Cargando…

84 A follow-up evaluation of an expanded good clinical practice online training course: The relevance of community engagement to health research study teams.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: This study evaluates the impact of an updated and expanded training for social and behavioral health researchers. Participants’ experience with training modules focused on community engagement is a focus of this evaluation as is the application of this training by participants in t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Samuels, Elias, Champagne, Ellen, Lyden, Angela, Janevic, Mary, Culp, Michelle, Riddle, Melissa, Jay, Gina, Murphy, Susan L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10129447/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.168
_version_ 1785030739547389952
author Samuels, Elias
Champagne, Ellen
Lyden, Angela
Janevic, Mary
Culp, Michelle
Riddle, Melissa
Jay, Gina
Murphy, Susan L.
author_facet Samuels, Elias
Champagne, Ellen
Lyden, Angela
Janevic, Mary
Culp, Michelle
Riddle, Melissa
Jay, Gina
Murphy, Susan L.
author_sort Samuels, Elias
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES/GOALS: This study evaluates the impact of an updated and expanded training for social and behavioral health researchers. Participants’ experience with training modules focused on community engagement is a focus of this evaluation as is the application of this training by participants in teams. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: The Social and Behavioral Research training series for health researchers and team members was first created by faculty and staff of the Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research in 2018. This training was updated and expanded in 2021 with support from the National Institutes of Health to include new material regarding community-engaged health research as well as updates concerning technology and new federal regulations. Past participants of the training were invited to retake the training, as were clinical and translational researchers at University of Michigan who were new to the training. Surveys were sent to all participants after completing the training and a focus group of research staff was conducted to identify how they utilized the training in support of their teams. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: It is anticipated that at least 100 individuals will participate in the evaluation of the Social and Behavioral Research training between October 2022 and February 2023. Data extracted from U-M’s learning management platform will demonstrate how well participants performed on key knowledge checks embedded in the modules and how quickly they progressed through the sections of the training. These results will be compared to benchmarks derived from evaluations of the prior course which were conducted in 2018. A focus group of at least 10 individuals will demonstrate how health research staff utilized the training and associated resources to advance the scientific work of their study teams. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Comprehensive training programs for research best practices in social and behavioral health need to have tailored and up-to-date information for this group of researchers and staff. The results of this evaluation will demonstrate how this program contributed to the professional development of the health research workforce.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10129447
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101294472023-04-26 84 A follow-up evaluation of an expanded good clinical practice online training course: The relevance of community engagement to health research study teams. Samuels, Elias Champagne, Ellen Lyden, Angela Janevic, Mary Culp, Michelle Riddle, Melissa Jay, Gina Murphy, Susan L. J Clin Transl Sci Education, Career Development and Workforce Development OBJECTIVES/GOALS: This study evaluates the impact of an updated and expanded training for social and behavioral health researchers. Participants’ experience with training modules focused on community engagement is a focus of this evaluation as is the application of this training by participants in teams. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: The Social and Behavioral Research training series for health researchers and team members was first created by faculty and staff of the Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research in 2018. This training was updated and expanded in 2021 with support from the National Institutes of Health to include new material regarding community-engaged health research as well as updates concerning technology and new federal regulations. Past participants of the training were invited to retake the training, as were clinical and translational researchers at University of Michigan who were new to the training. Surveys were sent to all participants after completing the training and a focus group of research staff was conducted to identify how they utilized the training in support of their teams. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: It is anticipated that at least 100 individuals will participate in the evaluation of the Social and Behavioral Research training between October 2022 and February 2023. Data extracted from U-M’s learning management platform will demonstrate how well participants performed on key knowledge checks embedded in the modules and how quickly they progressed through the sections of the training. These results will be compared to benchmarks derived from evaluations of the prior course which were conducted in 2018. A focus group of at least 10 individuals will demonstrate how health research staff utilized the training and associated resources to advance the scientific work of their study teams. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Comprehensive training programs for research best practices in social and behavioral health need to have tailored and up-to-date information for this group of researchers and staff. The results of this evaluation will demonstrate how this program contributed to the professional development of the health research workforce. Cambridge University Press 2023-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10129447/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.168 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
spellingShingle Education, Career Development and Workforce Development
Samuels, Elias
Champagne, Ellen
Lyden, Angela
Janevic, Mary
Culp, Michelle
Riddle, Melissa
Jay, Gina
Murphy, Susan L.
84 A follow-up evaluation of an expanded good clinical practice online training course: The relevance of community engagement to health research study teams.
title 84 A follow-up evaluation of an expanded good clinical practice online training course: The relevance of community engagement to health research study teams.
title_full 84 A follow-up evaluation of an expanded good clinical practice online training course: The relevance of community engagement to health research study teams.
title_fullStr 84 A follow-up evaluation of an expanded good clinical practice online training course: The relevance of community engagement to health research study teams.
title_full_unstemmed 84 A follow-up evaluation of an expanded good clinical practice online training course: The relevance of community engagement to health research study teams.
title_short 84 A follow-up evaluation of an expanded good clinical practice online training course: The relevance of community engagement to health research study teams.
title_sort 84 a follow-up evaluation of an expanded good clinical practice online training course: the relevance of community engagement to health research study teams.
topic Education, Career Development and Workforce Development
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10129447/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.168
work_keys_str_mv AT samuelselias 84afollowupevaluationofanexpandedgoodclinicalpracticeonlinetrainingcoursetherelevanceofcommunityengagementtohealthresearchstudyteams
AT champagneellen 84afollowupevaluationofanexpandedgoodclinicalpracticeonlinetrainingcoursetherelevanceofcommunityengagementtohealthresearchstudyteams
AT lydenangela 84afollowupevaluationofanexpandedgoodclinicalpracticeonlinetrainingcoursetherelevanceofcommunityengagementtohealthresearchstudyteams
AT janevicmary 84afollowupevaluationofanexpandedgoodclinicalpracticeonlinetrainingcoursetherelevanceofcommunityengagementtohealthresearchstudyteams
AT culpmichelle 84afollowupevaluationofanexpandedgoodclinicalpracticeonlinetrainingcoursetherelevanceofcommunityengagementtohealthresearchstudyteams
AT riddlemelissa 84afollowupevaluationofanexpandedgoodclinicalpracticeonlinetrainingcoursetherelevanceofcommunityengagementtohealthresearchstudyteams
AT jaygina 84afollowupevaluationofanexpandedgoodclinicalpracticeonlinetrainingcoursetherelevanceofcommunityengagementtohealthresearchstudyteams
AT murphysusanl 84afollowupevaluationofanexpandedgoodclinicalpracticeonlinetrainingcoursetherelevanceofcommunityengagementtohealthresearchstudyteams