Cargando…

79 Role of Neurocritical Care Physicians in Traumatic Brain Injury Systems of Care and Research: Perspectives from Provider Surveys

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The purpose of this small survey-based study was to characterize the current role of neurocritical care physicians in traumatic brain injury (TBI) systems of care and research. In doing so, we aim to highlight potential roles of neurology providers in the medical management and enh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Poblete, Roy A., Nguyen, Chris, Lyden, Patrick D., Freeman, William D., Sung, Gene
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10129676/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.163
_version_ 1785030801692295168
author Poblete, Roy A.
Nguyen, Chris
Lyden, Patrick D.
Freeman, William D.
Sung, Gene
author_facet Poblete, Roy A.
Nguyen, Chris
Lyden, Patrick D.
Freeman, William D.
Sung, Gene
author_sort Poblete, Roy A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The purpose of this small survey-based study was to characterize the current role of neurocritical care physicians in traumatic brain injury (TBI) systems of care and research. In doing so, we aim to highlight potential roles of neurology providers in the medical management and enhancement of translational science in the field of TBI. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Between April and June 2021, a web-based survey was disseminated by email to members of the Neurocritical Care Society. The survey was open to all physician providers. A total of 36 surveys were completed. The survey consisted of 18 questions with pre-defined answer choices. Survey questions aimed to determine areas of practice, primary clinical specialty, hospital practice setting, provider involvement in TBI care, provider involvement in TBI research, and current research roles. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: 92% of survey respondents were in the United States (n=33), representing all national regions. 75% of the physicians were neurocritical care trained (n=27). 69% of providers were practicing in academic institutions while 78% were at sites designated as Level I trauma centers. All respondents managed acute TBI, but 50% served as consultants rather than being the primary service provider. At their sites of practice, 31% of patients were on non-neuroscience services, especially those with non-neurologic traumatic injury. Only 36% reported that TBI protocols were written and adhered to at their site. Only 44% reported that TBI research was performed at their site, while 50% had interest in participating in TBI research. TBI was the primary area of research for 17% of physicians. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: This small physician survey highlights heterogeneity in TBI systems-based practice and research roles. Areas of potential improvement include greater involvement of neurocritical care physicians in TBI management, protocol-building and implementation, and TBI research. Reasons for current barriers are multifactorial and will be discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10129676
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101296762023-04-26 79 Role of Neurocritical Care Physicians in Traumatic Brain Injury Systems of Care and Research: Perspectives from Provider Surveys Poblete, Roy A. Nguyen, Chris Lyden, Patrick D. Freeman, William D. Sung, Gene J Clin Transl Sci Contemporary Research Challenges OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The purpose of this small survey-based study was to characterize the current role of neurocritical care physicians in traumatic brain injury (TBI) systems of care and research. In doing so, we aim to highlight potential roles of neurology providers in the medical management and enhancement of translational science in the field of TBI. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Between April and June 2021, a web-based survey was disseminated by email to members of the Neurocritical Care Society. The survey was open to all physician providers. A total of 36 surveys were completed. The survey consisted of 18 questions with pre-defined answer choices. Survey questions aimed to determine areas of practice, primary clinical specialty, hospital practice setting, provider involvement in TBI care, provider involvement in TBI research, and current research roles. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: 92% of survey respondents were in the United States (n=33), representing all national regions. 75% of the physicians were neurocritical care trained (n=27). 69% of providers were practicing in academic institutions while 78% were at sites designated as Level I trauma centers. All respondents managed acute TBI, but 50% served as consultants rather than being the primary service provider. At their sites of practice, 31% of patients were on non-neuroscience services, especially those with non-neurologic traumatic injury. Only 36% reported that TBI protocols were written and adhered to at their site. Only 44% reported that TBI research was performed at their site, while 50% had interest in participating in TBI research. TBI was the primary area of research for 17% of physicians. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: This small physician survey highlights heterogeneity in TBI systems-based practice and research roles. Areas of potential improvement include greater involvement of neurocritical care physicians in TBI management, protocol-building and implementation, and TBI research. Reasons for current barriers are multifactorial and will be discussed. Cambridge University Press 2023-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10129676/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.163 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
spellingShingle Contemporary Research Challenges
Poblete, Roy A.
Nguyen, Chris
Lyden, Patrick D.
Freeman, William D.
Sung, Gene
79 Role of Neurocritical Care Physicians in Traumatic Brain Injury Systems of Care and Research: Perspectives from Provider Surveys
title 79 Role of Neurocritical Care Physicians in Traumatic Brain Injury Systems of Care and Research: Perspectives from Provider Surveys
title_full 79 Role of Neurocritical Care Physicians in Traumatic Brain Injury Systems of Care and Research: Perspectives from Provider Surveys
title_fullStr 79 Role of Neurocritical Care Physicians in Traumatic Brain Injury Systems of Care and Research: Perspectives from Provider Surveys
title_full_unstemmed 79 Role of Neurocritical Care Physicians in Traumatic Brain Injury Systems of Care and Research: Perspectives from Provider Surveys
title_short 79 Role of Neurocritical Care Physicians in Traumatic Brain Injury Systems of Care and Research: Perspectives from Provider Surveys
title_sort 79 role of neurocritical care physicians in traumatic brain injury systems of care and research: perspectives from provider surveys
topic Contemporary Research Challenges
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10129676/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.163
work_keys_str_mv AT pobleteroya 79roleofneurocriticalcarephysiciansintraumaticbraininjurysystemsofcareandresearchperspectivesfromprovidersurveys
AT nguyenchris 79roleofneurocriticalcarephysiciansintraumaticbraininjurysystemsofcareandresearchperspectivesfromprovidersurveys
AT lydenpatrickd 79roleofneurocriticalcarephysiciansintraumaticbraininjurysystemsofcareandresearchperspectivesfromprovidersurveys
AT freemanwilliamd 79roleofneurocriticalcarephysiciansintraumaticbraininjurysystemsofcareandresearchperspectivesfromprovidersurveys
AT sunggene 79roleofneurocriticalcarephysiciansintraumaticbraininjurysystemsofcareandresearchperspectivesfromprovidersurveys