Cargando…

First trimester abortion protocols by facility type in Switzerland and potential barriers to accessing the service

Simplified first-trimester abortion protocols are well established. However, data on the use of medical or surgical abortion protocols across Switzerland is lacking. We report protocol characteristics in abortion care for two different facility types, hospital vs private practices (office-based) in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eckstein, Samuel Martin, von Felten, Stefanie, Perotto, Laura, Brun, Romana, Vorburger, Denise
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10131519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37100827
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-34101-2
_version_ 1785031194600013824
author Eckstein, Samuel Martin
von Felten, Stefanie
Perotto, Laura
Brun, Romana
Vorburger, Denise
author_facet Eckstein, Samuel Martin
von Felten, Stefanie
Perotto, Laura
Brun, Romana
Vorburger, Denise
author_sort Eckstein, Samuel Martin
collection PubMed
description Simplified first-trimester abortion protocols are well established. However, data on the use of medical or surgical abortion protocols across Switzerland is lacking. We report protocol characteristics in abortion care for two different facility types, hospital vs private practices (office-based) in Switzerland. Furthermore, we investigate an association between protocol characteristics and the likelihood of following through with the abortion at the same facility. We also report abortion outcomes of an office-based cohort where doctors use simplified abortion protocols. This study consists of two parts. (i) Between April and July, 2019, we collected data regarding medical and surgical abortion protocols of institutions offering abortions, in a nationwide survey. We assessed whether the proportion of patients who followed through with the abortion (primary outcome) after first appointment was associated with predefined protocol characteristics, considered to complicate access to abortion services, using generalised estimating equations. (ii) We analysed abortion outcomes of six selected office-based facilities from January, 2008, to December, 2018, using simplified abortion protocols in accordance with the Worlds Health Organisation (WHO) guidelines. (i) We included a total of 39 institutions. Hospitals showed more protocol-based barriers to abortion access compared with office-based facilities. The odds of undergoing an abortion after the first appointment were increased using protocols with minimal barriers. Overall, office-based facilities applied higher gestational age limits, required fewer appointments, and administered mifepristone more often after the first visit than did hospitals. (ii) We included a total of 5274 patients with an incidence of complications requiring surgery of 2.5% in line with rates reported in published literature. Only a few hospitals provide abortion care with easy access to medical and surgical abortion, whereas most office-based facilities do. Access to abortion services is generally crucial, and should be provided in a single visit whenever clinically permissible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10131519
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101315192023-04-27 First trimester abortion protocols by facility type in Switzerland and potential barriers to accessing the service Eckstein, Samuel Martin von Felten, Stefanie Perotto, Laura Brun, Romana Vorburger, Denise Sci Rep Article Simplified first-trimester abortion protocols are well established. However, data on the use of medical or surgical abortion protocols across Switzerland is lacking. We report protocol characteristics in abortion care for two different facility types, hospital vs private practices (office-based) in Switzerland. Furthermore, we investigate an association between protocol characteristics and the likelihood of following through with the abortion at the same facility. We also report abortion outcomes of an office-based cohort where doctors use simplified abortion protocols. This study consists of two parts. (i) Between April and July, 2019, we collected data regarding medical and surgical abortion protocols of institutions offering abortions, in a nationwide survey. We assessed whether the proportion of patients who followed through with the abortion (primary outcome) after first appointment was associated with predefined protocol characteristics, considered to complicate access to abortion services, using generalised estimating equations. (ii) We analysed abortion outcomes of six selected office-based facilities from January, 2008, to December, 2018, using simplified abortion protocols in accordance with the Worlds Health Organisation (WHO) guidelines. (i) We included a total of 39 institutions. Hospitals showed more protocol-based barriers to abortion access compared with office-based facilities. The odds of undergoing an abortion after the first appointment were increased using protocols with minimal barriers. Overall, office-based facilities applied higher gestational age limits, required fewer appointments, and administered mifepristone more often after the first visit than did hospitals. (ii) We included a total of 5274 patients with an incidence of complications requiring surgery of 2.5% in line with rates reported in published literature. Only a few hospitals provide abortion care with easy access to medical and surgical abortion, whereas most office-based facilities do. Access to abortion services is generally crucial, and should be provided in a single visit whenever clinically permissible. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10131519/ /pubmed/37100827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-34101-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Eckstein, Samuel Martin
von Felten, Stefanie
Perotto, Laura
Brun, Romana
Vorburger, Denise
First trimester abortion protocols by facility type in Switzerland and potential barriers to accessing the service
title First trimester abortion protocols by facility type in Switzerland and potential barriers to accessing the service
title_full First trimester abortion protocols by facility type in Switzerland and potential barriers to accessing the service
title_fullStr First trimester abortion protocols by facility type in Switzerland and potential barriers to accessing the service
title_full_unstemmed First trimester abortion protocols by facility type in Switzerland and potential barriers to accessing the service
title_short First trimester abortion protocols by facility type in Switzerland and potential barriers to accessing the service
title_sort first trimester abortion protocols by facility type in switzerland and potential barriers to accessing the service
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10131519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37100827
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-34101-2
work_keys_str_mv AT ecksteinsamuelmartin firsttrimesterabortionprotocolsbyfacilitytypeinswitzerlandandpotentialbarrierstoaccessingtheservice
AT vonfeltenstefanie firsttrimesterabortionprotocolsbyfacilitytypeinswitzerlandandpotentialbarrierstoaccessingtheservice
AT perottolaura firsttrimesterabortionprotocolsbyfacilitytypeinswitzerlandandpotentialbarrierstoaccessingtheservice
AT brunromana firsttrimesterabortionprotocolsbyfacilitytypeinswitzerlandandpotentialbarrierstoaccessingtheservice
AT vorburgerdenise firsttrimesterabortionprotocolsbyfacilitytypeinswitzerlandandpotentialbarrierstoaccessingtheservice