Cargando…

390 A Mixed Methods Review of Endpoint Measures Utilized in Adult ADHD Medication Clinical Trial Design

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: To evaluate the clinical trial designs of stimulant medications approved for the treatment of adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and identify discrepancies between safety and efficacy outcome measure criteria. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: There are 24 stimulants cur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Davies, Claire, Church, Terry David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10129487/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.425
_version_ 1785030749650419712
author Davies, Claire
Church, Terry David
author_facet Davies, Claire
Church, Terry David
author_sort Davies, Claire
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES/GOALS: To evaluate the clinical trial designs of stimulant medications approved for the treatment of adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and identify discrepancies between safety and efficacy outcome measure criteria. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: There are 24 stimulants currently approved and marketed for the treatment of adult ADHD: 12 amphetamine (AMP)-based and 12 methylphenidate (MPH)-based formulations. A mixed methods review of clinical trials that have evaluated the safety and efficacy of these drugs will be performed using qualitative and quantitative data, including inclusion and exclusion criteria, primary and secondary outcome measures, manufacturer recommendations, and package inserts, as well as FDA recommendations for industry. After compiling a list of clinical trials for each of the 24 drugs, this information will be analyzed for themes and trends in the assessment of safety and efficacy with particular attention paid to differing criteria between individual drugs and/or the two subclasses of prescription stimulants. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The FDA has published recommendations for ADHD medication clinical trial design, including suggested outcome measures utilizing validated assessment tools. However, the FDA notes that these assessments may be altered to fit study populations and indicate that other primary and secondary endpoint measures may be acceptable. As such, efficacy assessments for these drugs may vary greatly, and the specific criterion selected for each drug’s study population and outcome measures may suggest more specific indications and usage conditions for optimal efficacy. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Regulatory officials consider AMP- and MPH-based stimulants equivalent therapeutic options for the treatment of ADHD. A study of clinical trial criteria reveals that differing mechanisms have been used to evaluate safety and efficacy. This discrepancy may have implications that affect clinical decision-making and patient experiences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10129487
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101294872023-04-26 390 A Mixed Methods Review of Endpoint Measures Utilized in Adult ADHD Medication Clinical Trial Design Davies, Claire Church, Terry David J Clin Transl Sci Regulatory Science OBJECTIVES/GOALS: To evaluate the clinical trial designs of stimulant medications approved for the treatment of adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and identify discrepancies between safety and efficacy outcome measure criteria. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: There are 24 stimulants currently approved and marketed for the treatment of adult ADHD: 12 amphetamine (AMP)-based and 12 methylphenidate (MPH)-based formulations. A mixed methods review of clinical trials that have evaluated the safety and efficacy of these drugs will be performed using qualitative and quantitative data, including inclusion and exclusion criteria, primary and secondary outcome measures, manufacturer recommendations, and package inserts, as well as FDA recommendations for industry. After compiling a list of clinical trials for each of the 24 drugs, this information will be analyzed for themes and trends in the assessment of safety and efficacy with particular attention paid to differing criteria between individual drugs and/or the two subclasses of prescription stimulants. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The FDA has published recommendations for ADHD medication clinical trial design, including suggested outcome measures utilizing validated assessment tools. However, the FDA notes that these assessments may be altered to fit study populations and indicate that other primary and secondary endpoint measures may be acceptable. As such, efficacy assessments for these drugs may vary greatly, and the specific criterion selected for each drug’s study population and outcome measures may suggest more specific indications and usage conditions for optimal efficacy. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Regulatory officials consider AMP- and MPH-based stimulants equivalent therapeutic options for the treatment of ADHD. A study of clinical trial criteria reveals that differing mechanisms have been used to evaluate safety and efficacy. This discrepancy may have implications that affect clinical decision-making and patient experiences. Cambridge University Press 2023-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10129487/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.425 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
spellingShingle Regulatory Science
Davies, Claire
Church, Terry David
390 A Mixed Methods Review of Endpoint Measures Utilized in Adult ADHD Medication Clinical Trial Design
title 390 A Mixed Methods Review of Endpoint Measures Utilized in Adult ADHD Medication Clinical Trial Design
title_full 390 A Mixed Methods Review of Endpoint Measures Utilized in Adult ADHD Medication Clinical Trial Design
title_fullStr 390 A Mixed Methods Review of Endpoint Measures Utilized in Adult ADHD Medication Clinical Trial Design
title_full_unstemmed 390 A Mixed Methods Review of Endpoint Measures Utilized in Adult ADHD Medication Clinical Trial Design
title_short 390 A Mixed Methods Review of Endpoint Measures Utilized in Adult ADHD Medication Clinical Trial Design
title_sort 390 a mixed methods review of endpoint measures utilized in adult adhd medication clinical trial design
topic Regulatory Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10129487/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.425
work_keys_str_mv AT daviesclaire 390amixedmethodsreviewofendpointmeasuresutilizedinadultadhdmedicationclinicaltrialdesign
AT churchterrydavid 390amixedmethodsreviewofendpointmeasuresutilizedinadultadhdmedicationclinicaltrialdesign