Cargando…
Scientific Journals Should Encourage, Not Hinder, Debates About Their Published Papers
The revolution in electronic publishing now allows for papers to be continuously critiqued through letters to the editor, online comments, tweets and other means. However, established top-ranked journals still pose serious barriers regarding cultivation, documentation and dissemination of post publi...
Autor principal: | Diamandis, Eleftherios P. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Communications and Publications Division (CPD) of the IFCC
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10131242/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37124652 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The democratization of scientific publishing
por: Fiala, Clare, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Academic Debate: Publications Which Promote Political Agendas Have no Place in Scientific and Medical Journals, and Academics Should Refrain from Publishing in Such Journals
por: Glick, Shimon, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Inconsistencies in the sensitivity and specificity values in an Review Paper published in the Journal of Clinical Hypertension
por: Ortiz, Michael S.
Publicado: (2021) -
Ethics in scientific research and in the publishing of papers in biomedical journals
por: Miziara, Ivan D., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Vacant Appointments : Should Canvassing Be Encouraged or Forbidden?
Publicado: (1914)