate the necess...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kulkarni, Rohini Vinayak, Mohapatra, Manoranjan, Nayak, Bhagyalaxmi, Samantaray, Sagarika, Mohapatra, Janmejaya, Parija, Jita, Giri, Sushil Kumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cancer Intelligence 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10129396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37113727
http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2023.1519
_version_ 1785030726061654016
author Kulkarni, Rohini Vinayak
Mohapatra, Manoranjan
Nayak, Bhagyalaxmi
Samantaray, Sagarika
Mohapatra, Janmejaya
Parija, Jita
Giri, Sushil Kumar
author_facet Kulkarni, Rohini Vinayak
Mohapatra, Manoranjan
Nayak, Bhagyalaxmi
Samantaray, Sagarika
Mohapatra, Janmejaya
Parija, Jita
Giri, Sushil Kumar
author_sort Kulkarni, Rohini Vinayak
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Omentectomy is an essential part of cytoreductive surgery (CRS). However, removal of perigastric arcade (PGA) of the omentum is a controversial aspect of omentectomy in view of the fear of injury, vascular compromise and gastroparesis. Hence, we conducted a study to evaluate the necessity and effect of removal of PGA during omentectomy. METHODS: The nature of the study was a prospective observational study. The study period was for 1 year between 1.3.2019 and 29.2.2020. Patients with stage III to IV serous epithelial ovarian cancers – chemo naive/post neoadjuvant chemotherapy, without macroscopic involvement of the PGA were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups – those who had PGA removed (group 1) and those whose PGA was preserved (group 2). Pre, intra and postoperative factors between the two groups were compared using standard statistical methods. RESULTS: Micrometastasis to PGA was present in 36.4% of the patients in group 1. The predictors for this involvement included gross involvement and microscopic involvement of the mobile part of the omentum (p < 0.001), pre surgery Meyer’s score (p < 0.05) and requirement of peritonectomy (p < 0.05) during the CRS implying that higher the peritoneal carcinomatosis, more are the chances of microscopic involvement of PGA. On comparing postoperative outcomes between the two groups, we noted a statistically significant difference in intra-operative time (p < 0.01), prolonged recovery time with increased intensive care unit and hospital stay (p < 0.001) in group 1, although all with small absolute difference. However, there was no significant difference in major post-operative complications or time taken to tolerate soft diet. CONCLUSION: Micrometastasis to PGA was noted in significant number of cases. Its removal is also a safe procedure with minimal morbidity and good postoperative outcomes especially in cases with significant peritoneal carcinomatosis. Hence, it should be considered, provided we are achieving a complete cytoreduction otherwise.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10129396
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cancer Intelligence
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101293962023-04-26 Role of perigastric arcade removal in serous epithelial ovarian cancers Kulkarni, Rohini Vinayak Mohapatra, Manoranjan Nayak, Bhagyalaxmi Samantaray, Sagarika Mohapatra, Janmejaya Parija, Jita Giri, Sushil Kumar Ecancermedicalscience Research INTRODUCTION: Omentectomy is an essential part of cytoreductive surgery (CRS). However, removal of perigastric arcade (PGA) of the omentum is a controversial aspect of omentectomy in view of the fear of injury, vascular compromise and gastroparesis. Hence, we conducted a study to evaluate the necessity and effect of removal of PGA during omentectomy. METHODS: The nature of the study was a prospective observational study. The study period was for 1 year between 1.3.2019 and 29.2.2020. Patients with stage III to IV serous epithelial ovarian cancers – chemo naive/post neoadjuvant chemotherapy, without macroscopic involvement of the PGA were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups – those who had PGA removed (group 1) and those whose PGA was preserved (group 2). Pre, intra and postoperative factors between the two groups were compared using standard statistical methods. RESULTS: Micrometastasis to PGA was present in 36.4% of the patients in group 1. The predictors for this involvement included gross involvement and microscopic involvement of the mobile part of the omentum (p < 0.001), pre surgery Meyer’s score (p < 0.05) and requirement of peritonectomy (p < 0.05) during the CRS implying that higher the peritoneal carcinomatosis, more are the chances of microscopic involvement of PGA. On comparing postoperative outcomes between the two groups, we noted a statistically significant difference in intra-operative time (p < 0.01), prolonged recovery time with increased intensive care unit and hospital stay (p < 0.001) in group 1, although all with small absolute difference. However, there was no significant difference in major post-operative complications or time taken to tolerate soft diet. CONCLUSION: Micrometastasis to PGA was noted in significant number of cases. Its removal is also a safe procedure with minimal morbidity and good postoperative outcomes especially in cases with significant peritoneal carcinomatosis. Hence, it should be considered, provided we are achieving a complete cytoreduction otherwise. Cancer Intelligence 2023-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10129396/ /pubmed/37113727 http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2023.1519 Text en © the authors; licensee ecancermedicalscience. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Kulkarni, Rohini Vinayak
Mohapatra, Manoranjan
Nayak, Bhagyalaxmi
Samantaray, Sagarika
Mohapatra, Janmejaya
Parija, Jita
Giri, Sushil Kumar
Role of perigastric arcade removal in serous epithelial ovarian cancers
title Role of perigastric arcade removal in serous epithelial ovarian cancers
title_full Role of perigastric arcade removal in serous epithelial ovarian cancers
title_fullStr Role of perigastric arcade removal in serous epithelial ovarian cancers
title_full_unstemmed Role of perigastric arcade removal in serous epithelial ovarian cancers
title_short Role of perigastric arcade removal in serous epithelial ovarian cancers
title_sort role of perigastric arcade removal in serous epithelial ovarian cancers
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10129396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37113727
http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2023.1519
work_keys_str_mv AT kulkarnirohinivinayak roleofperigastricarcaderemovalinserousepithelialovariancancers
AT mohapatramanoranjan roleofperigastricarcaderemovalinserousepithelialovariancancers
AT nayakbhagyalaxmi roleofperigastricarcaderemovalinserousepithelialovariancancers
AT samantaraysagarika roleofperigastricarcaderemovalinserousepithelialovariancancers
AT mohapatrajanmejaya roleofperigastricarcaderemovalinserousepithelialovariancancers
AT parijajita roleofperigastricarcaderemovalinserousepithelialovariancancers
AT girisushilkumar roleofperigastricarcaderemovalinserousepithelialovariancancers