Cargando…
153 Adapting Motivational Interviewing for Vaccine Hesitancy in Underserved Communities
OBJECTIVES/GOALS: To adapt and evaluate motivational interviewing (MI) as a tool for better understanding the beliefs that underlie vaccine hesitancy and effectively respond to these beliefs with emphasis on reaching underserved communities disproportionately impacted by COVID-19. METHODS/STUDY POPU...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10129808/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.234 |
_version_ | 1785030835549765632 |
---|---|
author | Douglas, Jabari Bauer, Edward Cain, Gloria Scott, Denise Mellman, Thomas A. |
author_facet | Douglas, Jabari Bauer, Edward Cain, Gloria Scott, Denise Mellman, Thomas A. |
author_sort | Douglas, Jabari |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES/GOALS: To adapt and evaluate motivational interviewing (MI) as a tool for better understanding the beliefs that underlie vaccine hesitancy and effectively respond to these beliefs with emphasis on reaching underserved communities disproportionately impacted by COVID-19. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Our group reviewed the principals for motivational interviewing, rationale for vaccination, and likely beliefs underlying hesitancy and developed a guide for MI to address vaccine hesitancy. We recruited lay members of Black and Hispanic communities in Washington, DC and Baltimore, MD. 90-minute zoom facilitator training sessions included didactic material, questions and discussion, and role playing. We were not successful recruiting unvaccinated individuals to provide written consent to be followed re vaccination status. Facilitators indicated incorporating MI in their job-related and informal interactions. Surveys were developed to obtain feedback regarding beliefs underlying hesitancy, perceptions of MI effectiveness, and more recently (Oct 2022), evolving concerns regarding the pandemic. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: 67% of facilitators were Black, their average age was 39 years, and 67% had at least a high school education. All had received a COVID-19 vaccination. 82% endorsed utilizing MI in discussions receiving the COVID-19 vaccine. 46% of the facilitators endorsed that MI was moderately effective (46%) in clarifying objections and very effective (50%) in persuading friends, family, and co-workers to consider getting vaccinated. The most common elicited objections to the vaccine were side-effects (21%) and beliefs in government conspiracies (21%). In the second survey respondents indicated receiving another booster followed by getting their children vaccinated as the most common identified concerns. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: MI can be adapted to address vaccine hesitancy in underserved minority groups and appears promising for identifying beliefs underlying hesitancy and possibly for increasing vaccination rates among these communities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10129808 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101298082023-04-26 153 Adapting Motivational Interviewing for Vaccine Hesitancy in Underserved Communities Douglas, Jabari Bauer, Edward Cain, Gloria Scott, Denise Mellman, Thomas A. J Clin Transl Sci Health Equity and Community Engagement OBJECTIVES/GOALS: To adapt and evaluate motivational interviewing (MI) as a tool for better understanding the beliefs that underlie vaccine hesitancy and effectively respond to these beliefs with emphasis on reaching underserved communities disproportionately impacted by COVID-19. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Our group reviewed the principals for motivational interviewing, rationale for vaccination, and likely beliefs underlying hesitancy and developed a guide for MI to address vaccine hesitancy. We recruited lay members of Black and Hispanic communities in Washington, DC and Baltimore, MD. 90-minute zoom facilitator training sessions included didactic material, questions and discussion, and role playing. We were not successful recruiting unvaccinated individuals to provide written consent to be followed re vaccination status. Facilitators indicated incorporating MI in their job-related and informal interactions. Surveys were developed to obtain feedback regarding beliefs underlying hesitancy, perceptions of MI effectiveness, and more recently (Oct 2022), evolving concerns regarding the pandemic. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: 67% of facilitators were Black, their average age was 39 years, and 67% had at least a high school education. All had received a COVID-19 vaccination. 82% endorsed utilizing MI in discussions receiving the COVID-19 vaccine. 46% of the facilitators endorsed that MI was moderately effective (46%) in clarifying objections and very effective (50%) in persuading friends, family, and co-workers to consider getting vaccinated. The most common elicited objections to the vaccine were side-effects (21%) and beliefs in government conspiracies (21%). In the second survey respondents indicated receiving another booster followed by getting their children vaccinated as the most common identified concerns. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: MI can be adapted to address vaccine hesitancy in underserved minority groups and appears promising for identifying beliefs underlying hesitancy and possibly for increasing vaccination rates among these communities. Cambridge University Press 2023-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10129808/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.234 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work. |
spellingShingle | Health Equity and Community Engagement Douglas, Jabari Bauer, Edward Cain, Gloria Scott, Denise Mellman, Thomas A. 153 Adapting Motivational Interviewing for Vaccine Hesitancy in Underserved Communities |
title | 153 Adapting Motivational Interviewing for Vaccine Hesitancy in Underserved Communities |
title_full | 153 Adapting Motivational Interviewing for Vaccine Hesitancy in Underserved Communities |
title_fullStr | 153 Adapting Motivational Interviewing for Vaccine Hesitancy in Underserved Communities |
title_full_unstemmed | 153 Adapting Motivational Interviewing for Vaccine Hesitancy in Underserved Communities |
title_short | 153 Adapting Motivational Interviewing for Vaccine Hesitancy in Underserved Communities |
title_sort | 153 adapting motivational interviewing for vaccine hesitancy in underserved communities |
topic | Health Equity and Community Engagement |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10129808/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.234 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT douglasjabari 153adaptingmotivationalinterviewingforvaccinehesitancyinunderservedcommunities AT baueredward 153adaptingmotivationalinterviewingforvaccinehesitancyinunderservedcommunities AT caingloria 153adaptingmotivationalinterviewingforvaccinehesitancyinunderservedcommunities AT scottdenise 153adaptingmotivationalinterviewingforvaccinehesitancyinunderservedcommunities AT mellmanthomasa 153adaptingmotivationalinterviewingforvaccinehesitancyinunderservedcommunities |