Cargando…

416 A Comparison of Bone Stresses in Transtibial and Transfemoral Osseointegrated Prostheses

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: This investigation aimed to develop and validate a subject-specific finite element analysis (FEA) model with subject-specific mechanical loads during walking and to use this method to compare mechanical stresses between transfemoral and transtibial osseointegrated (OI) implants. ME...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tinsley, Jake, Gaffney, Denver Brecca, Stoneback, Jason
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10129841/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.449
_version_ 1785030843645820928
author Tinsley, Jake
Gaffney, Denver Brecca
Stoneback, Jason
author_facet Tinsley, Jake
Gaffney, Denver Brecca
Stoneback, Jason
author_sort Tinsley, Jake
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES/GOALS: This investigation aimed to develop and validate a subject-specific finite element analysis (FEA) model with subject-specific mechanical loads during walking and to use this method to compare mechanical stresses between transfemoral and transtibial osseointegrated (OI) implants. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: One patient with a unilateral transtibial OI prosthesis and one with a unilateral transfemoral OI prosthesis participated in motion analysis to collect kinematics and ground reaction forces during overground walking. Subject-specific musculoskeletal models were created, and static optimization was used to estimate muscle and joint reaction forces throughout walking. 3D FEA models of the tibia, femur, and implants were created using ScanIP and exported into ABAQUS CAE. Muscle forces were applied at corresponding origin/insertion locations, determined from the musculoskeletal models [7]. Fixed boundary conditions were applied at proximal joint centers, and bone stresses throughout gait were calculated. OpenSim and FEA derived estimates of joint reaction forces were compared for validation. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: A maximum stress of 65.53 MPa and 60.70 MPa was observed at the bone-implant interface for the transtibial and transfemoral patients (respectively) in the late stance phase of the walking task, corresponding to terminal stance and heel off. Averaged root mean squared errors of the walking task (in the anterior-posterior, inferior-superior, and medial-lateral directions, respectively) for the transtibial and transfemoral patients were (124, 152, 80) N, (71, 80, 30) N, and (190, 62, 30) N, respectively. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The purpose of the above study was to develop a methodology for determining subject-specific mechanical loads during walking using finite element analysis and compare mechanical stresses in patients with transfemoral and transtibial OI. Similar stresses between the two implant types were found.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10129841
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101298412023-04-26 416 A Comparison of Bone Stresses in Transtibial and Transfemoral Osseointegrated Prostheses Tinsley, Jake Gaffney, Denver Brecca Stoneback, Jason J Clin Transl Sci Team Science OBJECTIVES/GOALS: This investigation aimed to develop and validate a subject-specific finite element analysis (FEA) model with subject-specific mechanical loads during walking and to use this method to compare mechanical stresses between transfemoral and transtibial osseointegrated (OI) implants. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: One patient with a unilateral transtibial OI prosthesis and one with a unilateral transfemoral OI prosthesis participated in motion analysis to collect kinematics and ground reaction forces during overground walking. Subject-specific musculoskeletal models were created, and static optimization was used to estimate muscle and joint reaction forces throughout walking. 3D FEA models of the tibia, femur, and implants were created using ScanIP and exported into ABAQUS CAE. Muscle forces were applied at corresponding origin/insertion locations, determined from the musculoskeletal models [7]. Fixed boundary conditions were applied at proximal joint centers, and bone stresses throughout gait were calculated. OpenSim and FEA derived estimates of joint reaction forces were compared for validation. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: A maximum stress of 65.53 MPa and 60.70 MPa was observed at the bone-implant interface for the transtibial and transfemoral patients (respectively) in the late stance phase of the walking task, corresponding to terminal stance and heel off. Averaged root mean squared errors of the walking task (in the anterior-posterior, inferior-superior, and medial-lateral directions, respectively) for the transtibial and transfemoral patients were (124, 152, 80) N, (71, 80, 30) N, and (190, 62, 30) N, respectively. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The purpose of the above study was to develop a methodology for determining subject-specific mechanical loads during walking using finite element analysis and compare mechanical stresses in patients with transfemoral and transtibial OI. Similar stresses between the two implant types were found. Cambridge University Press 2023-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10129841/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.449 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
spellingShingle Team Science
Tinsley, Jake
Gaffney, Denver Brecca
Stoneback, Jason
416 A Comparison of Bone Stresses in Transtibial and Transfemoral Osseointegrated Prostheses
title 416 A Comparison of Bone Stresses in Transtibial and Transfemoral Osseointegrated Prostheses
title_full 416 A Comparison of Bone Stresses in Transtibial and Transfemoral Osseointegrated Prostheses
title_fullStr 416 A Comparison of Bone Stresses in Transtibial and Transfemoral Osseointegrated Prostheses
title_full_unstemmed 416 A Comparison of Bone Stresses in Transtibial and Transfemoral Osseointegrated Prostheses
title_short 416 A Comparison of Bone Stresses in Transtibial and Transfemoral Osseointegrated Prostheses
title_sort 416 a comparison of bone stresses in transtibial and transfemoral osseointegrated prostheses
topic Team Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10129841/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.449
work_keys_str_mv AT tinsleyjake 416acomparisonofbonestressesintranstibialandtransfemoralosseointegratedprostheses
AT gaffneydenverbrecca 416acomparisonofbonestressesintranstibialandtransfemoralosseointegratedprostheses
AT stonebackjason 416acomparisonofbonestressesintranstibialandtransfemoralosseointegratedprostheses