Cargando…

Comparison among plaque assay, tissue culture infectious dose (TCID(50)) and real-time RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 variants quantification

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOC) and interest (VOI) pose a significant threat to public health because the rapid change in the SARS-CoV-2 genome can alter viral phenotypes such as virulence, transmissibility and the ability to evade the host response. Hence, SARS-CoV-2...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zapata-Cardona, Maria Isabel, Flórez-Álvarez, Lizdany, Gómez-Gallego, Diana Maryory, Moncada-Díaz, María Juliana, Hernandez, Juan Carlos, Díaz, Francisco, Rugeles, María Teresa, Aguilar-Jiménez, Wbeimar, Zapata, Wildeman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10132340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37124861
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijm.v14i3.9758
_version_ 1785031370744004608
author Zapata-Cardona, Maria Isabel
Flórez-Álvarez, Lizdany
Gómez-Gallego, Diana Maryory
Moncada-Díaz, María Juliana
Hernandez, Juan Carlos
Díaz, Francisco
Rugeles, María Teresa
Aguilar-Jiménez, Wbeimar
Zapata, Wildeman
author_facet Zapata-Cardona, Maria Isabel
Flórez-Álvarez, Lizdany
Gómez-Gallego, Diana Maryory
Moncada-Díaz, María Juliana
Hernandez, Juan Carlos
Díaz, Francisco
Rugeles, María Teresa
Aguilar-Jiménez, Wbeimar
Zapata, Wildeman
author_sort Zapata-Cardona, Maria Isabel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOC) and interest (VOI) pose a significant threat to public health because the rapid change in the SARS-CoV-2 genome can alter viral phenotypes such as virulence, transmissibility and the ability to evade the host response. Hence, SARS-CoV-2 quantification techniques are essential for timely diagnosis and follow-up. Besides, they are vital to understanding viral pathogenesis, antiviral evaluation, and vaccine development. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five isolates of SARS-CoV-2: D614G strain (B.1), three VOC (Alpha, Gamma and Delta), and one VOI (Mu) were used to compare three techniques for viral quantification, plaque assay, median tissue culture infectious dose (TCID(50)) and real-time RT-PCR. RESULTS: Plaque assay showed viral titers between 0.15 ± 0.01×10(7) and 1.95 ± 0.09×10(7) PFU/mL while viral titer by TCID(50) assay was between 0.71 ± 0.01×10(6) to 4.94 ± 0.80×10(6) TCID(50)/mL for the five SARS-CoV-2 isolates. The PFU/mL titer obtained by plaque and the calculated from TCID(50) assays differed by 0.61 log10, 0.59 log10, 0.59 log10 and 0.96 log10 for Alfa, Gamma, Delta, and Mu variants (p≤0.0007), respectively. No differences were observed for the D614G strain. Real-time PCR assay exhibited titers ranging from 0.39 ± 0.001×10(8) to 3.38 ± 0.04×10(8) RNA copies/μL for all variants. The relation between PFU/mL and RNA copies/mL was 1:29800 for D614G strain, 1:11700 for Alpha, 1:8930 for Gamma, 1:12500 for Delta, and 1:2950 for Mu. CONCLUSION: TCID(50) assay was comparable to plaque assay for D614G but not for others SARS-CoV-2 variants. Our data demonstrated a correlation among PFU/mL and E gene RNA copies/μL, units of measure commonly used to quantify the viral load in diagnostic and research fields. The results suggest that the proportion of infectious virions in vitro changes depending on the SARS-CoV-2 variant, being Mu, the variant reaching a higher viral titer with fewer viral copies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10132340
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101323402023-04-27 Comparison among plaque assay, tissue culture infectious dose (TCID(50)) and real-time RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 variants quantification Zapata-Cardona, Maria Isabel Flórez-Álvarez, Lizdany Gómez-Gallego, Diana Maryory Moncada-Díaz, María Juliana Hernandez, Juan Carlos Díaz, Francisco Rugeles, María Teresa Aguilar-Jiménez, Wbeimar Zapata, Wildeman Iran J Microbiol Original Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOC) and interest (VOI) pose a significant threat to public health because the rapid change in the SARS-CoV-2 genome can alter viral phenotypes such as virulence, transmissibility and the ability to evade the host response. Hence, SARS-CoV-2 quantification techniques are essential for timely diagnosis and follow-up. Besides, they are vital to understanding viral pathogenesis, antiviral evaluation, and vaccine development. