Cargando…

213 Provider-identified barriers to recommending low-intensity treatments for patients awaiting mental health care

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Waiting for psychotherapy is a major barrier to care and associated with negative outcomes. Individuals waiting for treatment may be particularly well-suited to receive low-intensity treatments (LITs), but few providers recommend LITs. We investigated provider-identified barriers t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peipert, Allison, Adams, Sydney, Lorenzo-Luaces, Lorenzo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10129520/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.285
_version_ 1785030760065925120
author Peipert, Allison
Adams, Sydney
Lorenzo-Luaces, Lorenzo
author_facet Peipert, Allison
Adams, Sydney
Lorenzo-Luaces, Lorenzo
author_sort Peipert, Allison
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Waiting for psychotherapy is a major barrier to care and associated with negative outcomes. Individuals waiting for treatment may be particularly well-suited to receive low-intensity treatments (LITs), but few providers recommend LITs. We investigated provider-identified barriers to recommending LITs for patients on treatment waiting lists. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We recruited mental health professionals via social media and professional association listservs to participate in a brief survey. Participants were asked about their current waiting list practices and attitudes towards low-intensity resources for patients waiting for treatment. Participants were prompted to provide additional thoughts on recommending LITs for patients on waiting lists in an open-ended text box. Two members of the research team independently coded responses into themes, resolved discrepancies, and achieved total consensus. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: 141 mental health providers participated in the survey, and 65 (46%) provided a response to the open-ended question. The emerging themes included: Patient Barriers, Research Evidence/Efficacy, Feasibility, Patient Personal Contact, Patient Appropriateness, Liability, Systemic Problems, Trust in Programs, Downplaying Distress, Additional Resources, and Positive Attitudes. Providers were particularly concerned with giving a generalized intervention without having conducted a full evaluation or assessment with a patient. Many providers also reported concerns pertaining to the legal and ethical liability of providing LITs when a patient is not being seen face-to-face by a provider. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Many of the themes we identified parallel those identified in previous literature. Some barriers we identified from our providers, when thinking about integrating LITs on waiting lists, highlight the need for professional guidelines to address legal and ethical liability, as well as billing and reimbursement procedures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10129520
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101295202023-04-26 213 Provider-identified barriers to recommending low-intensity treatments for patients awaiting mental health care Peipert, Allison Adams, Sydney Lorenzo-Luaces, Lorenzo J Clin Transl Sci Health Equity and Community Engagement OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Waiting for psychotherapy is a major barrier to care and associated with negative outcomes. Individuals waiting for treatment may be particularly well-suited to receive low-intensity treatments (LITs), but few providers recommend LITs. We investigated provider-identified barriers to recommending LITs for patients on treatment waiting lists. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We recruited mental health professionals via social media and professional association listservs to participate in a brief survey. Participants were asked about their current waiting list practices and attitudes towards low-intensity resources for patients waiting for treatment. Participants were prompted to provide additional thoughts on recommending LITs for patients on waiting lists in an open-ended text box. Two members of the research team independently coded responses into themes, resolved discrepancies, and achieved total consensus. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: 141 mental health providers participated in the survey, and 65 (46%) provided a response to the open-ended question. The emerging themes included: Patient Barriers, Research Evidence/Efficacy, Feasibility, Patient Personal Contact, Patient Appropriateness, Liability, Systemic Problems, Trust in Programs, Downplaying Distress, Additional Resources, and Positive Attitudes. Providers were particularly concerned with giving a generalized intervention without having conducted a full evaluation or assessment with a patient. Many providers also reported concerns pertaining to the legal and ethical liability of providing LITs when a patient is not being seen face-to-face by a provider. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Many of the themes we identified parallel those identified in previous literature. Some barriers we identified from our providers, when thinking about integrating LITs on waiting lists, highlight the need for professional guidelines to address legal and ethical liability, as well as billing and reimbursement procedures. Cambridge University Press 2023-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10129520/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.285 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
spellingShingle Health Equity and Community Engagement
Peipert, Allison
Adams, Sydney
Lorenzo-Luaces, Lorenzo
213 Provider-identified barriers to recommending low-intensity treatments for patients awaiting mental health care
title 213 Provider-identified barriers to recommending low-intensity treatments for patients awaiting mental health care
title_full 213 Provider-identified barriers to recommending low-intensity treatments for patients awaiting mental health care
title_fullStr 213 Provider-identified barriers to recommending low-intensity treatments for patients awaiting mental health care
title_full_unstemmed 213 Provider-identified barriers to recommending low-intensity treatments for patients awaiting mental health care
title_short 213 Provider-identified barriers to recommending low-intensity treatments for patients awaiting mental health care
title_sort 213 provider-identified barriers to recommending low-intensity treatments for patients awaiting mental health care
topic Health Equity and Community Engagement
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10129520/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.285
work_keys_str_mv AT peipertallison 213provideridentifiedbarrierstorecommendinglowintensitytreatmentsforpatientsawaitingmentalhealthcare
AT adamssydney 213provideridentifiedbarrierstorecommendinglowintensitytreatmentsforpatientsawaitingmentalhealthcare
AT lorenzoluaceslorenzo 213provideridentifiedbarrierstorecommendinglowintensitytreatmentsforpatientsawaitingmentalhealthcare