Cargando…

Cardiac resynchronization therapy: present and future

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) via biventricular pacing (BVP) is a well-established therapy for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and left bundle branch block, who remain symptomatic despite optimal medical therapy. Despite the long-standing clinical evidence, as we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schiavone, Marco, Arosio, Roberto, Valenza, Simone, Ruggiero, Diego, Mitacchione, Gianfranco, Lombardi, Leonida, Viecca, Maurizio, Forleo, Giovanni Battista
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10132566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37125274
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suad046
_version_ 1785031409150197760
author Schiavone, Marco
Arosio, Roberto
Valenza, Simone
Ruggiero, Diego
Mitacchione, Gianfranco
Lombardi, Leonida
Viecca, Maurizio
Forleo, Giovanni Battista
author_facet Schiavone, Marco
Arosio, Roberto
Valenza, Simone
Ruggiero, Diego
Mitacchione, Gianfranco
Lombardi, Leonida
Viecca, Maurizio
Forleo, Giovanni Battista
author_sort Schiavone, Marco
collection PubMed
description Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) via biventricular pacing (BVP) is a well-established therapy for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and left bundle branch block, who remain symptomatic despite optimal medical therapy. Despite the long-standing clinical evidence, as well as the familiarity of cardiac electrophysiologists with the implantation technique, CRT via BVP cannot be achieved or may result ineffective in up to one-third of the patients. Therefore, new alternative techniques, such as conduction system pacing and left ventricular pacing, are emerging as potential alternatives to this technique, not only in case of BVP failure, but also as a stand-alone first choice due to several potential advantages over traditional CRT. Specifically, due to its procedural characteristics, left bundle branch area pacing appears to be the most convincing technique, showing comparable efficacy outcomes when compared with traditional CRT, not increasing short-term device-related complications, as well as improving procedural times. However, transvenous leads remain a major limitation of all these pacing modalities. To overcome this limit, a leadless left ventricular endocardial pacing has been developed as an additional tool to achieve a left endocardial activation, although being still associated with non-negligible pitfalls, limiting its current use in clinical practice. This article focuses on the current state and latest progresses in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10132566
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101325662023-04-27 Cardiac resynchronization therapy: present and future Schiavone, Marco Arosio, Roberto Valenza, Simone Ruggiero, Diego Mitacchione, Gianfranco Lombardi, Leonida Viecca, Maurizio Forleo, Giovanni Battista Eur Heart J Suppl PLACE 2022 Supplement Paper Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) via biventricular pacing (BVP) is a well-established therapy for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and left bundle branch block, who remain symptomatic despite optimal medical therapy. Despite the long-standing clinical evidence, as well as the familiarity of cardiac electrophysiologists with the implantation technique, CRT via BVP cannot be achieved or may result ineffective in up to one-third of the patients. Therefore, new alternative techniques, such as conduction system pacing and left ventricular pacing, are emerging as potential alternatives to this technique, not only in case of BVP failure, but also as a stand-alone first choice due to several potential advantages over traditional CRT. Specifically, due to its procedural characteristics, left bundle branch area pacing appears to be the most convincing technique, showing comparable efficacy outcomes when compared with traditional CRT, not increasing short-term device-related complications, as well as improving procedural times. However, transvenous leads remain a major limitation of all these pacing modalities. To overcome this limit, a leadless left ventricular endocardial pacing has been developed as an additional tool to achieve a left endocardial activation, although being still associated with non-negligible pitfalls, limiting its current use in clinical practice. This article focuses on the current state and latest progresses in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Oxford University Press 2023-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10132566/ /pubmed/37125274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suad046 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle PLACE 2022 Supplement Paper
Schiavone, Marco
Arosio, Roberto
Valenza, Simone
Ruggiero, Diego
Mitacchione, Gianfranco
Lombardi, Leonida
Viecca, Maurizio
Forleo, Giovanni Battista
Cardiac resynchronization therapy: present and future
title Cardiac resynchronization therapy: present and future
title_full Cardiac resynchronization therapy: present and future
title_fullStr Cardiac resynchronization therapy: present and future
title_full_unstemmed Cardiac resynchronization therapy: present and future
title_short Cardiac resynchronization therapy: present and future
title_sort cardiac resynchronization therapy: present and future
topic PLACE 2022 Supplement Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10132566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37125274
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suad046
work_keys_str_mv AT schiavonemarco cardiacresynchronizationtherapypresentandfuture
AT arosioroberto cardiacresynchronizationtherapypresentandfuture
AT valenzasimone cardiacresynchronizationtherapypresentandfuture
AT ruggierodiego cardiacresynchronizationtherapypresentandfuture
AT mitacchionegianfranco cardiacresynchronizationtherapypresentandfuture
AT lombardileonida cardiacresynchronizationtherapypresentandfuture
AT vieccamaurizio cardiacresynchronizationtherapypresentandfuture
AT forleogiovannibattista cardiacresynchronizationtherapypresentandfuture