Evaluation of learning environment of different family medicine programs, Jeddah-KSA, 2021

BACKGROUND: A supportive educational climate in which learners are educated and monitored is a significant determinant of the medical trainees’ performance and progress and eventually contributes to better patient care. Therefore, residents’ training programs need to be assessed and incorporated according to the views and expectations of the candidates. The objectives of this research are to compare and evaluate the learning environment of Family Medicine (FM) programs in Jeddah and make practical recommendations for improvement of the learning environment. METHODS: A descriptive causal-comparative study was designed at FM programs in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia during January, and February 2021, including all residents from R1 to R4. A Postgraduate Hospital Educational Environment Measure (PHEEM) questionnaire was used in this study. The overall score and the three domains were calculated. RESULTS: Two hundred and eighty-three questionnaires were distributed, and 262 were completed and collected, making a response rate of 92.6%. Females represented were 150 (57.3%), and males were 112 (42.7%). The study shows that 78 (29.8%) of the residents reported that the learning environment was excellent, and 154 (58.8%) described it as a more positive than the negative environment, whereas 29 (11.1%) described it as having a lot of problems. Out of 160 maximum scores, the highest total score (127) was observed among residents at the National Guard program, whereas the lowest score (108) was in the FM joint program, P < 0.001. CONCLUSION: Evaluation of the training programs is an essential component of quality assurance procedures. The satisfaction of the FM residents at different programs in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, is better than reported previously, but however, further improvement is warranted. Juniors and residents of the National Guard program were more satisfied than their peers. We recommend low score items should have special consideration from high authorities and ongoing evaluation of the FM training program for further improvement of the learning environment.