Cargando…
Implementing Blended Care to Discontinue Benzodiazepine Receptor Agonist Use for Insomnia: Process Evaluation of a Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND: Long-term use of benzodiazepine receptor agonists (BZRAs) remains common despite European guidelines advising that these drugs be used in the lowest possible dose and for the shortest possible duration. Half of all BZRAs are prescribed in family practice. This creates a window of opportu...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10132004/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37027198 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/43738 |
_version_ | 1785031305374728192 |
---|---|
author | Coteur, Kristien Van Nuland, Marc Schoenmakers, Birgitte Anthierens, Sibyl Van den Broeck, Kris |
author_facet | Coteur, Kristien Van Nuland, Marc Schoenmakers, Birgitte Anthierens, Sibyl Van den Broeck, Kris |
author_sort | Coteur, Kristien |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Long-term use of benzodiazepine receptor agonists (BZRAs) remains common despite European guidelines advising that these drugs be used in the lowest possible dose and for the shortest possible duration. Half of all BZRAs are prescribed in family practice. This creates a window of opportunity for discontinuation in primary care. Therefore, the effectiveness of blended care for the discontinuation of long-term BZRA use in adult primary care patients with chronic insomnia disorder was tested in a multicenter, pragmatic, and cluster randomized controlled superiority trial in Belgium. In the literature, information on implementing blended care in a primary care setting is scarce. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to contribute to a framework for the successful implementation of blended care in a primary care setting by increasing our understanding of this complex intervention through an evaluation of e-tool use and views and ideas of participants in a BZRA discontinuation trial. METHODS: Based on a theoretical framework, this study evaluated the processes of recruitment, delivery, and response using 4 components: a survey on recruitment (n=76), semistructured in-depth interviews with patients (n=18), web-based asynchronous focus groups with general practitioners (GPs; n=19), and usage data of the web-based tool. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively, and qualitative data were analyzed thematically. RESULTS: For recruitment, the most common barriers were refusal by the patient and the lack of digital literacy, while facilitators were starting the conversation and the curiosity of patients. The delivery of the intervention to the patients was diverse, ranging from GPs who never informed the patient about their access to the e-tool to GPs consulting the e-tool in between consultations to have discussion points when the patient visited. Concerning response, patients’ and GPs’ narratives also showed much variety. For some GPs, daily practice changed because they received more positive reactions than expected and felt empowered to talk more often about BZRA discontinuation. Conversely, some GPs reported no changes in practice or among patients. In general, patients found follow-up by an expert to be the most important component in blended care, whereas GPs deemed the intrinsic motivation of patients to be the key element of success. An important barrier to implementation by the GP was time. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the participants who had used the e-tool were positive about its structure and content. Nevertheless, many patients desired a more tailored application with feedback from an expert and personal tapering schedules. Strict pragmatic implementation of blended care seems to only reach GPs with an interest in digitalization. Although not superior to usual care, blended care could be a complementary tool that allows tailoring the discontinuation process to the personal style of the GP and the needs of the patient. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03937180; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03937180 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10132004 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101320042023-04-27 Implementing Blended Care to Discontinue Benzodiazepine Receptor Agonist Use for Insomnia: Process Evaluation of a Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial Coteur, Kristien Van Nuland, Marc Schoenmakers, Birgitte Anthierens, Sibyl Van den Broeck, Kris JMIR Form Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Long-term use of benzodiazepine receptor agonists (BZRAs) remains common despite European guidelines advising that these drugs be used in the lowest possible dose and for the shortest possible duration. Half of all BZRAs are prescribed in family practice. This creates a window of opportunity for discontinuation in primary care. Therefore, the effectiveness of blended care for the discontinuation of long-term BZRA use in adult primary care patients with chronic insomnia disorder was tested in a multicenter, pragmatic, and cluster randomized controlled superiority trial in Belgium. In the literature, information on implementing blended care in a primary care setting is scarce. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to contribute to a framework for the successful implementation of blended care in a primary care setting by increasing our understanding of this complex intervention through an evaluation of e-tool use and views and ideas of participants in a BZRA discontinuation trial. METHODS: Based on a theoretical framework, this study evaluated the processes of recruitment, delivery, and response using 4 components: a survey on recruitment (n=76), semistructured in-depth interviews with patients (n=18), web-based asynchronous focus groups with general practitioners (GPs; n=19), and usage data of the web-based tool. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively, and qualitative data were analyzed thematically. RESULTS: For recruitment, the most common barriers were refusal by the patient and the lack of digital literacy, while facilitators were starting the conversation and the curiosity of patients. The delivery of the intervention to the patients was diverse, ranging from GPs who never informed the patient about their access to the e-tool to GPs consulting the e-tool in between consultations to have discussion points when the patient visited. Concerning response, patients’ and GPs’ narratives also showed much variety. For some GPs, daily practice changed because they received more positive reactions than expected and felt empowered to talk more often about BZRA discontinuation. Conversely, some GPs reported no changes in practice or among patients. In general, patients found follow-up by an expert to be the most important component in blended care, whereas GPs deemed the intrinsic motivation of patients to be the key element of success. An important barrier to implementation by the GP was time. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the participants who had used the e-tool were positive about its structure and content. Nevertheless, many patients desired a more tailored application with feedback from an expert and personal tapering schedules. Strict pragmatic implementation of blended care seems to only reach GPs with an interest in digitalization. Although not superior to usual care, blended care could be a complementary tool that allows tailoring the discontinuation process to the personal style of the GP and the needs of the patient. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03937180; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03937180 JMIR Publications 2023-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10132004/ /pubmed/37027198 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/43738 Text en ©Kristien Coteur, Marc Van Nuland, Birgitte Schoenmakers, Sibyl Anthierens, Kris Van den Broeck. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 07.04.2023. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Formative Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://formative.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Coteur, Kristien Van Nuland, Marc Schoenmakers, Birgitte Anthierens, Sibyl Van den Broeck, Kris Implementing Blended Care to Discontinue Benzodiazepine Receptor Agonist Use for Insomnia: Process Evaluation of a Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial |
title | Implementing Blended Care to Discontinue Benzodiazepine Receptor Agonist Use for Insomnia: Process Evaluation of a Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full | Implementing Blended Care to Discontinue Benzodiazepine Receptor Agonist Use for Insomnia: Process Evaluation of a Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | Implementing Blended Care to Discontinue Benzodiazepine Receptor Agonist Use for Insomnia: Process Evaluation of a Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementing Blended Care to Discontinue Benzodiazepine Receptor Agonist Use for Insomnia: Process Evaluation of a Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_short | Implementing Blended Care to Discontinue Benzodiazepine Receptor Agonist Use for Insomnia: Process Evaluation of a Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_sort | implementing blended care to discontinue benzodiazepine receptor agonist use for insomnia: process evaluation of a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10132004/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37027198 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/43738 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT coteurkristien implementingblendedcaretodiscontinuebenzodiazepinereceptoragonistuseforinsomniaprocessevaluationofapragmaticclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vannulandmarc implementingblendedcaretodiscontinuebenzodiazepinereceptoragonistuseforinsomniaprocessevaluationofapragmaticclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT schoenmakersbirgitte implementingblendedcaretodiscontinuebenzodiazepinereceptoragonistuseforinsomniaprocessevaluationofapragmaticclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT anthierenssibyl implementingblendedcaretodiscontinuebenzodiazepinereceptoragonistuseforinsomniaprocessevaluationofapragmaticclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vandenbroeckkris implementingblendedcaretodiscontinuebenzodiazepinereceptoragonistuseforinsomniaprocessevaluationofapragmaticclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial |