Cargando…

Disparity in Lung Cancer Screening Among Smokers and Nonsmokers in China: Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND: Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening is effective in reducing lung cancer mortality in smokers; however, the evidence in nonsmokers is scarce. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the participant rate and effectiveness of one-off LDCT screening for lung cancer among smokers a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Le, Wang, Youqing, Wang, Fei, Gao, Yumeng, Fang, Zhimei, Gong, Weiwei, Li, Huizhang, Zhu, Chen, Chen, Yaoyao, Shi, Lei, Du, Lingbin, Li, Ni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10131892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36917151
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/43586
_version_ 1785031278444150784
author Wang, Le
Wang, Youqing
Wang, Fei
Gao, Yumeng
Fang, Zhimei
Gong, Weiwei
Li, Huizhang
Zhu, Chen
Chen, Yaoyao
Shi, Lei
Du, Lingbin
Li, Ni
author_facet Wang, Le
Wang, Youqing
Wang, Fei
Gao, Yumeng
Fang, Zhimei
Gong, Weiwei
Li, Huizhang
Zhu, Chen
Chen, Yaoyao
Shi, Lei
Du, Lingbin
Li, Ni
author_sort Wang, Le
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening is effective in reducing lung cancer mortality in smokers; however, the evidence in nonsmokers is scarce. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the participant rate and effectiveness of one-off LDCT screening for lung cancer among smokers and nonsmokers. METHODS: A population-based prospective cohort study was performed to enroll participants aged between 40 and 74 years from 2013 to 2019 from 4 cities in Zhejiang Province, China. Participants who were evaluated as having a high risk of lung cancer from an established risk score model were recommended to undergo LDCT screening. Follow-up outcomes were retrieved on June 30, 2020. The uptake rate of LDCT screening for evaluated high-risk participants and the detection rate of early-stage lung cancer (stage 0-I) were calculated. The lung cancer incidence, lung cancer mortality, and all-cause mortality were compared between the screened and nonscreened groups. RESULTS: At baseline, 62.56% (18,818/30,079) of smokers and 6% (5483/91,455) of nonsmokers were identified as high risk (P<.001), of whom 41.9% (7885/18,818) and 66.31% (3636/5483) underwent LDCT screening (P<.001), respectively. After a median follow-up of 5.1 years, 1100 lung cancer cases and 456 all-cause death cases (116 lung cancer death cases) were traced. The proportion of early-stage lung cancer among smokers was 60.3% (173/287), which was lower than the proportion of 80.3% (476/593) among nonsmokers (P<.001). Among smokers, a higher proportion was found in the screened group (72/106, 67.9%) than the nonscreened group (56/114, 49.1%; P=.005), whereas no significance was found (42/44, 96% vs 10/12, 83%; P=.20) among nonsmokers. Compared with participants who were not screened, LDCT screening in smokers significantly increased lung cancer incidence (hazard ratio [HR] 1.39, 95% CI 1.09-1.76; P=.007) but reduced lung cancer mortality (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.28-0.96; P=.04) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.32-0.69; P<.001). Among nonsmokers, no significant results were found for lung cancer incidence (P=.06), all-cause mortality (P=.89), and lung cancer mortality (P=.17). CONCLUSIONS: LDCT screening effectively reduces lung cancer and all-cause mortality among high-risk smokers. Further efforts to define high-risk populations and explore adequate lung cancer screening modalities for nonsmokers are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10131892
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101318922023-04-27 Disparity in Lung Cancer Screening Among Smokers and Nonsmokers in China: Prospective Cohort Study Wang, Le Wang, Youqing Wang, Fei Gao, Yumeng Fang, Zhimei Gong, Weiwei Li, Huizhang Zhu, Chen Chen, Yaoyao Shi, Lei Du, Lingbin Li, Ni JMIR Public Health Surveill Original Paper BACKGROUND: Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening is effective in reducing lung cancer mortality in smokers; however, the evidence in nonsmokers is scarce. