Cargando…

106 Neurosurgery Resident Feedback through Artificial-Intelligence

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Surgical training is constrained by duty hour limits, bias, and a trial-and-error learning process. Surgeon skill variation is a healthcare system disparity that can impact patient outcomes. Incorporating validated, standardized assessment tools and machine learning (ML) algorithms...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Porras, Jose Luis, Soberanis-Mukul, Roger, Vedula, S. Swaroop, Huang, Judy, Brem, Henry, Gallia, Gary L., Unberath, Mathias, Ishii, Masaru
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10129616/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.189
_version_ 1785030786470117376
author Porras, Jose Luis
Soberanis-Mukul, Roger
Vedula, S. Swaroop
Huang, Judy
Brem, Henry
Gallia, Gary L.
Unberath, Mathias
Ishii, Masaru
author_facet Porras, Jose Luis
Soberanis-Mukul, Roger
Vedula, S. Swaroop
Huang, Judy
Brem, Henry
Gallia, Gary L.
Unberath, Mathias
Ishii, Masaru
author_sort Porras, Jose Luis
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Surgical training is constrained by duty hour limits, bias, and a trial-and-error learning process. Surgeon skill variation is a healthcare system disparity that can impact patient outcomes. Incorporating validated, standardized assessment tools and machine learning (ML) algorithms may help to standardize and reduce bias in surgeon education. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: To support assessment tool and ML algorithm development, we are curating an annotated video registry of neurosurgical procedures. Point-of-view video of resident and attending neurosurgeons performing craniotomies is recorded via an eye-tracking headset. A Delphi panel of neurosurgeons will review the video and determine which represent expert versus trainee performance. Neurosurgery attendings will be interviewed to provide descriptions of craniotomies which will be used to develop an assessment rubric. A Delphi panel will determine what rubric components should be maintained. New craniotomy videos will be viewed by attendings in a blinded fashion while completing the assessment rubric. An online feedback platform is being developed allowing residents to prospectively track assessment data. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: We anticipate development of an annotated, institutional video database featuring craniotomies performed by residents and attending neurosurgeons. Using a Delphi approach, we anticipate achieving consensus on which videos reflect expert versus trainee performance. We anticipate development of a novel craniotomy assessment rubric that is both valid and reliable. Our online feedback platform will allow prospective tracking of assessment data from multiple sources and enhanced transparency in the feedback process. The video registry and assessment data will enable development of novel ML algorithms able to recognize craniotomy segments and estimate operator skill. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Building a video registry of procedures, validated assessment tools, and a prototype feedback platform enables a pipeline for ML algorithm development. Together these tools will help to standardize and optimize resident education translating to earlier operative independence, improved patient safety, and reduced bias during surgical training.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10129616
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101296162023-04-26 106 Neurosurgery Resident Feedback through Artificial-Intelligence Porras, Jose Luis Soberanis-Mukul, Roger Vedula, S. Swaroop Huang, Judy Brem, Henry Gallia, Gary L. Unberath, Mathias Ishii, Masaru J Clin Transl Sci Education, Career Development and Workforce Development OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Surgical training is constrained by duty hour limits, bias, and a trial-and-error learning process. Surgeon skill variation is a healthcare system disparity that can impact patient outcomes. Incorporating validated, standardized assessment tools and machine learning (ML) algorithms may help to standardize and reduce bias in surgeon education. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: To support assessment tool and ML algorithm development, we are curating an annotated video registry of neurosurgical procedures. Point-of-view video of resident and attending neurosurgeons performing craniotomies is recorded via an eye-tracking headset. A Delphi panel of neurosurgeons will review the video and determine which represent expert versus trainee performance. Neurosurgery attendings will be interviewed to provide descriptions of craniotomies which will be used to develop an assessment rubric. A Delphi panel will determine what rubric components should be maintained. New craniotomy videos will be viewed by attendings in a blinded fashion while completing the assessment rubric. An online feedback platform is being developed allowing residents to prospectively track assessment data. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: We anticipate development of an annotated, institutional video database featuring craniotomies performed by residents and attending neurosurgeons. Using a Delphi approach, we anticipate achieving consensus on which videos reflect expert versus trainee performance. We anticipate development of a novel craniotomy assessment rubric that is both valid and reliable. Our online feedback platform will allow prospective tracking of assessment data from multiple sources and enhanced transparency in the feedback process. The video registry and assessment data will enable development of novel ML algorithms able to recognize craniotomy segments and estimate operator skill. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Building a video registry of procedures, validated assessment tools, and a prototype feedback platform enables a pipeline for ML algorithm development. Together these tools will help to standardize and optimize resident education translating to earlier operative independence, improved patient safety, and reduced bias during surgical training. Cambridge University Press 2023-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10129616/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.189 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
spellingShingle Education, Career Development and Workforce Development
Porras, Jose Luis
Soberanis-Mukul, Roger
Vedula, S. Swaroop
Huang, Judy
Brem, Henry
Gallia, Gary L.
Unberath, Mathias
Ishii, Masaru
106 Neurosurgery Resident Feedback through Artificial-Intelligence
title 106 Neurosurgery Resident Feedback through Artificial-Intelligence
title_full 106 Neurosurgery Resident Feedback through Artificial-Intelligence
title_fullStr 106 Neurosurgery Resident Feedback through Artificial-Intelligence
title_full_unstemmed 106 Neurosurgery Resident Feedback through Artificial-Intelligence
title_short 106 Neurosurgery Resident Feedback through Artificial-Intelligence
title_sort 106 neurosurgery resident feedback through artificial-intelligence
topic Education, Career Development and Workforce Development
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10129616/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.189
work_keys_str_mv AT porrasjoseluis 106neurosurgeryresidentfeedbackthroughartificialintelligence
AT soberanismukulroger 106neurosurgeryresidentfeedbackthroughartificialintelligence
AT vedulasswaroop 106neurosurgeryresidentfeedbackthroughartificialintelligence
AT huangjudy 106neurosurgeryresidentfeedbackthroughartificialintelligence
AT bremhenry 106neurosurgeryresidentfeedbackthroughartificialintelligence
AT galliagaryl 106neurosurgeryresidentfeedbackthroughartificialintelligence
AT unberathmathias 106neurosurgeryresidentfeedbackthroughartificialintelligence
AT ishiimasaru 106neurosurgeryresidentfeedbackthroughartificialintelligence