Cargando…
113 Shut Up & Write! to Build Writing Self-Efficacy and Self-Regulation in Early-Career Researchers
OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Writing self-efficacy & self-regulation are tied to publication & grant submission” writers high in these traits are more productive. We investigated if participating in Shut Up & Write! would produce statistically significant gains in self-efficacy & self-regulatio...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10129580/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.196 |
_version_ | 1785030776380719104 |
---|---|
author | Mayowski, Colleen A. Proulx, Chelsea N. Rubio, Doris M. |
author_facet | Mayowski, Colleen A. Proulx, Chelsea N. Rubio, Doris M. |
author_sort | Mayowski, Colleen A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Writing self-efficacy & self-regulation are tied to publication & grant submission” writers high in these traits are more productive. We investigated if participating in Shut Up & Write! would produce statistically significant gains in self-efficacy & self-regulation when comparing pre/post surveys. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: 47 US med students, TL1/KL2, & early-career faculty expressed interest in participating. We conducted a 12-week, 1 hr/week Shut Up & Write!-style (SUAW) activity, held on Zoom, and measured the effect using a pre-post survey adapted from the Writer Self-Perception Scale. Matched pairs t-tests (I(2)=0.05) to test for significant differences between pre- and post-test means were conducted on 3 subscales. The 3 subscales reflected writing attitudes (self-efficacy), writing strategies (self-regulation), and avoiding writing distractions (self-regulation). Subscales showed acceptable internal consistency with Cronbach’s alphas of 0.80, 0.71, and 0.72. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: 24/37 (65%) completed pre-post surveys. 81% presented as female. 60% were NIH-defined URB and/or were from MSIs. 60% previously participated in an activity similar to SUAW. Sum scale statistics for those who previously participated were significant for the self-efficacy subscale (p=0.020) and writing strategies subscale (p=0.041). Sum scale statistics for those who had not previously participated were significant for the writing strategies subscale (p=0.002). We saw no difference in the avoiding writing distractions subscale. 80% were very satisfied/satisfied with SUAW (I really loved these sessions” they helped me to identify a writing goal that could actually be accomplished in an hour.) DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: We found significant differences in self-efficacy & self-regulation, building upon findings from a 2021 pilot, and providing evidence that regular participation in an activity like SUAW produces increased self-efficacy and self-regulation and may increase manuscript and grant-writing productivity |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10129580 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101295802023-04-26 113 Shut Up & Write! to Build Writing Self-Efficacy and Self-Regulation in Early-Career Researchers Mayowski, Colleen A. Proulx, Chelsea N. Rubio, Doris M. J Clin Transl Sci Education, Career Development and Workforce Development OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Writing self-efficacy & self-regulation are tied to publication & grant submission” writers high in these traits are more productive. We investigated if participating in Shut Up & Write! would produce statistically significant gains in self-efficacy & self-regulation when comparing pre/post surveys. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: 47 US med students, TL1/KL2, & early-career faculty expressed interest in participating. We conducted a 12-week, 1 hr/week Shut Up & Write!-style (SUAW) activity, held on Zoom, and measured the effect using a pre-post survey adapted from the Writer Self-Perception Scale. Matched pairs t-tests (I(2)=0.05) to test for significant differences between pre- and post-test means were conducted on 3 subscales. The 3 subscales reflected writing attitudes (self-efficacy), writing strategies (self-regulation), and avoiding writing distractions (self-regulation). Subscales showed acceptable internal consistency with Cronbach’s alphas of 0.80, 0.71, and 0.72. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: 24/37 (65%) completed pre-post surveys. 81% presented as female. 60% were NIH-defined URB and/or were from MSIs. 60% previously participated in an activity similar to SUAW. Sum scale statistics for those who previously participated were significant for the self-efficacy subscale (p=0.020) and writing strategies subscale (p=0.041). Sum scale statistics for those who had not previously participated were significant for the writing strategies subscale (p=0.002). We saw no difference in the avoiding writing distractions subscale. 80% were very satisfied/satisfied with SUAW (I really loved these sessions” they helped me to identify a writing goal that could actually be accomplished in an hour.) DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: We found significant differences in self-efficacy & self-regulation, building upon findings from a 2021 pilot, and providing evidence that regular participation in an activity like SUAW produces increased self-efficacy and self-regulation and may increase manuscript and grant-writing productivity Cambridge University Press 2023-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10129580/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.196 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work. |
spellingShingle | Education, Career Development and Workforce Development Mayowski, Colleen A. Proulx, Chelsea N. Rubio, Doris M. 113 Shut Up & Write! to Build Writing Self-Efficacy and Self-Regulation in Early-Career Researchers |
title | 113 Shut Up & Write! to Build Writing Self-Efficacy and Self-Regulation in Early-Career Researchers |
title_full | 113 Shut Up & Write! to Build Writing Self-Efficacy and Self-Regulation in Early-Career Researchers |
title_fullStr | 113 Shut Up & Write! to Build Writing Self-Efficacy and Self-Regulation in Early-Career Researchers |
title_full_unstemmed | 113 Shut Up & Write! to Build Writing Self-Efficacy and Self-Regulation in Early-Career Researchers |
title_short | 113 Shut Up & Write! to Build Writing Self-Efficacy and Self-Regulation in Early-Career Researchers |
title_sort | 113 shut up & write! to build writing self-efficacy and self-regulation in early-career researchers |
topic | Education, Career Development and Workforce Development |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10129580/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.196 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mayowskicolleena 113shutupwritetobuildwritingselfefficacyandselfregulationinearlycareerresearchers AT proulxchelsean 113shutupwritetobuildwritingselfefficacyandselfregulationinearlycareerresearchers AT rubiodorism 113shutupwritetobuildwritingselfefficacyandselfregulationinearlycareerresearchers |