Cargando…

Comparative Performance Evaluation of the Public Health Surveillance Systems in 6 Gulf Cooperation Countries: Cross-sectional Study

BACKGROUND: Evaluating public health surveillance systems is important to ensure that events of public health importance are appropriately monitored. Evaluation studies based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines have been used to appraise surveillance systems globally....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Albali, Nawaf, Almudarra, Sami, Al-Farsi, Yahya, Alarifi, Abdullah, Al Wahaibi, Adil, Penttinen, Pasi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10131602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37018033
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/41269
_version_ 1785031212492914688
author Albali, Nawaf
Almudarra, Sami
Al-Farsi, Yahya
Alarifi, Abdullah
Al Wahaibi, Adil
Penttinen, Pasi
author_facet Albali, Nawaf
Almudarra, Sami
Al-Farsi, Yahya
Alarifi, Abdullah
Al Wahaibi, Adil
Penttinen, Pasi
author_sort Albali, Nawaf
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evaluating public health surveillance systems is important to ensure that events of public health importance are appropriately monitored. Evaluation studies based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines have been used to appraise surveillance systems globally. Previous evaluation studies undertaken in member countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) were limited to specific illnesses within a single nation. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate public health surveillance systems in GCC countries using CDC guidelines and recommend necessary improvements to enhance these systems. METHODS: The CDC guidelines were used for evaluating the surveillance systems in GCC countries. A total of 6 representatives from GCC countries were asked to rate 43 indicators across the systems’ level of usefulness, simplicity, flexibility, acceptability, sensitivity, predictive value positive, representativeness, data quality, stability, and timeliness. Descriptive data analysis and univariate linear regression analysis were performed. RESULTS: All surveillance systems in the GCC covered communicable diseases, and approximately two-thirds (4/6, 67%, 95% CI 29.9%-90.3%) of them covered health care–associated infections. The mean global score was 147 (SD 13.27). The United Arab Emirates scored the highest in the global score with a rating of 167 (83.5%, 95% CI 77.7%-88.0%), and Oman obtained the highest scores for usefulness, simplicity, and flexibility. Strong correlations were observed between the global score and the level of usefulness, flexibility, acceptability, representativeness, and timeliness, and a negative correlation was observed between stability and timeliness score. Disease coverage was the most substantial predictor of the GCC surveillance global score. CONCLUSIONS: GCC surveillance systems are performing optimally and have shown beneficial outcomes. GCC countries must use the lessons learned from the success of the systems of the United Arab Emirates and Oman. To maintain GCC surveillance systems so that they are viable and adaptable to future potential health risks, measures including centralized information exchange, deployment of emerging technologies, and system architecture reform are necessary.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10131602
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101316022023-04-27 Comparative Performance Evaluation of the Public Health Surveillance Systems in 6 Gulf Cooperation Countries: Cross-sectional Study Albali, Nawaf Almudarra, Sami Al-Farsi, Yahya Alarifi, Abdullah Al Wahaibi, Adil Penttinen, Pasi JMIR Form Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Evaluating public health surveillance systems is important to ensure that events of public health importance are appropriately monitored. Evaluation studies based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines have been used to appraise surveillance systems globally. Previous evaluation studies undertaken in member countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) were limited to specific illnesses within a single nation. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate public health surveillance systems in GCC countries using CDC guidelines and recommend necessary improvements to enhance these systems. METHODS: The CDC guidelines were used for evaluating the surveillance systems in GCC countries. A total of 6 representatives from GCC countries were asked to rate 43 indicators across the systems’ level of usefulness, simplicity, flexibility, acceptability, sensitivity, predictive value positive, representativeness, data quality, stability, and timeliness. Descriptive data analysis and univariate linear regression analysis were performed. RESULTS: All surveillance systems in the GCC covered communicable diseases, and approximately two-thirds (4/6, 67%, 95% CI 29.9%-90.3%) of them covered health care–associated infections. The mean global score was 147 (SD 13.27). The United Arab Emirates scored the highest in the global score with a rating of 167 (83.5%, 95% CI 77.7%-88.0%), and Oman obtained the highest scores for usefulness, simplicity, and flexibility. Strong correlations were observed between the global score and the level of usefulness, flexibility, acceptability, representativeness, and timeliness, and a negative correlation was observed between stability and timeliness score. Disease coverage was the most substantial predictor of the GCC surveillance global score. CONCLUSIONS: GCC surveillance systems are performing optimally and have shown beneficial outcomes. GCC countries must use the lessons learned from the success of the systems of the United Arab Emirates and Oman. To maintain GCC surveillance systems so that they are viable and adaptable to future potential health risks, measures including centralized information exchange, deployment of emerging technologies, and system architecture reform are necessary. JMIR Publications 2023-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10131602/ /pubmed/37018033 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/41269 Text en ©Nawaf Albali, Sami Almudarra, Yahya Al-Farsi, Abdullah Alarifi, Adil Al Wahaibi, Pasi Penttinen. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 05.04.2023. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Formative Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://formative.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Albali, Nawaf
Almudarra, Sami
Al-Farsi, Yahya
Alarifi, Abdullah
Al Wahaibi, Adil
Penttinen, Pasi
Comparative Performance Evaluation of the Public Health Surveillance Systems in 6 Gulf Cooperation Countries: Cross-sectional Study
title Comparative Performance Evaluation of the Public Health Surveillance Systems in 6 Gulf Cooperation Countries: Cross-sectional Study
title_full Comparative Performance Evaluation of the Public Health Surveillance Systems in 6 Gulf Cooperation Countries: Cross-sectional Study
title_fullStr Comparative Performance Evaluation of the Public Health Surveillance Systems in 6 Gulf Cooperation Countries: Cross-sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Performance Evaluation of the Public Health Surveillance Systems in 6 Gulf Cooperation Countries: Cross-sectional Study
title_short Comparative Performance Evaluation of the Public Health Surveillance Systems in 6 Gulf Cooperation Countries: Cross-sectional Study
title_sort comparative performance evaluation of the public health surveillance systems in 6 gulf cooperation countries: cross-sectional study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10131602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37018033
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/41269
work_keys_str_mv AT albalinawaf comparativeperformanceevaluationofthepublichealthsurveillancesystemsin6gulfcooperationcountriescrosssectionalstudy
AT almudarrasami comparativeperformanceevaluationofthepublichealthsurveillancesystemsin6gulfcooperationcountriescrosssectionalstudy
AT alfarsiyahya comparativeperformanceevaluationofthepublichealthsurveillancesystemsin6gulfcooperationcountriescrosssectionalstudy
AT alarifiabdullah comparativeperformanceevaluationofthepublichealthsurveillancesystemsin6gulfcooperationcountriescrosssectionalstudy
AT alwahaibiadil comparativeperformanceevaluationofthepublichealthsurveillancesystemsin6gulfcooperationcountriescrosssectionalstudy
AT penttinenpasi comparativeperformanceevaluationofthepublichealthsurveillancesystemsin6gulfcooperationcountriescrosssectionalstudy