Cargando…

Describing current use, barriers, and facilitators of patient portal messaging for research recruitment: Perspectives from study teams and patients at one institution

INTRODUCTION: The electronic health record (EHR) and patient portal are used increasingly for clinical research, including patient portal recruitment messaging (PPRM). Use of PPRM has grown rapidly; however, best practices are still developing. In this study, we examined the use of PPRM at our insti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miller, Hailey N., Lindo, Sierra, Fish, Laura J., Roberts, Jamie, Stover, John, Schwark, Earl H., Eberlein, Nicholas, Mack, Dalia, Falkovic, Margaret, Makarushka, Christina, Chatterjee, Ranee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10130833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37125060
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.522
_version_ 1785031043571515392
author Miller, Hailey N.
Lindo, Sierra
Fish, Laura J.
Roberts, Jamie
Stover, John
Schwark, Earl H.
Eberlein, Nicholas
Mack, Dalia
Falkovic, Margaret
Makarushka, Christina
Chatterjee, Ranee
author_facet Miller, Hailey N.
Lindo, Sierra
Fish, Laura J.
Roberts, Jamie
Stover, John
Schwark, Earl H.
Eberlein, Nicholas
Mack, Dalia
Falkovic, Margaret
Makarushka, Christina
Chatterjee, Ranee
author_sort Miller, Hailey N.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The electronic health record (EHR) and patient portal are used increasingly for clinical research, including patient portal recruitment messaging (PPRM). Use of PPRM has grown rapidly; however, best practices are still developing. In this study, we examined the use of PPRM at our institution and conducted qualitative interviews among study teams and patients to understand experiences and preferences for PPRM. METHODS: We identified study teams that sent PPRMs and patients that received PPRMs in a 60-day period. We characterized these studies and patients, in addition to the patients’ interactions with the PPRMs (e.g., viewed, responded). From these groups, we recruited study team members and patients for semi-structured interviews. A pragmatic qualitative inquiry framework was used by interviewers. Interviews were audio-recorded and analyzed using a rapid qualitative analysis exploratory approach. RESULTS: Across ten studies, 35,037 PPRMs were sent, 33% were viewed, and 17% were responded to. Interaction rates varied across demographic groups. Six study team members completed interviews and described PPRM as an efficient and helpful recruitment method. Twenty-eight patients completed interviews. They were supportive of receiving PPRMs, particularly when the PPRM was relevant to their health. Patients indicated that providing more information in the PPRM would be helpful, in addition to options to set personalized preferences. CONCLUSIONS: PPRM is an efficient recruitment method for study teams and is acceptable to patients. Engagement with PPRMs varies across demographic groups, which should be considered during recruitment planning. Additional research is needed to evaluate and implement recommended changes by study teams and patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10130833
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101308332023-04-27 Describing current use, barriers, and facilitators of patient portal messaging for research recruitment: Perspectives from study teams and patients at one institution Miller, Hailey N. Lindo, Sierra Fish, Laura J. Roberts, Jamie Stover, John Schwark, Earl H. Eberlein, Nicholas Mack, Dalia Falkovic, Margaret Makarushka, Christina Chatterjee, Ranee J Clin Transl Sci Research Article INTRODUCTION: The electronic health record (EHR) and patient portal are used increasingly for clinical research, including patient portal recruitment messaging (PPRM). Use of PPRM has grown rapidly; however, best practices are still developing. In this study, we examined the use of PPRM at our institution and conducted qualitative interviews among study teams and patients to understand experiences and preferences for PPRM. METHODS: We identified study teams that sent PPRMs and patients that received PPRMs in a 60-day period. We characterized these studies and patients, in addition to the patients’ interactions with the PPRMs (e.g., viewed, responded). From these groups, we recruited study team members and patients for semi-structured interviews. A pragmatic qualitative inquiry framework was used by interviewers. Interviews were audio-recorded and analyzed using a rapid qualitative analysis exploratory approach. RESULTS: Across ten studies, 35,037 PPRMs were sent, 33% were viewed, and 17% were responded to. Interaction rates varied across demographic groups. Six study team members completed interviews and described PPRM as an efficient and helpful recruitment method. Twenty-eight patients completed interviews. They were supportive of receiving PPRMs, particularly when the PPRM was relevant to their health. Patients indicated that providing more information in the PPRM would be helpful, in addition to options to set personalized preferences. CONCLUSIONS: PPRM is an efficient recruitment method for study teams and is acceptable to patients. Engagement with PPRMs varies across demographic groups, which should be considered during recruitment planning. Additional research is needed to evaluate and implement recommended changes by study teams and patients. Cambridge University Press 2023-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10130833/ /pubmed/37125060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.522 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Miller, Hailey N.