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five isolates of SARS-CoV-2: D614G strain (B.1), three VOC (Alpha, Gamma and Delta), and one VOI (Mu) were used to compare three techniques for viral quantification, plaque assay, median tissue culture infectious dose (TCID(50)) and real-time RT-PCR. RESULTS: Plaque assay showed viral titers between 0.15 ± 0.01×10(7) and 1.95 ± 0.09×10(7) PFU/mL while viral titer by TCID(50) assay was between 0.71 ± 0.01×10(6) to 4.94 ± 0.80×10(6) TCID(50)/mL for the five SARS-CoV-2 isolates. The PFU/mL titer obtained by plaque and the calculated from TCID(50) assays differed by 0.61 log10, 0.59 log10, 0.59 log10 and 0.96 log10 for Alfa, Gamma, Delta, and Mu variants (p≤0.0007), respectively. No differences were observed for the D614G strain. Real-time PCR assay exhibited titers ranging from 0.39 ± 0.001×10(8) to 3.38 ± 0.04×10(8) RNA copies/μL for all variants. The relation between PFU/mL and RNA copies/mL was 1:29800 for D614G strain, 1:11700 for Alpha, 1:8930 for Gamma, 1:12500 for Delta, and 1:2950 for Mu. CONCLUSION: TCID(50) assay was comparable to plaque assay for D614G but not for others SARS-CoV-2 variants. Our data demonstrated a correlation among PFU/mL and E gene RNA copies/μL, units of measure commonly used to quantify the viral load in diagnostic and research fields. The results suggest that the proportion of infectious virions in vitro changes depending on the SARS-CoV-2 variant, being Mu, the variant reaching a higher viral titer with fewer viral copies. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10132340/ /pubmed/37124861 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijm.v14i3.9758 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Tehran University of Medical Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Zapata-Cardona, Maria Isabel
Flórez-Álvarez, Lizdany
Gómez-Gallego, Diana Maryory
Moncada-Díaz, María Juliana
Hernandez, Juan Carlos
Díaz, Francisco
Rugeles, María Teresa
Aguilar-Jiménez, Wbeimar
Zapata, Wildeman
Comparison among plaque assay, tissue culture infectious dose (TCID(50)) and real-time RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 variants quantification
title Comparison among plaque assay, tissue culture infectious dose (TCID(50)) and real-time RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 variants quantification
title_full Comparison among plaque assay, tissue culture infectious dose (TCID(50)) and real-time RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 variants quantification
title_fullStr Comparison among plaque assay, tissue culture infectious dose (TCID(50)) and real-time RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 variants quantification
title_full_unstemmed Comparison among plaque assay, tissue culture infectious dose (TCID(50)) and real-time RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 variants quantification
title_short Comparison among plaque assay, tissue culture infectious dose (TCID(50)) and real-time RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 variants quantification
title_sort comparison among plaque assay, tissue culture infectious dose (tcid(50)) and real-time rt-pcr for sars-cov-2 variants quantification
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10132340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37124861
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijm.v14i3.9758
work_keys_str_mv AT zapatacardonamariaisabel comparisonamongplaqueassaytissuecultureinfectiousdosetcid50andrealtimertpcrforsarscov2variantsquantification
AT florezalvarezlizdany comparisonamongplaqueassaytissuecultureinfectiousdosetcid50andrealtimertpcrforsarscov2variantsquantification
AT gomezgallegodianamaryory comparisonamongplaqueassaytissuecultureinfectiousdosetcid50andrealtimertpcrforsarscov2variantsquantification
AT moncadadiazmariajuliana comparisonamongplaqueassaytissuecultureinfectiousdosetcid50andrealtimertpcrforsarscov2variantsquantification
AT hernandezjuancarlos comparisonamongplaqueassaytissuecultureinfectiousdosetcid50andrealtimertpcrforsarscov2variantsquantification
AT diazfrancisco comparisonamongplaqueassaytissuecultureinfectiousdosetcid50andrealtimertpcrforsarscov2variantsquantification
AT rugelesmariateresa comparisonamongplaqueassaytissuecultureinfectiousdosetcid50andrealtimertpcrforsarscov2variantsquantification
AT aguilarjimenezwbeimar comparisonamongplaqueassaytissuecultureinfectiousdosetcid50andrealtimertpcrforsarscov2variantsquantification
AT zapatawildeman comparisonamongplaqueassaytissuecultureinfectiousdosetcid50andrealtimertpcrforsarscov2variantsquantification