Cargando…
Describing current use, barriers, and facilitators of patient portal messaging for research recruitment: Perspectives from study teams and patients at one institution
INTRODUCTION: The electronic health record (EHR) and patient portal are used increasingly for clinical research, including patient portal recruitment messaging (PPRM). Use of PPRM has grown rapidly; however, best practices are still developing. In this study, we examined the use of PPRM at our insti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10130833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37125060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.522 |
_version_ | 1785031043571515392 |
---|---|
author | Miller, Hailey N. Lindo, Sierra Fish, Laura J. Roberts, Jamie Stover, John Schwark, Earl H. Eberlein, Nicholas Mack, Dalia Falkovic, Margaret Makarushka, Christina Chatterjee, Ranee |
author_facet | Miller, Hailey N. Lindo, Sierra Fish, Laura J. Roberts, Jamie Stover, John Schwark, Earl H. Eberlein, Nicholas Mack, Dalia Falkovic, Margaret Makarushka, Christina Chatterjee, Ranee |
author_sort | Miller, Hailey N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The electronic health record (EHR) and patient portal are used increasingly for clinical research, including patient portal recruitment messaging (PPRM). Use of PPRM has grown rapidly; however, best practices are still developing. In this study, we examined the use of PPRM at our institution and conducted qualitative interviews among study teams and patients to understand experiences and preferences for PPRM. METHODS: We identified study teams that sent PPRMs and patients that received PPRMs in a 60-day period. We characterized these studies and patients, in addition to the patients’ interactions with the PPRMs (e.g., viewed, responded). From these groups, we recruited study team members and patients for semi-structured interviews. A pragmatic qualitative inquiry framework was used by interviewers. Interviews were audio-recorded and analyzed using a rapid qualitative analysis exploratory approach. RESULTS: Across ten studies, 35,037 PPRMs were sent, 33% were viewed, and 17% were responded to. Interaction rates varied across demographic groups. Six study team members completed interviews and described PPRM as an efficient and helpful recruitment method. Twenty-eight patients completed interviews. They were supportive of receiving PPRMs, particularly when the PPRM was relevant to their health. Patients indicated that providing more information in the PPRM would be helpful, in addition to options to set personalized preferences. CONCLUSIONS: PPRM is an efficient recruitment method for study teams and is acceptable to patients. Engagement with PPRMs varies across demographic groups, which should be considered during recruitment planning. Additional research is needed to evaluate and implement recommended changes by study teams and patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10130833 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101308332023-04-27 Describing current use, barriers, and facilitators of patient portal messaging for research recruitment: Perspectives from study teams and patients at one institution Miller, Hailey N. Lindo, Sierra Fish, Laura J. Roberts, Jamie Stover, John Schwark, Earl H. Eberlein, Nicholas Mack, Dalia Falkovic, Margaret Makarushka, Christina Chatterjee, Ranee J Clin Transl Sci Research Article INTRODUCTION: The electronic health record (EHR) and patient portal are used increasingly for clinical research, including patient portal recruitment messaging (PPRM). Use of PPRM has grown rapidly; however, best practices are still developing. In this study, we examined the use of PPRM at our institution and conducted qualitative interviews among study teams and patients to understand experiences and preferences for PPRM. METHODS: We identified study teams that sent PPRMs and patients that received PPRMs in a 60-day period. We characterized these studies and patients, in addition to the patients’ interactions with the PPRMs (e.g., viewed, responded). From these groups, we recruited study team members and patients for semi-structured interviews. A pragmatic qualitative inquiry framework was used by interviewers. Interviews were audio-recorded and analyzed using a rapid qualitative analysis exploratory approach. RESULTS: Across ten studies, 35,037 PPRMs were sent, 33% were viewed, and 17% were responded to. Interaction rates varied across demographic groups. Six study team members completed interviews and described PPRM as an efficient and helpful recruitment method. Twenty-eight patients completed interviews. They were supportive of receiving PPRMs, particularly when the PPRM was relevant to their health. Patients indicated that providing more information in the PPRM would be helpful, in addition to options to set personalized preferences. CONCLUSIONS: PPRM is an efficient recruitment method for study teams and is acceptable to patients. Engagement with PPRMs varies across demographic groups, which should be considered during recruitment planning. Additional research is needed to evaluate and implement recommended changes by study teams and patients. Cambridge University Press 2023-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10130833/ /pubmed/37125060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.522 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Miller, Hailey N. Lindo, Sierra Fish, Laura J. Roberts, Jamie Stover, John Schwark, Earl H. Eberlein, Nicholas Mack, Dalia Falkovic, Margaret Makarushka, Christina Chatterjee, Ranee Describing current use, barriers, and facilitators of patient portal messaging for research recruitment: Perspectives from study teams and patients at one institution |
title | Describing current use, barriers, and facilitators of patient portal messaging for research recruitment: Perspectives from study teams and patients at one institution |
title_full | Describing current use, barriers, and facilitators of patient portal messaging for research recruitment: Perspectives from study teams and patients at one institution |
title_fullStr | Describing current use, barriers, and facilitators of patient portal messaging for research recruitment: Perspectives from study teams and patients at one institution |
title_full_unstemmed | Describing current use, barriers, and facilitators of patient portal messaging for research recruitment: Perspectives from study teams and patients at one institution |
title_short | Describing current use, barriers, and facilitators of patient portal messaging for research recruitment: Perspectives from study teams and patients at one institution |
title_sort | describing current use, barriers, and facilitators of patient portal messaging for research recruitment: perspectives from study teams and patients at one institution |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10130833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37125060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.522 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT millerhaileyn describingcurrentusebarriersandfacilitatorsofpatientportalmessagingforresearchrecruitmentperspectivesfromstudyteamsandpatientsatoneinstitution AT lindosierra describingcurrentusebarriersandfacilitatorsofpatientportalmessagingforresearchrecruitmentperspectivesfromstudyteamsandpatientsatoneinstitution AT fishlauraj describingcurrentusebarriersandfacilitatorsofpatientportalmessagingforresearchrecruitmentperspectivesfromstudyteamsandpatientsatoneinstitution AT robertsjamie describingcurrentusebarriersandfacilitatorsofpatientportalmessagingforresearchrecruitmentperspectivesfromstudyteamsandpatientsatoneinstitution AT stoverjohn describingcurrentusebarriersandfacilitatorsofpatientportalmessagingforresearchrecruitmentperspectivesfromstudyteamsandpatientsatoneinstitution AT schwarkearlh describingcurrentusebarriersandfacilitatorsofpatientportalmessagingforresearchrecruitmentperspectivesfromstudyteamsandpatientsatoneinstitution AT eberleinnicholas describingcurrentusebarriersandfacilitatorsofpatientportalmessagingforresearchrecruitmentperspectivesfromstudyteamsandpatientsatoneinstitution AT mackdalia describingcurrentusebarriersandfacilitatorsofpatientportalmessagingforresearchrecruitmentperspectivesfromstudyteamsandpatientsatoneinstitution AT falkovicmargaret describingcurrentusebarriersandfacilitatorsofpatientportalmessagingforresearchrecruitmentperspectivesfromstudyteamsandpatientsatoneinstitution AT makarushkachristina describingcurrentusebarriersandfacilitatorsofpatientportalmessagingforresearchrecruitmentperspectivesfromstudyteamsandpatientsatoneinstitution AT chatterjeeranee describingcurrentusebarriersandfacilitatorsofpatientportalmessagingforresearchrecruitmentperspectivesfromstudyteamsandpatientsatoneinstitution |