Cargando…
Comparison among plaque assay, tissue culture infectious dose (TCID(50)) and real-time RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 variants quantification
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOC) and interest (VOI) pose a significant threat to public health because the rapid change in the SARS-CoV-2 genome can alter viral phenotypes such as virulence, transmissibility and the ability to evade the host response. Hence, SARS-CoV-2...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10132340/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37124861 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijm.v14i3.9758 |
_version_ | 1785031370744004608 |
---|---|
author | Zapata-Cardona, Maria Isabel Flórez-Álvarez, Lizdany Gómez-Gallego, Diana Maryory Moncada-Díaz, María Juliana Hernandez, Juan Carlos Díaz, Francisco Rugeles, María Teresa Aguilar-Jiménez, Wbeimar Zapata, Wildeman |
author_facet | Zapata-Cardona, Maria Isabel Flórez-Álvarez, Lizdany Gómez-Gallego, Diana Maryory Moncada-Díaz, María Juliana Hernandez, Juan Carlos Díaz, Francisco Rugeles, María Teresa Aguilar-Jiménez, Wbeimar Zapata, Wildeman |
author_sort | Zapata-Cardona, Maria Isabel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOC) and interest (VOI) pose a significant threat to public health because the rapid change in the SARS-CoV-2 genome can alter viral phenotypes such as virulence, transmissibility and the ability to evade the host response. Hence, SARS-CoV-2 quantification techniques are essential for timely diagnosis and follow-up. Besides, they are vital to understanding viral pathogenesis, antiviral evaluation, and vaccine development. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five isolates of SARS-CoV-2: D614G strain (B.1), three VOC (Alpha, Gamma and Delta), and one VOI (Mu) were used to compare three techniques for viral quantification, plaque assay, median tissue culture infectious dose (TCID(50)) and real-time RT-PCR. RESULTS: Plaque assay showed viral titers between 0.15 ± 0.01×10(7) and 1.95 ± 0.09×10(7) PFU/mL while viral titer by TCID(50) assay was between 0.71 ± 0.01×10(6) to 4.94 ± 0.80×10(6) TCID(50)/mL for the five SARS-CoV-2 isolates. The PFU/mL titer obtained by plaque and the calculated from TCID(50) assays differed by 0.61 log10, 0.59 log10, 0.59 log10 and 0.96 log10 for Alfa, Gamma, Delta, and Mu variants (p≤0.0007), respectively. No differences were observed for the D614G strain. Real-time PCR assay exhibited titers ranging from 0.39 ± 0.001×10(8) to 3.38 ± 0.04×10(8) RNA copies/μL for all variants. The relation between PFU/mL and RNA copies/mL was 1:29800 for D614G strain, 1:11700 for Alpha, 1:8930 for Gamma, 1:12500 for Delta, and 1:2950 for Mu. CONCLUSION: TCID(50) assay was comparable to plaque assay for D614G but not for others SARS-CoV-2 variants. Our data demonstrated a correlation among PFU/mL and E gene RNA copies/μL, units of measure commonly used to quantify the viral load in diagnostic and research fields. The results suggest that the proportion of infectious virions in vitro changes depending on the SARS-CoV-2 variant, being Mu, the variant reaching a higher viral titer with fewer viral copies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10132340 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Tehran University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101323402023-04-27 Comparison among plaque assay, tissue culture infectious dose (TCID(50)) and real-time RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 variants quantification Zapata-Cardona, Maria Isabel Flórez-Álvarez, Lizdany Gómez-Gallego, Diana Maryory Moncada-Díaz, María Juliana Hernandez, Juan Carlos Díaz, Francisco Rugeles, María Teresa Aguilar-Jiménez, Wbeimar Zapata, Wildeman Iran J Microbiol Original Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOC) and interest (VOI) pose a significant threat to public health because the rapid change in the SARS-CoV-2 genome can alter viral phenotypes such as virulence, transmissibility and the ability to evade the host response. Hence, SARS-CoV-2 quantification techniques are essential for timely diagnosis and follow-up. Besides, they are vital to understanding viral pathogenesis, antiviral evaluation, and vaccine development. