Cargando…
Linguistic and non-linguistic cues in motion event endpoint description: The selection between English to and towards
The current study aims to explore the factors that could affect people’s description of a motion event endpoint. The study conducted by Liao, Dijkstra, and Zwaan (2021, Language and Cognition, 13[2], 161–190) found that two non-linguistic factors (i.e., the actor’s goal and the interlocutor’s social...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10129936/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36385446 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-022-01371-6 |
_version_ | 1785030864212590592 |
---|---|
author | Liao, Yiyun Dijkstra, Katinka Zwaan, Rolf A. |
author_facet | Liao, Yiyun Dijkstra, Katinka Zwaan, Rolf A. |
author_sort | Liao, Yiyun |
collection | PubMed |
description | The current study aims to explore the factors that could affect people’s description of a motion event endpoint. The study conducted by Liao, Dijkstra, and Zwaan (2021, Language and Cognition, 13[2], 161–190) found that two non-linguistic factors (i.e., the actor’s goal and the interlocutor’s social status) affect people’s choice between two Dutch directional prepositions (i.e., naar and richting) during event description tasks. The current study aims to extend these findings by examining the choice between a similar pair of directional prepositions in English (i.e., to and towards). Moreover, we aim to study whether grammatical aspect (i.e., the English simple present and the English progressive aspect) affects the sensitivity to the two non-linguistic factors and consequently also affects how people describe a motion event endpoint. In Experiment 1, we used the English simple present for all sentence stimuli (e.g., he walks (?) the trash bin). We found a significant effect of Interlocutor (the interlocutor’s social status) on preposition choice, but no significant effect of Intention (the actor’s goal). In Experiment 2, we replaced the English simple present with the English progressive aspect (e.g., he is walking (?) the trash bin). We found significant main effects of both Interlocutor and Intention on preposition choice. These findings extend those reported in Liao et al. (2021) Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 35(4), 498–520 in that protagonist intention and interlocutor status were found to indeed affect motion event endpoint description. The current findings furthermore show that grammatical aspect affects people’s sensitivity to these factors, thus also affecting how a motion event endpoint is described. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10129936 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101299362023-04-27 Linguistic and non-linguistic cues in motion event endpoint description: The selection between English to and towards Liao, Yiyun Dijkstra, Katinka Zwaan, Rolf A. Mem Cognit Article The current study aims to explore the factors that could affect people’s description of a motion event endpoint. The study conducted by Liao, Dijkstra, and Zwaan (2021, Language and Cognition, 13[2], 161–190) found that two non-linguistic factors (i.e., the actor’s goal and the interlocutor’s social status) affect people’s choice between two Dutch directional prepositions (i.e., naar and richting) during event description tasks. The current study aims to extend these findings by examining the choice between a similar pair of directional prepositions in English (i.e., to and towards). Moreover, we aim to study whether grammatical aspect (i.e., the English simple present and the English progressive aspect) affects the sensitivity to the two non-linguistic factors and consequently also affects how people describe a motion event endpoint. In Experiment 1, we used the English simple present for all sentence stimuli (e.g., he walks (?) the trash bin). We found a significant effect of Interlocutor (the interlocutor’s social status) on preposition choice, but no significant effect of Intention (the actor’s goal). In Experiment 2, we replaced the English simple present with the English progressive aspect (e.g., he is walking (?) the trash bin). We found significant main effects of both Interlocutor and Intention on preposition choice. These findings extend those reported in Liao et al. (2021) Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 35(4), 498–520 in that protagonist intention and interlocutor status were found to indeed affect motion event endpoint description. The current findings furthermore show that grammatical aspect affects people’s sensitivity to these factors, thus also affecting how a motion event endpoint is described. Springer US 2022-11-16 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10129936/ /pubmed/36385446 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-022-01371-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Liao, Yiyun Dijkstra, Katinka Zwaan, Rolf A. Linguistic and non-linguistic cues in motion event endpoint description: The selection between English to and towards |
title | Linguistic and non-linguistic cues in motion event endpoint description: The selection between English to and towards |
title_full | Linguistic and non-linguistic cues in motion event endpoint description: The selection between English to and towards |
title_fullStr | Linguistic and non-linguistic cues in motion event endpoint description: The selection between English to and towards |
title_full_unstemmed | Linguistic and non-linguistic cues in motion event endpoint description: The selection between English to and towards |
title_short | Linguistic and non-linguistic cues in motion event endpoint description: The selection between English to and towards |
title_sort | linguistic and non-linguistic cues in motion event endpoint description: the selection between english to and towards |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10129936/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36385446 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-022-01371-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liaoyiyun linguisticandnonlinguisticcuesinmotioneventendpointdescriptiontheselectionbetweenenglishtoandtowards AT dijkstrakatinka linguisticandnonlinguisticcuesinmotioneventendpointdescriptiontheselectionbetweenenglishtoandtowards AT zwaanrolfa linguisticandnonlinguisticcuesinmotioneventendpointdescriptiontheselectionbetweenenglishtoandtowards |