Cargando…
Cardiac resynchronization therapy: present and future
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) via biventricular pacing (BVP) is a well-established therapy for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and left bundle branch block, who remain symptomatic despite optimal medical therapy. Despite the long-standing clinical evidence, as we...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10132566/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37125274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suad046 |
_version_ | 1785031409150197760 |
---|---|
author | Schiavone, Marco Arosio, Roberto Valenza, Simone Ruggiero, Diego Mitacchione, Gianfranco Lombardi, Leonida Viecca, Maurizio Forleo, Giovanni Battista |
author_facet | Schiavone, Marco Arosio, Roberto Valenza, Simone Ruggiero, Diego Mitacchione, Gianfranco Lombardi, Leonida Viecca, Maurizio Forleo, Giovanni Battista |
author_sort | Schiavone, Marco |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) via biventricular pacing (BVP) is a well-established therapy for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and left bundle branch block, who remain symptomatic despite optimal medical therapy. Despite the long-standing clinical evidence, as well as the familiarity of cardiac electrophysiologists with the implantation technique, CRT via BVP cannot be achieved or may result ineffective in up to one-third of the patients. Therefore, new alternative techniques, such as conduction system pacing and left ventricular pacing, are emerging as potential alternatives to this technique, not only in case of BVP failure, but also as a stand-alone first choice due to several potential advantages over traditional CRT. Specifically, due to its procedural characteristics, left bundle branch area pacing appears to be the most convincing technique, showing comparable efficacy outcomes when compared with traditional CRT, not increasing short-term device-related complications, as well as improving procedural times. However, transvenous leads remain a major limitation of all these pacing modalities. To overcome this limit, a leadless left ventricular endocardial pacing has been developed as an additional tool to achieve a left endocardial activation, although being still associated with non-negligible pitfalls, limiting its current use in clinical practice. This article focuses on the current state and latest progresses in cardiac resynchronization therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10132566 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101325662023-04-27 Cardiac resynchronization therapy: present and future Schiavone, Marco Arosio, Roberto Valenza, Simone Ruggiero, Diego Mitacchione, Gianfranco Lombardi, Leonida Viecca, Maurizio Forleo, Giovanni Battista Eur Heart J Suppl PLACE 2022 Supplement Paper Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) via biventricular pacing (BVP) is a well-established therapy for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and left bundle branch block, who remain symptomatic despite optimal medical therapy. Despite the long-standing clinical evidence, as well as the familiarity of cardiac electrophysiologists with the implantation technique, CRT via BVP cannot be achieved or may result ineffective in up to one-third of the patients. Therefore, new alternative techniques, such as conduction system pacing and left ventricular pacing, are emerging as potential alternatives to this technique, not only in case of BVP failure, but also as a stand-alone first choice due to several potential advantages over traditional CRT. Specifically, due to its procedural characteristics, left bundle branch area pacing appears to be the most convincing technique, showing comparable efficacy outcomes when compared with traditional CRT, not increasing short-term device-related complications, as well as improving procedural times. However, transvenous leads remain a major limitation of all these pacing modalities. To overcome this limit, a leadless left ventricular endocardial pacing has been developed as an additional tool to achieve a left endocardial activation, although being still associated with non-negligible pitfalls, limiting its current use in clinical practice. This article focuses on the current state and latest progresses in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Oxford University Press 2023-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10132566/ /pubmed/37125274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suad046 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | PLACE 2022 Supplement Paper Schiavone, Marco Arosio, Roberto Valenza, Simone Ruggiero, Diego Mitacchione, Gianfranco Lombardi, Leonida Viecca, Maurizio Forleo, Giovanni Battista Cardiac resynchronization therapy: present and future |
title | Cardiac resynchronization therapy: present and future |
title_full | Cardiac resynchronization therapy: present and future |
title_fullStr | Cardiac resynchronization therapy: present and future |
title_full_unstemmed | Cardiac resynchronization therapy: present and future |
title_short | Cardiac resynchronization therapy: present and future |
title_sort | cardiac resynchronization therapy: present and future |
topic | PLACE 2022 Supplement Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10132566/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37125274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suad046 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schiavonemarco cardiacresynchronizationtherapypresentandfuture AT arosioroberto cardiacresynchronizationtherapypresentandfuture AT valenzasimone cardiacresynchronizationtherapypresentandfuture AT ruggierodiego cardiacresynchronizationtherapypresentandfuture AT mitacchionegianfranco cardiacresynchronizationtherapypresentandfuture AT lombardileonida cardiacresynchronizationtherapypresentandfuture AT vieccamaurizio cardiacresynchronizationtherapypresentandfuture AT forleogiovannibattista cardiacresynchronizationtherapypresentandfuture |