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five isolates of SARS-CoV-2: D614G strain (B.1), three VOC (Alpha, Gamma and Delta), and one VOI (Mu) were used to compare three techniques for viral quantification, plaque assay, median tissue culture infectious dose (TCID(50)) and real-time RT-PCR. RESULTS: Plaque assay showed viral titers between 0.15 ± 0.01×10(7) and 1.95 ± 0.09×10(7) PFU/mL while viral titer by TCID(50) assay was between 0.71 ± 0.01×10(6) to 4.94 ± 0.80×10(6) TCID(50)/mL for the five SARS-CoV-2 isolates. The PFU/mL titer obtained by plaque and the calculated from TCID(50) assays differed by 0.61 log10, 0.59 log10, 0.59 log10 and 0.96 log10 for Alfa, Gamma, Delta, and Mu variants (p≤0.0007), respectively. No differences were observed for the D614G strain. Real-time PCR assay exhibited titers ranging from 0.39 ± 0.001×10(8) to 3.38 ± 0.04×10(8) RNA copies/μL for all variants. The relation between PFU/mL and RNA copies/mL was 1:29800 for D614G strain, 1:11700 for Alpha, 1:8930 for Gamma, 1:12500 for Delta, and 1:2950 for Mu. CONCLUSION: TCID(50) assay was comparable to plaque assay for D614G but not for others SARS-CoV-2 variants. Our data demonstrated a correlation among PFU/mL and E gene RNA copies/μL, units of measure commonly used to quantify the viral load in diagnostic and research fields. The results suggest that the proportion of infectious virions in vitro changes depending on the SARS-CoV-2 variant, being Mu, the variant reaching a higher viral titer with fewer viral copies. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10132340/ /pubmed/37124861 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijm.v14i3.9758 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Tehran University of Medical Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Zapata-Cardona, Maria Isabel Flórez-Álvarez, Lizdany Gómez-Gallego, Diana Maryory Moncada-Díaz, María Juliana Hernandez, Juan Carlos Díaz, Francisco Rugeles, María Teresa Aguilar-Jiménez, Wbeimar Zapata, Wildeman Comparison among plaque assay, tissue culture infectious dose (TCID(50)) and real-time RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 variants quantification |
title | Comparison among plaque assay, tissue culture infectious dose (TCID(50)) and real-time RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 variants quantification |
title_full | Comparison among plaque assay, tissue culture infectious dose (TCID(50)) and real-time RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 variants quantification |
title_fullStr | Comparison among plaque assay, tissue culture infectious dose (TCID(50)) and real-time RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 variants quantification |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison among plaque assay, tissue culture infectious dose (TCID(50)) and real-time RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 variants quantification |
title_short | Comparison among plaque assay, tissue culture infectious dose (TCID(50)) and real-time RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 variants quantification |
title_sort | comparison among plaque assay, tissue culture infectious dose (tcid(50)) and real-time rt-pcr for sars-cov-2 variants quantification |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10132340/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37124861 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijm.v14i3.9758 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zapatacardonamariaisabel comparisonamongplaqueassaytissuecultureinfectiousdosetcid50andrealtimertpcrforsarscov2variantsquantification AT florezalvarezlizdany comparisonamongplaqueassaytissuecultureinfectiousdosetcid50andrealtimertpcrforsarscov2variantsquantification AT gomezgallegodianamaryory comparisonamongplaqueassaytissuecultureinfectiousdosetcid50andrealtimertpcrforsarscov2variantsquantification AT moncadadiazmariajuliana comparisonamongplaqueassaytissuecultureinfectiousdosetcid50andrealtimertpcrforsarscov2variantsquantification AT hernandezjuancarlos comparisonamongplaqueassaytissuecultureinfectiousdosetcid50andrealtimertpcrforsarscov2variantsquantification AT diazfrancisco comparisonamongplaqueassaytissuecultureinfectiousdosetcid50andrealtimertpcrforsarscov2variantsquantification AT rugelesmariateresa comparisonamongplaqueassaytissuecultureinfectiousdosetcid50andrealtimertpcrforsarscov2variantsquantification AT aguilarjimenezwbeimar comparisonamongplaqueassaytissuecultureinfectiousdosetcid50andrealtimertpcrforsarscov2variantsquantification AT zapatawildeman comparisonamongplaqueassaytissuecultureinfectiousdosetcid50andrealtimertpcrforsarscov2variantsquantification |