Cargando…

426 Datathon Revisited: Implementation of Lesson Learned

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: In 2020, Baylor College of Medicine held a datathon to introduce a data warehouse, identify its capabilities/limitations, foster collaborations, and engage trainees. The event was held again in 2022, and lessons learned (e.g., tools for data self-service or team communication) were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zimolzak, Andrew J., Sippel, Katherine, Davila, Jessica A., DeBakey, Michael E., Punugoti, Vamshi, Klotman, Paul E., Petersen, Laura A., Liao, Gloria, Leiber, Lee, Amos, Christopher I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10129517/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.458
_version_ 1785030759341359104
author Zimolzak, Andrew J.
Sippel, Katherine
Davila, Jessica A.
DeBakey, Michael E.
Punugoti, Vamshi
Klotman, Paul E.
Petersen, Laura A.
DeBakey, Michael E.
Liao, Gloria
Leiber, Lee
Amos, Christopher I.
author_facet Zimolzak, Andrew J.
Sippel, Katherine
Davila, Jessica A.
DeBakey, Michael E.
Punugoti, Vamshi
Klotman, Paul E.
Petersen, Laura A.
DeBakey, Michael E.
Liao, Gloria
Leiber, Lee
Amos, Christopher I.
author_sort Zimolzak, Andrew J.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES/GOALS: In 2020, Baylor College of Medicine held a datathon to introduce a data warehouse, identify its capabilities/limitations, foster collaborations, and engage trainees. The event was held again in 2022, and lessons learned (e.g., tools for data self-service or team communication) were applied. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Senior faculty reviewed proposals with an emphasis on feasibility, impact, and relevance to quality improvement or population health. Selected teams worked with Information Technology (IT) for 2 months and presented findings at a 1-day event. Surveys were administered to participants before and after the event to evaluate their background, team characteristics, collaborations, knowledge before and after the datathon, perceived value of the datathon, and plans for future work. Descriptive statistics of respondents’ self-reports were tabulated. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: In 2022, 19 of 36 projects were accepted (13/33 in 2020). At both events, most projects studied quality improvement or clinical outcomes. Of 82 participants in 2022, 54 completed surveys. In 2022, 72% had no datathon experience (48% in 2020). Median effort was 10 person-hours; median IT time was 20% (20 and 10%, in 2020). Seven respondents finished and 21 partially finished their projects (1 and 11, in 2020); 92% made new collaborations (91% in 2020). Respondents strongly agreed that: the experience was valuable (n=28), they would participate in future datathons (n=30), and they would use the warehouse for future work (n=25). Twenty-seven have planned abstracts; 25 have planned manuscripts. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The 2022 datathon had more participants with less experience, potentially due to improved promotion and training opportunities. Fewer person-hours and a higher percentage of IT time were required as compared to 2020, and more projects were completed, possibly due to increased IT efficiency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10129517
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101295172023-04-26 426 Datathon Revisited: Implementation of Lesson Learned Zimolzak, Andrew J. Sippel, Katherine Davila, Jessica A. DeBakey, Michael E. Punugoti, Vamshi Klotman, Paul E. Petersen, Laura A. DeBakey, Michael E. Liao, Gloria Leiber, Lee Amos, Christopher I. J Clin Transl Sci Team Science OBJECTIVES/GOALS: In 2020, Baylor College of Medicine held a datathon to introduce a data warehouse, identify its capabilities/limitations, foster collaborations, and engage trainees. The event was held again in 2022, and lessons learned (e.g., tools for data self-service or team communication) were applied. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Senior faculty reviewed proposals with an emphasis on feasibility, impact, and relevance to quality improvement or population health. Selected teams worked with Information Technology (IT) for 2 months and presented findings at a 1-day event. Surveys were administered to participants before and after the event to evaluate their background, team characteristics, collaborations, knowledge before and after the datathon, perceived value of the datathon, and plans for future work. Descriptive statistics of respondents’ self-reports were tabulated. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: In 2022, 19 of 36 projects were accepted (13/33 in 2020). At both events, most projects studied quality improvement or clinical outcomes. Of 82 participants in 2022, 54 completed surveys. In 2022, 72% had no datathon experience (48% in 2020). Median effort was 10 person-hours; median IT time was 20% (20 and 10%, in 2020). Seven respondents finished and 21 partially finished their projects (1 and 11, in 2020); 92% made new collaborations (91% in 2020). Respondents strongly agreed that: the experience was valuable (n=28), they would participate in future datathons (n=30), and they would use the warehouse for future work (n=25). Twenty-seven have planned abstracts; 25 have planned manuscripts. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The 2022 datathon had more participants with less experience, potentially due to improved promotion and training opportunities. Fewer person-hours and a higher percentage of IT time were required as compared to 2020, and more projects were completed, possibly due to increased IT efficiency. Cambridge University Press 2023-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10129517/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.458 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
spellingShingle Team Science
Zimolzak, Andrew J.
Sippel, Katherine
Davila, Jessica A.
DeBakey, Michael E.
Punugoti, Vamshi
Klotman, Paul E.
Petersen, Laura A.
DeBakey, Michael E.
Liao, Gloria
Leiber, Lee
Amos, Christopher I.
426 Datathon Revisited: Implementation of Lesson Learned
title 426 Datathon Revisited: Implementation of Lesson Learned
title_full 426 Datathon Revisited: Implementation of Lesson Learned
title_fullStr 426 Datathon Revisited: Implementation of Lesson Learned
title_full_unstemmed 426 Datathon Revisited: Implementation of Lesson Learned
title_short 426 Datathon Revisited: Implementation of Lesson Learned
title_sort 426 datathon revisited: implementation of lesson learned
topic Team Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10129517/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.458
work_keys_str_mv AT zimolzakandrewj 426datathonrevisitedimplementationoflessonlearned
AT sippelkatherine 426datathonrevisitedimplementationoflessonlearned
AT davilajessicaa 426datathonrevisitedimplementationoflessonlearned
AT debakeymichaele 426datathonrevisitedimplementationoflessonlearned
AT punugotivamshi 426datathonrevisitedimplementationoflessonlearned
AT klotmanpaule 426datathonrevisitedimplementationoflessonlearned
AT petersenlauraa 426datathonrevisitedimplementationoflessonlearned
AT debakeymichaele 426datathonrevisitedimplementationoflessonlearned
AT liaogloria 426datathonrevisitedimplementationoflessonlearned
AT leiberlee 426datathonrevisitedimplementationoflessonlearned
AT amoschristopheri 426datathonrevisitedimplementationoflessonlearned