Cargando…

153 Adapting Motivational Interviewing for Vaccine Hesitancy in Underserved Communities

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: To adapt and evaluate motivational interviewing (MI) as a tool for better understanding the beliefs that underlie vaccine hesitancy and effectively respond to these beliefs with emphasis on reaching underserved communities disproportionately impacted by COVID-19. METHODS/STUDY POPU...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Douglas, Jabari, Bauer, Edward, Cain, Gloria, Scott, Denise, Mellman, Thomas A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10129808/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.234
_version_ 1785030835549765632
author Douglas, Jabari
Bauer, Edward
Cain, Gloria
Scott, Denise
Mellman, Thomas A.
author_facet Douglas, Jabari
Bauer, Edward
Cain, Gloria
Scott, Denise
Mellman, Thomas A.
author_sort Douglas, Jabari
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES/GOALS: To adapt and evaluate motivational interviewing (MI) as a tool for better understanding the beliefs that underlie vaccine hesitancy and effectively respond to these beliefs with emphasis on reaching underserved communities disproportionately impacted by COVID-19. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Our group reviewed the principals for motivational interviewing, rationale for vaccination, and likely beliefs underlying hesitancy and developed a guide for MI to address vaccine hesitancy. We recruited lay members of Black and Hispanic communities in Washington, DC and Baltimore, MD. 90-minute zoom facilitator training sessions included didactic material, questions and discussion, and role playing. We were not successful recruiting unvaccinated individuals to provide written consent to be followed re vaccination status. Facilitators indicated incorporating MI in their job-related and informal interactions. Surveys were developed to obtain feedback regarding beliefs underlying hesitancy, perceptions of MI effectiveness, and more recently (Oct 2022), evolving concerns regarding the pandemic. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: 67% of facilitators were Black, their average age was 39 years, and 67% had at least a high school education. All had received a COVID-19 vaccination. 82% endorsed utilizing MI in discussions receiving the COVID-19 vaccine. 46% of the facilitators endorsed that MI was moderately effective (46%) in clarifying objections and very effective (50%) in persuading friends, family, and co-workers to consider getting vaccinated. The most common elicited objections to the vaccine were side-effects (21%) and beliefs in government conspiracies (21%). In the second survey respondents indicated receiving another booster followed by getting their children vaccinated as the most common identified concerns. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: MI can be adapted to address vaccine hesitancy in underserved minority groups and appears promising for identifying beliefs underlying hesitancy and possibly for increasing vaccination rates among these communities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10129808
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101298082023-04-26 153 Adapting Motivational Interviewing for Vaccine Hesitancy in Underserved Communities Douglas, Jabari Bauer, Edward Cain, Gloria Scott, Denise Mellman, Thomas A. J Clin Transl Sci Health Equity and Community Engagement OBJECTIVES/GOALS: To adapt and evaluate motivational interviewing (MI) as a tool for better understanding the beliefs that underlie vaccine hesitancy and effectively respond to these beliefs with emphasis on reaching underserved communities disproportionately impacted by COVID-19. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Our group reviewed the principals for motivational interviewing, rationale for vaccination, and likely beliefs underlying hesitancy and developed a guide for MI to address vaccine hesitancy. We recruited lay members of Black and Hispanic communities in Washington, DC and Baltimore, MD. 90-minute zoom facilitator training sessions included didactic material, questions and discussion, and role playing. We were not successful recruiting unvaccinated individuals to provide written consent to be followed re vaccination status. Facilitators indicated incorporating MI in their job-related and informal interactions. Surveys were developed to obtain feedback regarding beliefs underlying hesitancy, perceptions of MI effectiveness, and more recently (Oct 2022), evolving concerns regarding the pandemic. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: 67% of facilitators were Black, their average age was 39 years, and 67% had at least a high school education. All had received a COVID-19 vaccination. 82% endorsed utilizing MI in discussions receiving the COVID-19 vaccine. 46% of the facilitators endorsed that MI was moderately effective (46%) in clarifying objections and very effective (50%) in persuading friends, family, and co-workers to consider getting vaccinated. The most common elicited objections to the vaccine were side-effects (21%) and beliefs in government conspiracies (21%). In the second survey respondents indicated receiving another booster followed by getting their children vaccinated as the most common identified concerns. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: MI can be adapted to address vaccine hesitancy in underserved minority groups and appears promising for identifying beliefs underlying hesitancy and possibly for increasing vaccination rates among these communities. Cambridge University Press 2023-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10129808/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.234 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
spellingShingle Health Equity and Community Engagement
Douglas, Jabari
Bauer, Edward
Cain, Gloria
Scott, Denise
Mellman, Thomas A.
153 Adapting Motivational Interviewing for Vaccine Hesitancy in Underserved Communities
title 153 Adapting Motivational Interviewing for Vaccine Hesitancy in Underserved Communities
title_full 153 Adapting Motivational Interviewing for Vaccine Hesitancy in Underserved Communities
title_fullStr 153 Adapting Motivational Interviewing for Vaccine Hesitancy in Underserved Communities
title_full_unstemmed 153 Adapting Motivational Interviewing for Vaccine Hesitancy in Underserved Communities
title_short 153 Adapting Motivational Interviewing for Vaccine Hesitancy in Underserved Communities
title_sort 153 adapting motivational interviewing for vaccine hesitancy in underserved communities
topic Health Equity and Community Engagement
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10129808/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.234
work_keys_str_mv AT douglasjabari 153adaptingmotivationalinterviewingforvaccinehesitancyinunderservedcommunities
AT baueredward 153adaptingmotivationalinterviewingforvaccinehesitancyinunderservedcommunities
AT caingloria 153adaptingmotivationalinterviewingforvaccinehesitancyinunderservedcommunities
AT scottdenise 153adaptingmotivationalinterviewingforvaccinehesitancyinunderservedcommunities
AT mellmanthomasa 153adaptingmotivationalinterviewingforvaccinehesitancyinunderservedcommunities