Cargando…

Implementing Blended Care to Discontinue Benzodiazepine Receptor Agonist Use for Insomnia: Process Evaluation of a Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: Long-term use of benzodiazepine receptor agonists (BZRAs) remains common despite European guidelines advising that these drugs be used in the lowest possible dose and for the shortest possible duration. Half of all BZRAs are prescribed in family practice. This creates a window of opportu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coteur, Kristien, Van Nuland, Marc, Schoenmakers, Birgitte, Anthierens, Sibyl, Van den Broeck, Kris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10132004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37027198
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/43738
_version_ 1785031305374728192
author Coteur, Kristien
Van Nuland, Marc
Schoenmakers, Birgitte
Anthierens, Sibyl
Van den Broeck, Kris
author_facet Coteur, Kristien
Van Nuland, Marc
Schoenmakers, Birgitte
Anthierens, Sibyl
Van den Broeck, Kris
author_sort Coteur, Kristien
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Long-term use of benzodiazepine receptor agonists (BZRAs) remains common despite European guidelines advising that these drugs be used in the lowest possible dose and for the shortest possible duration. Half of all BZRAs are prescribed in family practice. This creates a window of opportunity for discontinuation in primary care. Therefore, the effectiveness of blended care for the discontinuation of long-term BZRA use in adult primary care patients with chronic insomnia disorder was tested in a multicenter, pragmatic, and cluster randomized controlled superiority trial in Belgium. In the literature, information on implementing blended care in a primary care setting is scarce. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to contribute to a framework for the successful implementation of blended care in a primary care setting by increasing our understanding of this complex intervention through an evaluation of e-tool use and views and ideas of participants in a BZRA discontinuation trial. METHODS: Based on a theoretical framework, this study evaluated the processes of recruitment, delivery, and response using 4 components: a survey on recruitment (n=76), semistructured in-depth interviews with patients (n=18), web-based asynchronous focus groups with general practitioners (GPs; n=19), and usage data of the web-based tool. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively, and qualitative data were analyzed thematically. RESULTS: For recruitment, the most common barriers were refusal by the patient and the lack of digital literacy, while facilitators were starting the conversation and the curiosity of patients. The delivery of the intervention to the patients was diverse, ranging from GPs who never informed the patient about their access to the e-tool to GPs consulting the e-tool in between consultations to have discussion points when the patient visited. Concerning response, patients’ and GPs’ narratives also showed much variety. For some GPs, daily practice changed because they received more positive reactions than expected and felt empowered to talk more often about BZRA discontinuation. Conversely, some GPs reported no changes in practice or among patients. In general, patients found follow-up by an expert to be the most important component in blended care, whereas GPs deemed the intrinsic motivation of patients to be the key element of success. An important barrier to implementation by the GP was time. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the participants who had used the e-tool were positive about its structure and content. Nevertheless, many patients desired a more tailored application with feedback from an expert and personal tapering schedules. Strict pragmatic implementation of blended care seems to only reach GPs with an interest in digitalization. Although not superior to usual care, blended care could be a complementary tool that allows tailoring the discontinuation process to the personal style of the GP and the needs of the patient. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03937180; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03937180
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10132004
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101320042023-04-27 Implementing Blended Care to Discontinue Benzodiazepine Receptor Agonist Use for Insomnia: Process Evaluation of a Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial Coteur, Kristien Van Nuland, Marc Schoenmakers, Birgitte Anthierens, Sibyl Van den Broeck, Kris JMIR Form Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Long-term use of benzodiazepine receptor agonists (BZRAs) remains common despite European guidelines advising that these drugs be used in the lowest possible dose and for the shortest possible duration. Half of all BZRAs are prescribed in family practice. This creates a window of opportunity for discontinuation in primary care. Therefore, the effectiveness of blended care for the discontinuation of long-term BZRA use in adult primary care patients with chronic insomnia disorder was tested in a multicenter, pragmatic, and cluster randomized controlled superiority trial in Belgium. In the literature, information on implementing blended care in a primary care setting is scarce. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to contribute to a framework for the successful implementation of blended care in a primary care setting by increasing our understanding of this complex intervention through an evaluation of e-tool use and views and ideas of participants in a BZRA discontinuation trial. METHODS: Based on a theoretical framework, this study evaluated the processes of recruitment, delivery, and response using 4 components: a survey on recruitment (n=76), semistructured in-depth interviews with patients (n=18), web-based asynchronous focus groups with general practitioners (GPs; n=19), and usage data of the web-based tool. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively, and qualitative data were analyzed thematically. RESULTS: For recruitment, the most common barriers were refusal by the patient and the lack of digital literacy, while facilitators were starting the conversation and the curiosity of patients. The delivery of the intervention to the patients was diverse, ranging from GPs who never informed the patient about their access to the e-tool to GPs consulting the e-tool in between consultations to have discussion points when the patient visited. Concerning response, patients’ and GPs’ narratives also showed much variety. For some GPs, daily practice changed because they received more positive reactions than expected and felt empowered to talk more often about BZRA discontinuation. Conversely, some GPs reported no changes in practice or among patients. In general, patients found follow-up by an expert to be the most important component in blended care, whereas GPs deemed the intrinsic motivation of patients to be the key element of success. An important barrier to implementation by the GP was time. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the participants who had used the e-tool were positive about its structure and content. Nevertheless, many patients desired a more tailored application with feedback from an expert and personal tapering schedules. Strict pragmatic implementation of blended care seems to only reach GPs with an interest in digitalization. Although not superior to usual care, blended care could be a complementary tool that allows tailoring the discontinuation process to the personal style of the GP and the needs of the patient. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03937180; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03937180 JMIR Publications 2023-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10132004/ /pubmed/37027198 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/43738 Text en ©Kristien Coteur, Marc Van Nuland, Birgitte Schoenmakers, Sibyl Anthierens, Kris Van den Broeck. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 07.04.2023. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Formative Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://formative.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Coteur, Kristien
Van Nuland, Marc
Schoenmakers, Birgitte
Anthierens, Sibyl
Van den Broeck, Kris
Implementing Blended Care to Discontinue Benzodiazepine Receptor Agonist Use for Insomnia: Process Evaluation of a Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
title Implementing Blended Care to Discontinue Benzodiazepine Receptor Agonist Use for Insomnia: Process Evaluation of a Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Implementing Blended Care to Discontinue Benzodiazepine Receptor Agonist Use for Insomnia: Process Evaluation of a Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Implementing Blended Care to Discontinue Benzodiazepine Receptor Agonist Use for Insomnia: Process Evaluation of a Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Implementing Blended Care to Discontinue Benzodiazepine Receptor Agonist Use for Insomnia: Process Evaluation of a Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Implementing Blended Care to Discontinue Benzodiazepine Receptor Agonist Use for Insomnia: Process Evaluation of a Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort implementing blended care to discontinue benzodiazepine receptor agonist use for insomnia: process evaluation of a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10132004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37027198
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/43738
work_keys_str_mv AT coteurkristien implementingblendedcaretodiscontinuebenzodiazepinereceptoragonistuseforinsomniaprocessevaluationofapragmaticclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vannulandmarc implementingblendedcaretodiscontinuebenzodiazepinereceptoragonistuseforinsomniaprocessevaluationofapragmaticclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT schoenmakersbirgitte implementingblendedcaretodiscontinuebenzodiazepinereceptoragonistuseforinsomniaprocessevaluationofapragmaticclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT anthierenssibyl implementingblendedcaretodiscontinuebenzodiazepinereceptoragonistuseforinsomniaprocessevaluationofapragmaticclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vandenbroeckkris implementingblendedcaretodiscontinuebenzodiazepinereceptoragonistuseforinsomniaprocessevaluationofapragmaticclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial