Cargando…
Disparity in Lung Cancer Screening Among Smokers and Nonsmokers in China: Prospective Cohort Study
BACKGROUND: Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening is effective in reducing lung cancer mortality in smokers; however, the evidence in nonsmokers is scarce. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the participant rate and effectiveness of one-off LDCT screening for lung cancer among smokers a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10131892/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36917151 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/43586 |
_version_ | 1785031278444150784 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Le Wang, Youqing Wang, Fei Gao, Yumeng Fang, Zhimei Gong, Weiwei Li, Huizhang Zhu, Chen Chen, Yaoyao Shi, Lei Du, Lingbin Li, Ni |
author_facet | Wang, Le Wang, Youqing Wang, Fei Gao, Yumeng Fang, Zhimei Gong, Weiwei Li, Huizhang Zhu, Chen Chen, Yaoyao Shi, Lei Du, Lingbin Li, Ni |
author_sort | Wang, Le |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening is effective in reducing lung cancer mortality in smokers; however, the evidence in nonsmokers is scarce. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the participant rate and effectiveness of one-off LDCT screening for lung cancer among smokers and nonsmokers. METHODS: A population-based prospective cohort study was performed to enroll participants aged between 40 and 74 years from 2013 to 2019 from 4 cities in Zhejiang Province, China. Participants who were evaluated as having a high risk of lung cancer from an established risk score model were recommended to undergo LDCT screening. Follow-up outcomes were retrieved on June 30, 2020. The uptake rate of LDCT screening for evaluated high-risk participants and the detection rate of early-stage lung cancer (stage 0-I) were calculated. The lung cancer incidence, lung cancer mortality, and all-cause mortality were compared between the screened and nonscreened groups. RESULTS: At baseline, 62.56% (18,818/30,079) of smokers and 6% (5483/91,455) of nonsmokers were identified as high risk (P<.001), of whom 41.9% (7885/18,818) and 66.31% (3636/5483) underwent LDCT screening (P<.001), respectively. After a median follow-up of 5.1 years, 1100 lung cancer cases and 456 all-cause death cases (116 lung cancer death cases) were traced. The proportion of early-stage lung cancer among smokers was 60.3% (173/287), which was lower than the proportion of 80.3% (476/593) among nonsmokers (P<.001). Among smokers, a higher proportion was found in the screened group (72/106, 67.9%) than the nonscreened group (56/114, 49.1%; P=.005), whereas no significance was found (42/44, 96% vs 10/12, 83%; P=.20) among nonsmokers. Compared with participants who were not screened, LDCT screening in smokers significantly increased lung cancer incidence (hazard ratio [HR] 1.39, 95% CI 1.09-1.76; P=.007) but reduced lung cancer mortality (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.28-0.96; P=.04) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.32-0.69; P<.001). Among nonsmokers, no significant results were found for lung cancer incidence (P=.06), all-cause mortality (P=.89), and lung cancer mortality (P=.17). CONCLUSIONS: LDCT screening effectively reduces lung cancer and all-cause mortality among high-risk smokers. Further efforts to define high-risk populations and explore adequate lung cancer screening modalities for nonsmokers are needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10131892 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101318922023-04-27 Disparity in Lung Cancer Screening Among Smokers and Nonsmokers in China: Prospective Cohort Study Wang, Le Wang, Youqing Wang, Fei Gao, Yumeng Fang, Zhimei Gong, Weiwei Li, Huizhang Zhu, Chen Chen, Yaoyao Shi, Lei Du, Lingbin Li, Ni JMIR Public Health Surveill Original Paper BACKGROUND: Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening is effective in reducing lung cancer mortality in smokers; however, the evidence in nonsmokers is scarce. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the participant rate and effectiveness of one-off LDCT screening for lung cancer among smokers and nonsmokers. METHODS: A population-based prospective cohort study was performed to enroll participants aged between 40 and 74 years from 2013 to 2019 from 4 cities in Zhejiang Province, China. Participants who were evaluated as having a high risk of lung cancer from an established risk score model were recommended to undergo LDCT screening. Follow-up outcomes were retrieved on June 30, 2020. The uptake rate of LDCT screening for evaluated high-risk participants and the detection rate of early-stage lung cancer (stage 0-I) were calculated. The lung cancer incidence, lung cancer mortality, and all-cause mortality were compared between the screened and nonscreened groups. RESULTS: At baseline, 62.56% (18,818/30,079) of smokers and 6% (5483/91,455) of nonsmokers were identified as high risk (P<.001), of whom 41.9% (7885/18,818) and 66.31% (3636/5483) underwent LDCT screening (P<.001), respectively. After a median follow-up of 5.1 years, 1100 lung cancer cases and 456 all-cause death cases (116 lung cancer death cases) were traced. The proportion of early-stage lung cancer among smokers was 60.3% (173/287), which was lower than the proportion of 80.3% (476/593) among nonsmokers (P<.001). Among smokers, a higher proportion was found in the screened group (72/106, 67.9%) than the nonscreened group (56/114, 49.1%; P=.005), whereas no significance was found (42/44, 96% vs 10/12, 83%; P=.20) among nonsmokers. Compared with participants who were not screened, LDCT screening in smokers significantly increased lung cancer incidence (hazard ratio [HR] 1.39, 95% CI 1.09-1.76; P=.007) but reduced lung cancer mortality (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.28-0.96; P=.04) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.32-0.69; P<.001). Among nonsmokers, no significant results were found for lung cancer incidence (P=.06), all-cause mortality (P=.89), and lung cancer mortality (P=.17). CONCLUSIONS: LDCT screening effectively reduces lung cancer and all-cause mortality among high-risk smokers. Further efforts to define high-risk populations and explore adequate lung cancer screening modalities for nonsmokers are needed. JMIR Publications 2023-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10131892/ /pubmed/36917151 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/43586 Text en ©Le Wang, Youqing Wang, Fei Wang, Yumeng Gao, Zhimei Fang, Weiwei Gong, Huizhang Li, Chen Zhu, Yaoyao Chen, Lei Shi, Lingbin Du, Ni Li. Originally published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance (https://publichealth.jmir.org), 14.03.2023. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://publichealth.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Wang, Le Wang, Youqing Wang, Fei Gao, Yumeng Fang, Zhimei Gong, Weiwei Li, Huizhang Zhu, Chen Chen, Yaoyao Shi, Lei Du, Lingbin Li, Ni Disparity in Lung Cancer Screening Among Smokers and Nonsmokers in China: Prospective Cohort Study |
title | Disparity in Lung Cancer Screening Among Smokers and Nonsmokers in China: Prospective Cohort Study |
title_full | Disparity in Lung Cancer Screening Among Smokers and Nonsmokers in China: Prospective Cohort Study |
title_fullStr | Disparity in Lung Cancer Screening Among Smokers and Nonsmokers in China: Prospective Cohort Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Disparity in Lung Cancer Screening Among Smokers and Nonsmokers in China: Prospective Cohort Study |
title_short | Disparity in Lung Cancer Screening Among Smokers and Nonsmokers in China: Prospective Cohort Study |
title_sort | disparity in lung cancer screening among smokers and nonsmokers in china: prospective cohort study |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10131892/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36917151 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/43586 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangle disparityinlungcancerscreeningamongsmokersandnonsmokersinchinaprospectivecohortstudy AT wangyouqing disparityinlungcancerscreeningamongsmokersandnonsmokersinchinaprospectivecohortstudy AT wangfei disparityinlungcancerscreeningamongsmokersandnonsmokersinchinaprospectivecohortstudy AT gaoyumeng disparityinlungcancerscreeningamongsmokersandnonsmokersinchinaprospectivecohortstudy AT fangzhimei disparityinlungcancerscreeningamongsmokersandnonsmokersinchinaprospectivecohortstudy AT gongweiwei disparityinlungcancerscreeningamongsmokersandnonsmokersinchinaprospectivecohortstudy AT lihuizhang disparityinlungcancerscreeningamongsmokersandnonsmokersinchinaprospectivecohortstudy AT zhuchen disparityinlungcancerscreeningamongsmokersandnonsmokersinchinaprospectivecohortstudy AT chenyaoyao disparityinlungcancerscreeningamongsmokersandnonsmokersinchinaprospectivecohortstudy AT shilei disparityinlungcancerscreeningamongsmokersandnonsmokersinchinaprospectivecohortstudy AT dulingbin disparityinlungcancerscreeningamongsmokersandnonsmokersinchinaprospectivecohortstudy AT lini disparityinlungcancerscreeningamongsmokersandnonsmokersinchinaprospectivecohortstudy |