Cargando…
Inequities in Medically Assisted Reproduction: a Scoping Review
Infertility has a high prevalence in the USA and health inequities play a large role in access to medically assisted reproduction (MAR). The aim of this study was to identify gaps in research pertaining to inequities in MAR and propose suggestions for future research directions. Searches were perfor...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10132432/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37099229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43032-023-01236-6 |
_version_ | 1785031386407632896 |
---|---|
author | Huddleston, Abbi Ray, Kaylin Bacani, Rigel Staggs, Jordan Anderson, Reece M. Vassar, Matt |
author_facet | Huddleston, Abbi Ray, Kaylin Bacani, Rigel Staggs, Jordan Anderson, Reece M. Vassar, Matt |
author_sort | Huddleston, Abbi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Infertility has a high prevalence in the USA and health inequities play a large role in access to medically assisted reproduction (MAR). The aim of this study was to identify gaps in research pertaining to inequities in MAR and propose suggestions for future research directions. Searches were performed using MEDLINE and Ovid Embase. Articles that reported on MAR inequities, published between 2016 and 2021 in the USA, and written in English were included. The inequities investigated were adapted from the NIH-designated health disparities populations. Each article’s inequity findings were extracted and reported, along with frequencies of inequities. Our sample included 66 studies. The majority of the studies investigated MAR outcomes by race/ethnicity and found that historically marginalized populations had poorer outcomes. LGBTQ + populations were less likely to use MAR or seek infertility care. Most studies found positive correlations with MAR use with income and education. The least commonly studied inequities in our sample were sex and/or gender and rural/under-resourced populations; findings showed that men and people from rural/under-resourced populations were less likely to access MAR. Studies that examined occupational status had varying findings. We suggest that future research be targeted toward: (1) standardizing and diversifying race/ethnicity reporting regarding MAR, (2) the use of community-based participatory research to increase data for LGBTQ + patients, and (3) increasing access to infertility care for men. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43032-023-01236-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10132432 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101324322023-04-27 Inequities in Medically Assisted Reproduction: a Scoping Review Huddleston, Abbi Ray, Kaylin Bacani, Rigel Staggs, Jordan Anderson, Reece M. Vassar, Matt Reprod Sci Review Infertility has a high prevalence in the USA and health inequities play a large role in access to medically assisted reproduction (MAR). The aim of this study was to identify gaps in research pertaining to inequities in MAR and propose suggestions for future research directions. Searches were performed using MEDLINE and Ovid Embase. Articles that reported on MAR inequities, published between 2016 and 2021 in the USA, and written in English were included. The inequities investigated were adapted from the NIH-designated health disparities populations. Each article’s inequity findings were extracted and reported, along with frequencies of inequities. Our sample included 66 studies. The majority of the studies investigated MAR outcomes by race/ethnicity and found that historically marginalized populations had poorer outcomes. LGBTQ + populations were less likely to use MAR or seek infertility care. Most studies found positive correlations with MAR use with income and education. The least commonly studied inequities in our sample were sex and/or gender and rural/under-resourced populations; findings showed that men and people from rural/under-resourced populations were less likely to access MAR. Studies that examined occupational status had varying findings. We suggest that future research be targeted toward: (1) standardizing and diversifying race/ethnicity reporting regarding MAR, (2) the use of community-based participatory research to increase data for LGBTQ + patients, and (3) increasing access to infertility care for men. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43032-023-01236-6. Springer International Publishing 2023-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10132432/ /pubmed/37099229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43032-023-01236-6 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Society for Reproductive Investigation 2023, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Review Huddleston, Abbi Ray, Kaylin Bacani, Rigel Staggs, Jordan Anderson, Reece M. Vassar, Matt Inequities in Medically Assisted Reproduction: a Scoping Review |
title | Inequities in Medically Assisted Reproduction: a Scoping Review |
title_full | Inequities in Medically Assisted Reproduction: a Scoping Review |
title_fullStr | Inequities in Medically Assisted Reproduction: a Scoping Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Inequities in Medically Assisted Reproduction: a Scoping Review |
title_short | Inequities in Medically Assisted Reproduction: a Scoping Review |
title_sort | inequities in medically assisted reproduction: a scoping review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10132432/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37099229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43032-023-01236-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huddlestonabbi inequitiesinmedicallyassistedreproductionascopingreview AT raykaylin inequitiesinmedicallyassistedreproductionascopingreview AT bacanirigel inequitiesinmedicallyassistedreproductionascopingreview AT staggsjordan inequitiesinmedicallyassistedreproductionascopingreview AT andersonreecem inequitiesinmedicallyassistedreproductionascopingreview AT vassarmatt inequitiesinmedicallyassistedreproductionascopingreview |