Lindo, Sierra
Fish, Laura J.
Roberts, Jamie
Stover, John
Schwark, Earl H.
Eberlein, Nicholas
Mack, Dalia
Falkovic, Margaret
Makarushka, Christina
Chatterjee, Ranee
Describing current use, barriers, and facilitators of patient portal messaging for research recruitment: Perspectives from study teams and patients at one institution
title Describing current use, barriers, and facilitators of patient portal messaging for research recruitment: Perspectives from study teams and patients at one institution
title_full Describing current use, barriers, and facilitators of patient portal messaging for research recruitment: Perspectives from study teams and patients at one institution
title_fullStr Describing current use, barriers, and facilitators of patient portal messaging for research recruitment: Perspectives from study teams and patients at one institution
title_full_unstemmed Describing current use, barriers, and facilitators of patient portal messaging for research recruitment: Perspectives from study teams and patients at one institution
title_short Describing current use, barriers, and facilitators of patient portal messaging for research recruitment: Perspectives from study teams and patients at one institution
title_sort describing current use, barriers, and facilitators of patient portal messaging for research recruitment: perspectives from study teams and patients at one institution
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10130833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37125060
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.522
work_keys_str_mv AT millerhaileyn describingcurrentusebarriersandfacilitatorsofpatientportalmessagingforresearchrecruitmentperspectivesfromstudyteamsandpatientsatoneinstitution
AT lindosierra describingcurrentusebarriersandfacilitatorsofpatientportalmessagingforresearchrecruitmentperspectivesfromstudyteamsandpatientsatoneinstitution
AT fishlauraj describingcurrentusebarriersandfacilitatorsofpatientportalmessagingforresearchrecruitmentperspectivesfromstudyteamsandpatientsatoneinstitution
AT robertsjamie describingcurrentusebarriersandfacilitatorsofpatientportalmessagingforresearchrecruitmentperspectivesfromstudyteamsandpatientsatoneinstitution
AT stoverjohn describingcurrentusebarriersandfacilitatorsofpatientportalmessagingforresearchrecruitmentperspectivesfromstudyteamsandpatientsatoneinstitution
AT schwarkearlh describingcurrentusebarriersandfacilitatorsofpatientportalmessagingforresearchrecruitmentperspectivesfromstudyteamsandpatientsatoneinstitution
AT eberleinnicholas describingcurrentusebarriersandfacilitatorsofpatientportalmessagingforresearchrecruitmentperspectivesfromstudyteamsandpatientsatoneinstitution
AT mackdalia describingcurrentusebarriersandfacilitatorsofpatientportalmessagingforresearchrecruitmentperspectivesfromstudyteamsandpatientsatoneinstitution
AT falkovicmargaret describingcurrentusebarriersandfacilitatorsofpatientportalmessagingforresearchrecruitmentperspectivesfromstudyteamsandpatientsatoneinstitution
AT makarushkachristina describingcurrentusebarriersandfacilitatorsofpatientportalmessagingforresearchrecruitmentperspectivesfromstudyteamsandpatientsatoneinstitution
AT chatterjeeranee describingcurrentusebarriersandfacilitatorsofpatientportalmessagingforresearchrecruitmentperspectivesfromstudyteamsandpatientsatoneinstitution