Cargando…

Patient Satisfaction With Speech Recognition in the Exam Room: Exploratory Survey

BACKGROUND: Medical speech recognition technology uses a microphone and computer software to transcribe the spoken word into text and is not typically used in outpatient clinical exam rooms. Patient perceptions regarding speech recognition in the exam room (SRIER) are therefore unknown. OBJECTIVE: T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sippel, Jeffrey, Podhajsky, Tim, Lin, Chen-Tan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10131698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37018039
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/42739
_version_ 1785031232336166912
author Sippel, Jeffrey
Podhajsky, Tim
Lin, Chen-Tan
author_facet Sippel, Jeffrey
Podhajsky, Tim
Lin, Chen-Tan
author_sort Sippel, Jeffrey
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Medical speech recognition technology uses a microphone and computer software to transcribe the spoken word into text and is not typically used in outpatient clinical exam rooms. Patient perceptions regarding speech recognition in the exam room (SRIER) are therefore unknown. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to characterize patient perceptions of SRIER by administering a survey to consecutive patients scheduled for acute, chronic, and wellness care in three outpatient clinic sites. METHODS: We used a microphone and medical speech recognition software to complete the “assessment and plan” portion of the after-visit summary in the patient’s presence, immediately printed the after-visit summary, and then administered a 4-question exploratory survey to 65 consecutive patients in internal medicine and pulmonary medicine clinics at an academic medical center and a community family practice clinic in 2021 to characterize patient perceptions of SRIER. All questions were completed by all participants. RESULTS: When compared to patients’ recollection of usual care (visits with no microphone and an after-visit summary without an “assessment and plan”), 86% (n=56) of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that their provider addressed their concerns better, and 73% (n=48) agreed or strongly agreed that they understood their provider’s advice better. A total of 99% (n=64) of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that a printed after-visit summary including the “assessment and plan” was helpful. By comparing the “agree” and “strongly agree” responses to the neutral responses, we found that patients felt that clinicians using SRIER addressed their concerns better (P<.001), they understood their clinician’s advice better (P<.001), and receiving a paper summary was helpful (P<.001). Patients were likely to recommend a provider using a microphone based on the Net Promoter Score of 58. CONCLUSIONS: This survey suggests patients have a very positive perception of speech recognition use in the exam room.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10131698
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101316982023-04-27 Patient Satisfaction With Speech Recognition in the Exam Room: Exploratory Survey Sippel, Jeffrey Podhajsky, Tim Lin, Chen-Tan JMIR Hum Factors Original Paper BACKGROUND: Medical speech recognition technology uses a microphone and computer software to transcribe the spoken word into text and is not typically used in outpatient clinical exam rooms. Patient perceptions regarding speech recognition in the exam room (SRIER) are therefore unknown. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to characterize patient perceptions of SRIER by administering a survey to consecutive patients scheduled for acute, chronic, and wellness care in three outpatient clinic sites. METHODS: We used a microphone and medical speech recognition software to complete the “assessment and plan” portion of the after-visit summary in the patient’s presence, immediately printed the after-visit summary, and then administered a 4-question exploratory survey to 65 consecutive patients in internal medicine and pulmonary medicine clinics at an academic medical center and a community family practice clinic in 2021 to characterize patient perceptions of SRIER. All questions were completed by all participants. RESULTS: When compared to patients’ recollection of usual care (visits with no microphone and an after-visit summary without an “assessment and plan”), 86% (n=56) of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that their provider addressed their concerns better, and 73% (n=48) agreed or strongly agreed that they understood their provider’s advice better. A total of 99% (n=64) of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that a printed after-visit summary including the “assessment and plan” was helpful. By comparing the “agree” and “strongly agree” responses to the neutral responses, we found that patients felt that clinicians using SRIER addressed their concerns better (P<.001), they understood their clinician’s advice better (P<.001), and receiving a paper summary was helpful (P<.001). Patients were likely to recommend a provider using a microphone based on the Net Promoter Score of 58. CONCLUSIONS: This survey suggests patients have a very positive perception of speech recognition use in the exam room. JMIR Publications 2023-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10131698/ /pubmed/37018039 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/42739 Text en ©Jeffrey Sippel, Tim Podhajsky, Chen-Tan Lin. Originally published in JMIR Human Factors (https://humanfactors.jmir.org), 05.04.2023. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Human Factors, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://humanfactors.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Sippel, Jeffrey
Podhajsky, Tim
Lin, Chen-Tan
Patient Satisfaction With Speech Recognition in the Exam Room: Exploratory Survey
title Patient Satisfaction With Speech Recognition in the Exam Room: Exploratory Survey
title_full Patient Satisfaction With Speech Recognition in the Exam Room: Exploratory Survey
title_fullStr Patient Satisfaction With Speech Recognition in the Exam Room: Exploratory Survey
title_full_unstemmed Patient Satisfaction With Speech Recognition in the Exam Room: Exploratory Survey
title_short Patient Satisfaction With Speech Recognition in the Exam Room: Exploratory Survey
title_sort patient satisfaction with speech recognition in the exam room: exploratory survey
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10131698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37018039
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/42739
work_keys_str_mv AT sippeljeffrey patientsatisfactionwithspeechrecognitionintheexamroomexploratorysurvey
AT podhajskytim patientsatisfactionwithspeechrecognitionintheexamroomexploratorysurvey
AT linchentan patientsatisfactionwithspeechrecognitionintheexamroomexploratorysurvey