Cargando…

26 Mandibular Advancement vs Home Treatment for Primary Snoring: A Randomized Trial

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The primary aim is to evaluate the efficacy of a Mandibular Advancement Device (MAD) vs conservative treatment for adults with non-apneic snoring, as measured by the sleeping partner. The secondary aim is to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment of snoring on the sleeping partner...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ioerger, Patrick, Kallogjeri, Dorina, Piccirillo, Jay F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10129709/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.123
_version_ 1785030809704464384
author Ioerger, Patrick
Kallogjeri, Dorina
Piccirillo, Jay F.
author_facet Ioerger, Patrick
Kallogjeri, Dorina
Piccirillo, Jay F.
author_sort Ioerger, Patrick
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The primary aim is to evaluate the efficacy of a Mandibular Advancement Device (MAD) vs conservative treatment for adults with non-apneic snoring, as measured by the sleeping partner. The secondary aim is to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment of snoring on the sleeping partner’s sleep quality. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We plan to enroll 60 pairs of primary snorers and their sleeping partners in our randomized clinical trial. Snorers will be randomized to either 4 weeks of conservative therapy, consisting of nightly Mometasone nasal rinse, breathe-rite strips, mouth taping, and lateral positional therapy, or 4 weeks of Mandibular Advancement Device therapy (MAD). 30 pairs of snorers and their partners will be in each arm. At follow up the primary outcome measure, the Clinical Global Impression of Improvement Scale (CGI-I), will be assessed by the sleeping partner to evaluate the response to snoring treatment. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: To date, there is no study reporting the rate of response in participants using MAD in Primary Snoring. Due to lack of preliminary data and effect size, we hypothesize that the rate of the responders in the MAD group will be 20% higher than the rate of responders in the active control group based on literature studies and preliminary results. A responder will be classified as someone whose sleeping partner rates on the CGI-I scale that the snoring was much improved or very much improved. MAD has been shown previously to be an effective therapy at treating sleep apnea and reducing snoring, and we anticipate it will continue to be so for patients who do not have sleep apnea. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Snoring is a nearly ubiquitous problem that prevents restful sleep for spouses of snorers, which is known to have detrimental health effects. Yet it does not have scientifically proven treatments. Our study will evaluate these treatments in an effort to improve the health of the sleeping partners.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10129709
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101297092023-04-26 26 Mandibular Advancement vs Home Treatment for Primary Snoring: A Randomized Trial Ioerger, Patrick Kallogjeri, Dorina Piccirillo, Jay F. J Clin Transl Sci Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Research Design OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The primary aim is to evaluate the efficacy of a Mandibular Advancement Device (MAD) vs conservative treatment for adults with non-apneic snoring, as measured by the sleeping partner. The secondary aim is to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment of snoring on the sleeping partner’s sleep quality. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We plan to enroll 60 pairs of primary snorers and their sleeping partners in our randomized clinical trial. Snorers will be randomized to either 4 weeks of conservative therapy, consisting of nightly Mometasone nasal rinse, breathe-rite strips, mouth taping, and lateral positional therapy, or 4 weeks of Mandibular Advancement Device therapy (MAD). 30 pairs of snorers and their partners will be in each arm. At follow up the primary outcome measure, the Clinical Global Impression of Improvement Scale (CGI-I), will be assessed by the sleeping partner to evaluate the response to snoring treatment. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: To date, there is no study reporting the rate of response in participants using MAD in Primary Snoring. Due to lack of preliminary data and effect size, we hypothesize that the rate of the responders in the MAD group will be 20% higher than the rate of responders in the active control group based on literature studies and preliminary results. A responder will be classified as someone whose sleeping partner rates on the CGI-I scale that the snoring was much improved or very much improved. MAD has been shown previously to be an effective therapy at treating sleep apnea and reducing snoring, and we anticipate it will continue to be so for patients who do not have sleep apnea. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Snoring is a nearly ubiquitous problem that prevents restful sleep for spouses of snorers, which is known to have detrimental health effects. Yet it does not have scientifically proven treatments. Our study will evaluate these treatments in an effort to improve the health of the sleeping partners. Cambridge University Press 2023-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10129709/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.123 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
spellingShingle Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Research Design
Ioerger, Patrick
Kallogjeri, Dorina
Piccirillo, Jay F.
26 Mandibular Advancement vs Home Treatment for Primary Snoring: A Randomized Trial
title 26 Mandibular Advancement vs Home Treatment for Primary Snoring: A Randomized Trial
title_full 26 Mandibular Advancement vs Home Treatment for Primary Snoring: A Randomized Trial
title_fullStr 26 Mandibular Advancement vs Home Treatment for Primary Snoring: A Randomized Trial
title_full_unstemmed 26 Mandibular Advancement vs Home Treatment for Primary Snoring: A Randomized Trial
title_short 26 Mandibular Advancement vs Home Treatment for Primary Snoring: A Randomized Trial
title_sort 26 mandibular advancement vs home treatment for primary snoring: a randomized trial
topic Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Research Design
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10129709/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.123
work_keys_str_mv AT ioergerpatrick 26mandibularadvancementvshometreatmentforprimarysnoringarandomizedtrial
AT kallogjeridorina 26mandibularadvancementvshometreatmentforprimarysnoringarandomizedtrial
AT piccirillojayf 26mandibularadvancementvshometreatmentforprimarysnoringarandomizedtrial