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the participant rate and effectiveness of one-off LDCT screening for lung cancer among smokers and nonsmokers. METHODS: A population-based prospective cohort study was performed to enroll participants aged between 40 and 74 years from 2013 to 2019 from 4 cities in Zhejiang Province, China. Participants who were evaluated as having a high risk of lung cancer from an established risk score model were recommended to undergo LDCT screening. Follow-up outcomes were retrieved on June 30, 2020. The uptake rate of LDCT screening for evaluated high-risk participants and the detection rate of early-stage lung cancer (stage 0-I) were calculated. The lung cancer incidence, lung cancer mortality, and all-cause mortality were compared between the screened and nonscreened groups. RESULTS: At baseline, 62.56% (18,818/30,079) of smokers and 6% (5483/91,455) of nonsmokers were identified as high risk (P<.001), of whom 41.9% (7885/18,818) and 66.31% (3636/5483) underwent LDCT screening (P<.001), respectively. After a median follow-up of 5.1 years, 1100 lung cancer cases and 456 all-cause death cases (116 lung cancer death cases) were traced. The proportion of early-stage lung cancer among smokers was 60.3% (173/287), which was lower than the proportion of 80.3% (476/593) among nonsmokers (P<.001). Among smokers, a higher proportion was found in the screened group (72/106, 67.9%) than the nonscreened group (56/114, 49.1%; P=.005), whereas no significance was found (42/44, 96% vs 10/12, 83%; P=.20) among nonsmokers. Compared with participants who were not screened, LDCT screening in smokers significantly increased lung cancer incidence (hazard ratio [HR] 1.39, 95% CI 1.09-1.76; P=.007) but reduced lung cancer mortality (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.28-0.96; P=.04) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.32-0.69; P<.001). Among nonsmokers, no significant results were found for lung cancer incidence (P=.06), all-cause mortality (P=.89), and lung cancer mortality (P=.17). CONCLUSIONS: LDCT screening effectively reduces lung cancer and all-cause mortality among high-risk smokers. Further efforts to define high-risk populations and explore adequate lung cancer screening modalities for nonsmokers are needed. JMIR Publications 2023-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10131892/ /pubmed/36917151 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/43586 Text en ©Le Wang, Youqing Wang, Fei Wang, Yumeng Gao, Zhimei Fang, Weiwei Gong, Huizhang Li, Chen Zhu, Yaoyao Chen, Lei Shi, Lingbin Du, Ni Li. Originally published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance (https://publichealth.jmir.org), 14.03.2023. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://publichealth.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Wang, Le
Wang, Youqing
Wang, Fei
Gao, Yumeng
Fang, Zhimei
Gong, Weiwei
Li, Huizhang
Zhu, Chen
Chen, Yaoyao
Shi, Lei
Du, Lingbin
Li, Ni
Disparity in Lung Cancer Screening Among Smokers and Nonsmokers in China: Prospective Cohort Study
title Disparity in Lung Cancer Screening Among Smokers and Nonsmokers in China: Prospective Cohort Study
title_full Disparity in Lung Cancer Screening Among Smokers and Nonsmokers in China: Prospective Cohort Study
title_fullStr Disparity in Lung Cancer Screening Among Smokers and Nonsmokers in China: Prospective Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Disparity in Lung Cancer Screening Among Smokers and Nonsmokers in China: Prospective Cohort Study
title_short Disparity in Lung Cancer Screening Among Smokers and Nonsmokers in China: Prospective Cohort Study
title_sort disparity in lung cancer screening among smokers and nonsmokers in china: prospective cohort study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10131892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36917151
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/43586
work_keys_str_mv AT wangle disparityinlungcancerscreeningamongsmokersandnonsmokersinchinaprospectivecohortstudy
AT wangyouqing disparityinlungcancerscreeningamongsmokersandnonsmokersinchinaprospectivecohortstudy
AT wangfei disparityinlungcancerscreeningamongsmokersandnonsmokersinchinaprospectivecohortstudy
AT gaoyumeng disparityinlungcancerscreeningamongsmokersandnonsmokersinchinaprospectivecohortstudy
AT fangzhimei disparityinlungcancerscreeningamongsmokersandnonsmokersinchinaprospectivecohortstudy
AT gongweiwei disparityinlungcancerscreeningamongsmokersandnonsmokersinchinaprospectivecohortstudy
AT lihuizhang disparityinlungcancerscreeningamongsmokersandnonsmokersinchinaprospectivecohortstudy
AT zhuchen disparityinlungcancerscreeningamongsmokersandnonsmokersinchinaprospectivecohortstudy
AT chenyaoyao disparityinlungcancerscreeningamongsmokersandnonsmokersinchinaprospectivecohortstudy
AT shilei disparityinlungcancerscreeningamongsmokersandnonsmokersinchinaprospectivecohortstudy
AT dulingbin disparityinlungcancerscreeningamongsmokersandnonsmokersinchinaprospectivecohortstudy
AT lini disparityinlungcancerscreeningamongsmokersandnonsmokersinchinaprospectivecohortstudy