Cargando…
251 A Mixed Methods Study of Patient and Clinician Views and Experiences of Pharmacogenomic Testing for Major Depressive Disorder
OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Pharmacogenomic testing for major depressive disorder is an expanding area of precision medicine with multiple direct-to-provider tests available. While clinical evidence supporting testing is expanding, there has been little research on the views and experiences of patients and cl...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10129575/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.318 |
_version_ | 1785030775213654016 |
---|---|
author | Hendy, Katherine Ellingrod, Vicki Roberts, Scott |
author_facet | Hendy, Katherine Ellingrod, Vicki Roberts, Scott |
author_sort | Hendy, Katherine |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Pharmacogenomic testing for major depressive disorder is an expanding area of precision medicine with multiple direct-to-provider tests available. While clinical evidence supporting testing is expanding, there has been little research on the views and experiences of patients and clinicians utilizing this novel intervention. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: This ongoing study is conducting semi-structured interviews with clinicians and patients exploring their views of the benefits and limitations of pharmacogenomic testing. Qualitative interviews have been conducted with 10 patients and 10 clinicians who have experience with ordering or receiving results within the past 12 months. Interviews are being thematically coded following a modified grounded theory approach using the Dedoose software. Following the principles of exploratory sequential mixed methods design, findings will be used to develop a survey to be administered to prescribing clinicians in both primary care and psychiatry. The survey will examine clinician's knowledge, interest, and concerns about utilizing testing. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Preliminary analysis of qualitative interviews indicates that both patients and clinicians find that the broader testing process has benefits beyond the test results themselves. Benefits identified by patients include an increased trust in the process of selecting medications, validation of their negative experiences with medications, and improved communication with their provider. Limitations identified by patients include difficulty in accessing test results, and gatekeeping for testing by providers. Benefits identified by clinicians include increased empathy with patients, medication adherence, and improved communication with patients about medication. Limitations identified by clinicians include difficulty with ordering and interpreting test results. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Medication selection is a difficult process for both patients and clinicians. Improvements to clinician-patient communication and medication adherence are important benefits to consider in the adoption of testing. Future research should include these dimensions in assessment of the benefits and limitations of testing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10129575 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101295752023-04-26 251 A Mixed Methods Study of Patient and Clinician Views and Experiences of Pharmacogenomic Testing for Major Depressive Disorder Hendy, Katherine Ellingrod, Vicki Roberts, Scott J Clin Transl Sci Precision Medicine/Health OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Pharmacogenomic testing for major depressive disorder is an expanding area of precision medicine with multiple direct-to-provider tests available. While clinical evidence supporting testing is expanding, there has been little research on the views and experiences of patients and clinicians utilizing this novel intervention. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: This ongoing study is conducting semi-structured interviews with clinicians and patients exploring their views of the benefits and limitations of pharmacogenomic testing. Qualitative interviews have been conducted with 10 patients and 10 clinicians who have experience with ordering or receiving results within the past 12 months. Interviews are being thematically coded following a modified grounded theory approach using the Dedoose software. Following the principles of exploratory sequential mixed methods design, findings will be used to develop a survey to be administered to prescribing clinicians in both primary care and psychiatry. The survey will examine clinician's knowledge, interest, and concerns about utilizing testing. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Preliminary analysis of qualitative interviews indicates that both patients and clinicians find that the broader testing process has benefits beyond the test results themselves. Benefits identified by patients include an increased trust in the process of selecting medications, validation of their negative experiences with medications, and improved communication with their provider. Limitations identified by patients include difficulty in accessing test results, and gatekeeping for testing by providers. Benefits identified by clinicians include increased empathy with patients, medication adherence, and improved communication with patients about medication. Limitations identified by clinicians include difficulty with ordering and interpreting test results. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Medication selection is a difficult process for both patients and clinicians. Improvements to clinician-patient communication and medication adherence are important benefits to consider in the adoption of testing. Future research should include these dimensions in assessment of the benefits and limitations of testing. Cambridge University Press 2023-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10129575/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.318 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work. |
spellingShingle | Precision Medicine/Health Hendy, Katherine Ellingrod, Vicki Roberts, Scott 251 A Mixed Methods Study of Patient and Clinician Views and Experiences of Pharmacogenomic Testing for Major Depressive Disorder |
title | 251 A Mixed Methods Study of Patient and Clinician Views and Experiences of Pharmacogenomic Testing for Major Depressive Disorder |
title_full | 251 A Mixed Methods Study of Patient and Clinician Views and Experiences of Pharmacogenomic Testing for Major Depressive Disorder |
title_fullStr | 251 A Mixed Methods Study of Patient and Clinician Views and Experiences of Pharmacogenomic Testing for Major Depressive Disorder |
title_full_unstemmed | 251 A Mixed Methods Study of Patient and Clinician Views and Experiences of Pharmacogenomic Testing for Major Depressive Disorder |
title_short | 251 A Mixed Methods Study of Patient and Clinician Views and Experiences of Pharmacogenomic Testing for Major Depressive Disorder |
title_sort | 251 a mixed methods study of patient and clinician views and experiences of pharmacogenomic testing for major depressive disorder |
topic | Precision Medicine/Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10129575/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.318 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hendykatherine 251amixedmethodsstudyofpatientandclinicianviewsandexperiencesofpharmacogenomictestingformajordepressivedisorder AT ellingrodvicki 251amixedmethodsstudyofpatientandclinicianviewsandexperiencesofpharmacogenomictestingformajordepressivedisorder AT robertsscott 251amixedmethodsstudyofpatientandclinicianviewsandexperiencesofpharmacogenomictestingformajordepressivedisorder |