Cargando…
79 Role of Neurocritical Care Physicians in Traumatic Brain Injury Systems of Care and Research: Perspectives from Provider Surveys
OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The purpose of this small survey-based study was to characterize the current role of neurocritical care physicians in traumatic brain injury (TBI) systems of care and research. In doing so, we aim to highlight potential roles of neurology providers in the medical management and enh...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10129676/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.163 |
_version_ | 1785030801692295168 |
---|---|
author | Poblete, Roy A. Nguyen, Chris Lyden, Patrick D. Freeman, William D. Sung, Gene |
author_facet | Poblete, Roy A. Nguyen, Chris Lyden, Patrick D. Freeman, William D. Sung, Gene |
author_sort | Poblete, Roy A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The purpose of this small survey-based study was to characterize the current role of neurocritical care physicians in traumatic brain injury (TBI) systems of care and research. In doing so, we aim to highlight potential roles of neurology providers in the medical management and enhancement of translational science in the field of TBI. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Between April and June 2021, a web-based survey was disseminated by email to members of the Neurocritical Care Society. The survey was open to all physician providers. A total of 36 surveys were completed. The survey consisted of 18 questions with pre-defined answer choices. Survey questions aimed to determine areas of practice, primary clinical specialty, hospital practice setting, provider involvement in TBI care, provider involvement in TBI research, and current research roles. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: 92% of survey respondents were in the United States (n=33), representing all national regions. 75% of the physicians were neurocritical care trained (n=27). 69% of providers were practicing in academic institutions while 78% were at sites designated as Level I trauma centers. All respondents managed acute TBI, but 50% served as consultants rather than being the primary service provider. At their sites of practice, 31% of patients were on non-neuroscience services, especially those with non-neurologic traumatic injury. Only 36% reported that TBI protocols were written and adhered to at their site. Only 44% reported that TBI research was performed at their site, while 50% had interest in participating in TBI research. TBI was the primary area of research for 17% of physicians. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: This small physician survey highlights heterogeneity in TBI systems-based practice and research roles. Areas of potential improvement include greater involvement of neurocritical care physicians in TBI management, protocol-building and implementation, and TBI research. Reasons for current barriers are multifactorial and will be discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10129676 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101296762023-04-26 79 Role of Neurocritical Care Physicians in Traumatic Brain Injury Systems of Care and Research: Perspectives from Provider Surveys Poblete, Roy A. Nguyen, Chris Lyden, Patrick D. Freeman, William D. Sung, Gene J Clin Transl Sci Contemporary Research Challenges OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The purpose of this small survey-based study was to characterize the current role of neurocritical care physicians in traumatic brain injury (TBI) systems of care and research. In doing so, we aim to highlight potential roles of neurology providers in the medical management and enhancement of translational science in the field of TBI. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Between April and June 2021, a web-based survey was disseminated by email to members of the Neurocritical Care Society. The survey was open to all physician providers. A total of 36 surveys were completed. The survey consisted of 18 questions with pre-defined answer choices. Survey questions aimed to determine areas of practice, primary clinical specialty, hospital practice setting, provider involvement in TBI care, provider involvement in TBI research, and current research roles. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: 92% of survey respondents were in the United States (n=33), representing all national regions. 75% of the physicians were neurocritical care trained (n=27). 69% of providers were practicing in academic institutions while 78% were at sites designated as Level I trauma centers. All respondents managed acute TBI, but 50% served as consultants rather than being the primary service provider. At their sites of practice, 31% of patients were on non-neuroscience services, especially those with non-neurologic traumatic injury. Only 36% reported that TBI protocols were written and adhered to at their site. Only 44% reported that TBI research was performed at their site, while 50% had interest in participating in TBI research. TBI was the primary area of research for 17% of physicians. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: This small physician survey highlights heterogeneity in TBI systems-based practice and research roles. Areas of potential improvement include greater involvement of neurocritical care physicians in TBI management, protocol-building and implementation, and TBI research. Reasons for current barriers are multifactorial and will be discussed. Cambridge University Press 2023-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10129676/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.163 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work. |
spellingShingle | Contemporary Research Challenges Poblete, Roy A. Nguyen, Chris Lyden, Patrick D. Freeman, William D. Sung, Gene 79 Role of Neurocritical Care Physicians in Traumatic Brain Injury Systems of Care and Research: Perspectives from Provider Surveys |
title | 79 Role of Neurocritical Care Physicians in Traumatic Brain Injury Systems of Care and Research: Perspectives from Provider Surveys |
title_full | 79 Role of Neurocritical Care Physicians in Traumatic Brain Injury Systems of Care and Research: Perspectives from Provider Surveys |
title_fullStr | 79 Role of Neurocritical Care Physicians in Traumatic Brain Injury Systems of Care and Research: Perspectives from Provider Surveys |
title_full_unstemmed | 79 Role of Neurocritical Care Physicians in Traumatic Brain Injury Systems of Care and Research: Perspectives from Provider Surveys |
title_short | 79 Role of Neurocritical Care Physicians in Traumatic Brain Injury Systems of Care and Research: Perspectives from Provider Surveys |
title_sort | 79 role of neurocritical care physicians in traumatic brain injury systems of care and research: perspectives from provider surveys |
topic | Contemporary Research Challenges |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10129676/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.163 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pobleteroya 79roleofneurocriticalcarephysiciansintraumaticbraininjurysystemsofcareandresearchperspectivesfromprovidersurveys AT nguyenchris 79roleofneurocriticalcarephysiciansintraumaticbraininjurysystemsofcareandresearchperspectivesfromprovidersurveys AT lydenpatrickd 79roleofneurocriticalcarephysiciansintraumaticbraininjurysystemsofcareandresearchperspectivesfromprovidersurveys AT freemanwilliamd 79roleofneurocriticalcarephysiciansintraumaticbraininjurysystemsofcareandresearchperspectivesfromprovidersurveys AT sunggene 79roleofneurocriticalcarephysiciansintraumaticbraininjurysystemsofcareandresearchperspectivesfromprovidersurveys |