491 Outcomes of an Integrated Research Ethics Consultation Service

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The need for mechanisms of ethical discourse and guidance has increased as translational research collaborations become more complex. The goal of this project is to analyze the stakeholder engagement and ethical issues our research ethics consultation service (RECS) conducted over a two year period. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We conducted a retrospective review of our RECS database from 2020 to 2022. We examined the nature of the research and ethical issues of concern from consult requestors, including whether or not consults were preventative. In addition, we assessed the educational outreach conducted during that timeframe as a measure of service awareness. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: There was a total of 42 consults conducted over the previous year. There were a wide variety of issues related to informed IRB-related processes (31%), consent (24%), QA/QI determination (12%), authorship (10%), confidentiality (7%), diversity/inclusion (7%), grant preparation (7%). Many of the consults (n=28, 67%) included secondary issues. A few consults (n=4, 10%) were preventative, meaning that the consult was requested in anticipation or consideration of a potential ethical issue. Outreach efforts extended to a diverse array of institutional stakeholders and trainees. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The RECS serves numerous constituencies throughout our institution on ethical issues spanning nearly all aspects of research design, conduct, and analysis. These data highlight initiatives to increase study efficiency (in collaboration with institutional research oversight) and helps to direct educational efforts and outreach.