Cargando…

Inequities in Medically Assisted Reproduction: a Scoping Review

Infertility has a high prevalence in the USA and health inequities play a large role in access to medically assisted reproduction (MAR). The aim of this study was to identify gaps in research pertaining to inequities in MAR and propose suggestions for future research directions. Searches were perfor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huddleston, Abbi, Ray, Kaylin, Bacani, Rigel, Staggs, Jordan, Anderson, Reece M., Vassar, Matt
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10132432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37099229
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43032-023-01236-6
_version_ 1785031386407632896
author Huddleston, Abbi
Ray, Kaylin
Bacani, Rigel
Staggs, Jordan
Anderson, Reece M.
Vassar, Matt
author_facet Huddleston, Abbi
Ray, Kaylin
Bacani, Rigel
Staggs, Jordan
Anderson, Reece M.
Vassar, Matt
author_sort Huddleston, Abbi
collection PubMed
description Infertility has a high prevalence in the USA and health inequities play a large role in access to medically assisted reproduction (MAR). The aim of this study was to identify gaps in research pertaining to inequities in MAR and propose suggestions for future research directions. Searches were performed using MEDLINE and Ovid Embase. Articles that reported on MAR inequities, published between 2016 and 2021 in the USA, and written in English were included. The inequities investigated were adapted from the NIH-designated health disparities populations. Each article’s inequity findings were extracted and reported, along with frequencies of inequities. Our sample included 66 studies. The majority of the studies investigated MAR outcomes by race/ethnicity and found that historically marginalized populations had poorer outcomes. LGBTQ + populations were less likely to use MAR or seek infertility care. Most studies found positive correlations with MAR use with income and education. The least commonly studied inequities in our sample were sex and/or gender and rural/under-resourced populations; findings showed that men and people from rural/under-resourced populations were less likely to access MAR. Studies that examined occupational status had varying findings. We suggest that future research be targeted toward: (1) standardizing and diversifying race/ethnicity reporting regarding MAR, (2) the use of community-based participatory research to increase data for LGBTQ + patients, and (3) increasing access to infertility care for men. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43032-023-01236-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10132432
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101324322023-04-27 Inequities in Medically Assisted Reproduction: a Scoping Review Huddleston, Abbi Ray, Kaylin Bacani, Rigel Staggs, Jordan Anderson, Reece M. Vassar, Matt Reprod Sci Review Infertility has a high prevalence in the USA and health inequities play a large role in access to medically assisted reproduction (MAR). The aim of this study was to identify gaps in research pertaining to inequities in MAR and propose suggestions for future research directions. Searches were performed using MEDLINE and Ovid Embase. Articles that reported on MAR inequities, published between 2016 and 2021 in the USA, and written in English were included. The inequities investigated were adapted from the NIH-designated health disparities populations. Each article’s inequity findings were extracted and reported, along with frequencies of inequities. Our sample included 66 studies. The majority of the studies investigated MAR outcomes by race/ethnicity and found that historically marginalized populations had poorer outcomes. LGBTQ + populations were less likely to use MAR or seek infertility care. Most studies found positive correlations with MAR use with income and education. The least commonly studied inequities in our sample were sex and/or gender and rural/under-resourced populations; findings showed that men and people from rural/under-resourced populations were less likely to access MAR. Studies that examined occupational status had varying findings. We suggest that future research be targeted toward: (1) standardizing and diversifying race/ethnicity reporting regarding MAR, (2) the use of community-based participatory research to increase data for LGBTQ + patients, and (3) increasing access to infertility care for men. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43032-023-01236-6. Springer International Publishing 2023-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10132432/ /pubmed/37099229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43032-023-01236-6 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Society for Reproductive Investigation 2023, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Review
Huddleston, Abbi
Ray, Kaylin
Bacani, Rigel
Staggs, Jordan
Anderson, Reece M.
Vassar, Matt
Inequities in Medically Assisted Reproduction: a Scoping Review
title Inequities in Medically Assisted Reproduction: a Scoping Review
title_full Inequities in Medically Assisted Reproduction: a Scoping Review
title_fullStr Inequities in Medically Assisted Reproduction: a Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Inequities in Medically Assisted Reproduction: a Scoping Review
title_short Inequities in Medically Assisted Reproduction: a Scoping Review
title_sort inequities in medically assisted reproduction: a scoping review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10132432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37099229
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43032-023-01236-6
work_keys_str_mv AT huddlestonabbi inequitiesinmedicallyassistedreproductionascopingreview
AT raykaylin inequitiesinmedicallyassistedreproductionascopingreview
AT bacanirigel inequitiesinmedicallyassistedreproductionascopingreview
AT staggsjordan inequitiesinmedicallyassistedreproductionascopingreview
AT andersonreecem inequitiesinmedicallyassistedreproductionascopingreview
AT vassarmatt inequitiesinmedicallyassistedreproductionascopingreview