Cargando…

251 A Mixed Methods Study of Patient and Clinician Views and Experiences of Pharmacogenomic Testing for Major Depressive Disorder

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Pharmacogenomic testing for major depressive disorder is an expanding area of precision medicine with multiple direct-to-provider tests available. While clinical evidence supporting testing is expanding, there has been little research on the views and experiences of patients and cl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hendy, Katherine, Ellingrod, Vicki, Roberts, Scott
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10129575/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.318
_version_ 1785030775213654016
author Hendy, Katherine
Ellingrod, Vicki
Roberts, Scott
author_facet Hendy, Katherine
Ellingrod, Vicki
Roberts, Scott
author_sort Hendy, Katherine
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Pharmacogenomic testing for major depressive disorder is an expanding area of precision medicine with multiple direct-to-provider tests available. While clinical evidence supporting testing is expanding, there has been little research on the views and experiences of patients and clinicians utilizing this novel intervention. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: This ongoing study is conducting semi-structured interviews with clinicians and patients exploring their views of the benefits and limitations of pharmacogenomic testing. Qualitative interviews have been conducted with 10 patients and 10 clinicians who have experience with ordering or receiving results within the past 12 months. Interviews are being thematically coded following a modified grounded theory approach using the Dedoose software. Following the principles of exploratory sequential mixed methods design, findings will be used to develop a survey to be administered to prescribing clinicians in both primary care and psychiatry. The survey will examine clinician's knowledge, interest, and concerns about utilizing testing. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Preliminary analysis of qualitative interviews indicates that both patients and clinicians find that the broader testing process has benefits beyond the test results themselves. Benefits identified by patients include an increased trust in the process of selecting medications, validation of their negative experiences with medications, and improved communication with their provider. Limitations identified by patients include difficulty in accessing test results, and gatekeeping for testing by providers. Benefits identified by clinicians include increased empathy with patients, medication adherence, and improved communication with patients about medication. Limitations identified by clinicians include difficulty with ordering and interpreting test results. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Medication selection is a difficult process for both patients and clinicians. Improvements to clinician-patient communication and medication adherence are important benefits to consider in the adoption of testing. Future research should include these dimensions in assessment of the benefits and limitations of testing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10129575
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101295752023-04-26 251 A Mixed Methods Study of Patient and Clinician Views and Experiences of Pharmacogenomic Testing for Major Depressive Disorder Hendy, Katherine Ellingrod, Vicki Roberts, Scott J Clin Transl Sci Precision Medicine/Health OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Pharmacogenomic testing for major depressive disorder is an expanding area of precision medicine with multiple direct-to-provider tests available. While clinical evidence supporting testing is expanding, there has been little research on the views and experiences of patients and clinicians utilizing this novel intervention. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: This ongoing study is conducting semi-structured interviews with clinicians and patients exploring their views of the benefits and limitations of pharmacogenomic testing. Qualitative interviews have been conducted with 10 patients and 10 clinicians who have experience with ordering or receiving results within the past 12 months. Interviews are being thematically coded following a modified grounded theory approach using the Dedoose software. Following the principles of exploratory sequential mixed methods design, findings will be used to develop a survey to be administered to prescribing clinicians in both primary care and psychiatry. The survey will examine clinician's knowledge, interest, and concerns about utilizing testing. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Preliminary analysis of qualitative interviews indicates that both patients and clinicians find that the broader testing process has benefits beyond the test results themselves. Benefits identified by patients include an increased trust in the process of selecting medications, validation of their negative experiences with medications, and improved communication with their provider. Limitations identified by patients include difficulty in accessing test results, and gatekeeping for testing by providers. Benefits identified by clinicians include increased empathy with patients, medication adherence, and improved communication with patients about medication. Limitations identified by clinicians include difficulty with ordering and interpreting test results. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Medication selection is a difficult process for both patients and clinicians. Improvements to clinician-patient communication and medication adherence are important benefits to consider in the adoption of testing. Future research should include these dimensions in assessment of the benefits and limitations of testing. Cambridge University Press 2023-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10129575/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.318 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
spellingShingle Precision Medicine/Health
Hendy, Katherine
Ellingrod, Vicki
Roberts, Scott
251 A Mixed Methods Study of Patient and Clinician Views and Experiences of Pharmacogenomic Testing for Major Depressive Disorder
title 251 A Mixed Methods Study of Patient and Clinician Views and Experiences of Pharmacogenomic Testing for Major Depressive Disorder
title_full 251 A Mixed Methods Study of Patient and Clinician Views and Experiences of Pharmacogenomic Testing for Major Depressive Disorder
title_fullStr 251 A Mixed Methods Study of Patient and Clinician Views and Experiences of Pharmacogenomic Testing for Major Depressive Disorder
title_full_unstemmed 251 A Mixed Methods Study of Patient and Clinician Views and Experiences of Pharmacogenomic Testing for Major Depressive Disorder
title_short 251 A Mixed Methods Study of Patient and Clinician Views and Experiences of Pharmacogenomic Testing for Major Depressive Disorder
title_sort 251 a mixed methods study of patient and clinician views and experiences of pharmacogenomic testing for major depressive disorder
topic Precision Medicine/Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10129575/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.318
work_keys_str_mv AT hendykatherine 251amixedmethodsstudyofpatientandclinicianviewsandexperiencesofpharmacogenomictestingformajordepressivedisorder
AT ellingrodvicki 251amixedmethodsstudyofpatientandclinicianviewsandexperiencesofpharmacogenomictestingformajordepressivedisorder
AT robertsscott 251amixedmethodsstudyofpatientandclinicianviewsandexperiencesofpharmacogenomictestingformajordepressivedisorder