64 Finite Element Analysis of a Porous Dual Component 3D-Printed Bone Graft for Alveolar Ridge Augmentation

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Our goal was to assess the ability of a 3D-Printed dual cover-core design alveolar ridge bone graft, to withstand the average maximum masticatory force of a healthy person. To this end, we characterized the materials, ran a finite element analysis (FEA) model, and validated it using a resin 3D-printed version tested under compression with strain gauges. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: A tricalcium-phosphate/hydroxyapatite paste and mixed methacrylated alginate-gelatin were used for the core, and polycaprolactone for the cover. These were characterized using ASTM standards D695 and D638 for compression, tensile, and rheological testing. Then we converted cone CT-scan images of a mandibular alveolar ridge defect to an .stl file, and designed the cover and core in Meshmixer. The model was then imported into ANSYS 11.0, and a downward compression force of 500 N, the maximum masticatory force of a healthy adult, was applied on the graft and mandible’s top ridge. The different models included solid and porous covers and cores, as well as comparing screws on one or both sides of the cover, then validated by compressing a resin 3D-printed versions. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The FEA model provided maximum displacements, Von Mises stress (VMS), and stress/strain values for each model. The highest maximum displacement was found on the solid covers with a combination of both buccal and lingual screws, at 0.162 mm. The lowest maximum displacement was found in the porous cover at 0.085 mm. All VMS values were below the tensile yield strength, meaning that the materials would not yield. The highest maximum stress was found on the porous cover at 13.52 MPa, the lowest was 1.06 MPa on the cover with no screws. The highest strain was found on the porous model at 0.010, which was 5.6x higher than the solid cover. The porous cover also showed less stress shielding, thus allowing a beneficial mechanical stimulation of the bone, and the lowest maximum displacement, possibly due to flexion through the pores. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Preliminary FEA models demonstrated that for the considered materials, a cover-core design of the mandibular implant would sustain the desired 500 N of force without yielding. The porous cover provides the most benefits, causing the least stress shielding and allowing diffusion of biological factors to support the osteoinductive role of the core.