Cargando…

245 Do they REALLY Trust Us?: The Importance of Trust and Trustworthiness in All IN for Health

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The critical role that trust plays continues to be documented and highlights the gap in understanding the extent to which initiatives such as All IN for Health from the Indiana Clinical and Translational Institute (I-CTSI) can improve trust between the community and researchers. We...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sotto-Santiago, Sylk, Hudson, Brenda, Claxton, Gina, Delp, Lynsey, Lynch, Dustin, Wiehe, Sarah, Moe, Sharon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10129802/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.312
_version_ 1785030834125799424
author Sotto-Santiago, Sylk
Hudson, Brenda
Claxton, Gina
Delp, Lynsey
Lynch, Dustin
Wiehe, Sarah
Moe, Sharon
author_facet Sotto-Santiago, Sylk
Hudson, Brenda
Claxton, Gina
Delp, Lynsey
Lynch, Dustin
Wiehe, Sarah
Moe, Sharon
author_sort Sotto-Santiago, Sylk
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The critical role that trust plays continues to be documented and highlights the gap in understanding the extent to which initiatives such as All IN for Health from the Indiana Clinical and Translational Institute (I-CTSI) can improve trust between the community and researchers. We discuss measures of trust and evaluate how we may improve recruitment. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: In this study, we invited over 13000 volunteers from the All IN for Health research participant registry. Six hundred and sixty-three (663) respondents participated in the survey. The Relationship of Trust and Research Engagement Survey included three validated surveys: Distrust in Healthcare Organizations, the Trust in Medical Researchers scale by Hall et. al, and Patient Trust in Medical Researchers by Mainous et al.. The 36-item survey also included open-text questions. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Based on preliminary results 74% agreed it’s safe to be in medical research, yet 79% had never been asked to participate in medical research by their doctor. Sixty percent believed that HCOs put money above patients’ needs. Forty percent agreed that doctors do medical research for selfish reasons. Fifty percent disagree that patients get the same medical treatment regardless of race/ethnicity. Moreover, 28 % agree that medical researchers act differently toward minorities. Between 9 and 11% believe that researchers select minorities for their most dangerous studies and some projects are secretly designed to expose minoritized groups to diseases. Our next step is to disaggregate the data by race and ethnicity and evaluate these answers. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: This study's population willingly engaged in a research registry making their diminished trust quite alarming. Amongst the general population, trust in scientists is now below pre-pandemic levels. We must critically assess our own trustworthiness, and critically reflect on the authenticity of our efforts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10129802
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101298022023-04-26 245 Do they REALLY Trust Us?: The Importance of Trust and Trustworthiness in All IN for Health Sotto-Santiago, Sylk Hudson, Brenda Claxton, Gina Delp, Lynsey Lynch, Dustin Wiehe, Sarah Moe, Sharon J Clin Transl Sci Health Equity and Community Engagement OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The critical role that trust plays continues to be documented and highlights the gap in understanding the extent to which initiatives such as All IN for Health from the Indiana Clinical and Translational Institute (I-CTSI) can improve trust between the community and researchers. We discuss measures of trust and evaluate how we may improve recruitment. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: In this study, we invited over 13000 volunteers from the All IN for Health research participant registry. Six hundred and sixty-three (663) respondents participated in the survey. The Relationship of Trust and Research Engagement Survey included three validated surveys: Distrust in Healthcare Organizations, the Trust in Medical Researchers scale by Hall et. al, and Patient Trust in Medical Researchers by Mainous et al.. The 36-item survey also included open-text questions. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Based on preliminary results 74% agreed it’s safe to be in medical research, yet 79% had never been asked to participate in medical research by their doctor. Sixty percent believed that HCOs put money above patients’ needs. Forty percent agreed that doctors do medical research for selfish reasons. Fifty percent disagree that patients get the same medical treatment regardless of race/ethnicity. Moreover, 28 % agree that medical researchers act differently toward minorities. Between 9 and 11% believe that researchers select minorities for their most dangerous studies and some projects are secretly designed to expose minoritized groups to diseases. Our next step is to disaggregate the data by race and ethnicity and evaluate these answers. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: This study's population willingly engaged in a research registry making their diminished trust quite alarming. Amongst the general population, trust in scientists is now below pre-pandemic levels. We must critically assess our own trustworthiness, and critically reflect on the authenticity of our efforts. Cambridge University Press 2023-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10129802/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.312 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
spellingShingle Health Equity and Community Engagement
Sotto-Santiago, Sylk
Hudson, Brenda
Claxton, Gina
Delp, Lynsey
Lynch, Dustin
Wiehe, Sarah
Moe, Sharon
245 Do they REALLY Trust Us?: The Importance of Trust and Trustworthiness in All IN for Health
title 245 Do they REALLY Trust Us?: The Importance of Trust and Trustworthiness in All IN for Health
title_full 245 Do they REALLY Trust Us?: The Importance of Trust and Trustworthiness in All IN for Health
title_fullStr 245 Do they REALLY Trust Us?: The Importance of Trust and Trustworthiness in All IN for Health
title_full_unstemmed 245 Do they REALLY Trust Us?: The Importance of Trust and Trustworthiness in All IN for Health
title_short 245 Do they REALLY Trust Us?: The Importance of Trust and Trustworthiness in All IN for Health
title_sort 245 do they really trust us?: the importance of trust and trustworthiness in all in for health
topic Health Equity and Community Engagement
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10129802/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.312
work_keys_str_mv AT sottosantiagosylk 245dotheyreallytrustustheimportanceoftrustandtrustworthinessinallinforhealth
AT hudsonbrenda 245dotheyreallytrustustheimportanceoftrustandtrustworthinessinallinforhealth
AT claxtongina 245dotheyreallytrustustheimportanceoftrustandtrustworthinessinallinforhealth
AT delplynsey 245dotheyreallytrustustheimportanceoftrustandtrustworthinessinallinforhealth
AT lynchdustin 245dotheyreallytrustustheimportanceoftrustandtrustworthinessinallinforhealth
AT wiehesarah 245dotheyreallytrustustheimportanceoftrustandtrustworthinessinallinforhealth
AT moesharon 245dotheyreallytrustustheimportanceoftrustandtrustworthinessinallinforhealth