Cargando…

Alternative methods to measure breast density in younger women

BACKGROUND: Breast density is a strong and potentially modifiable breast cancer risk factor. Almost everything we know about breast density has been derived from mammography, and therefore, very little is known about breast density in younger women aged <40. This study examines the acceptability...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lloyd, Rachel, Pirikahu, Sarah, Walter, Jane, Cadby, Gemma, Darcey, Ellie, Perera, Dilukshi, Hickey, Martha, Saunders, Christobel, Karnowski, Karol, Sampson, David D., Shepherd, John, Lilge, Lothar, Stone, Jennifer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10133329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36828870
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-023-02201-5
_version_ 1785031546667794432
author Lloyd, Rachel
Pirikahu, Sarah
Walter, Jane
Cadby, Gemma
Darcey, Ellie
Perera, Dilukshi
Hickey, Martha
Saunders, Christobel
Karnowski, Karol
Sampson, David D.
Shepherd, John
Lilge, Lothar
Stone, Jennifer
author_facet Lloyd, Rachel
Pirikahu, Sarah
Walter, Jane
Cadby, Gemma
Darcey, Ellie
Perera, Dilukshi
Hickey, Martha
Saunders, Christobel
Karnowski, Karol
Sampson, David D.
Shepherd, John
Lilge, Lothar
Stone, Jennifer
author_sort Lloyd, Rachel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Breast density is a strong and potentially modifiable breast cancer risk factor. Almost everything we know about breast density has been derived from mammography, and therefore, very little is known about breast density in younger women aged <40. This study examines the acceptability and performance of two alternative breast density measures, Optical Breast Spectroscopy (OBS) and Dual X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA), in women aged 18–40. METHODS: Breast tissue composition (percent water, collagen, and lipid content) was measured in 539 women aged 18–40 using OBS. For a subset of 169 women, breast density was also measured via DXA (percent fibroglandular dense volume (%FGV), absolute dense volume (FGV), and non-dense volume (NFGV)). Acceptability of the measurement procedures was assessed using an adapted validated questionnaire. Performance was assessed by examining the correlation and agreement between the measures and their associations with known determinants of mammographic breast density. RESULTS: Over 93% of participants deemed OBS and DXA to be acceptable. The correlation between OBS-%water + collagen and %FGV was 0.48. Age and BMI were inversely associated with OBS-%water + collagen and %FGV and positively associated with OBS-%lipid and NFGV. CONCLUSIONS: OBS and DXA provide acceptable and viable alternative methods to measure breast density in younger women aged 18–40 years.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10133329
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101333292023-04-28 Alternative methods to measure breast density in younger women Lloyd, Rachel Pirikahu, Sarah Walter, Jane Cadby, Gemma Darcey, Ellie Perera, Dilukshi Hickey, Martha Saunders, Christobel Karnowski, Karol Sampson, David D. Shepherd, John Lilge, Lothar Stone, Jennifer Br J Cancer Article BACKGROUND: Breast density is a strong and potentially modifiable breast cancer risk factor. Almost everything we know about breast density has been derived from mammography, and therefore, very little is known about breast density in younger women aged <40. This study examines the acceptability and performance of two alternative breast density measures, Optical Breast Spectroscopy (OBS) and Dual X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA), in women aged 18–40. METHODS: Breast tissue composition (percent water, collagen, and lipid content) was measured in 539 women aged 18–40 using OBS. For a subset of 169 women, breast density was also measured via DXA (percent fibroglandular dense volume (%FGV), absolute dense volume (FGV), and non-dense volume (NFGV)). Acceptability of the measurement procedures was assessed using an adapted validated questionnaire. Performance was assessed by examining the correlation and agreement between the measures and their associations with known determinants of mammographic breast density. RESULTS: Over 93% of participants deemed OBS and DXA to be acceptable. The correlation between OBS-%water + collagen and %FGV was 0.48. Age and BMI were inversely associated with OBS-%water + collagen and %FGV and positively associated with OBS-%lipid and NFGV. CONCLUSIONS: OBS and DXA provide acceptable and viable alternative methods to measure breast density in younger women aged 18–40 years. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-02-24 2023-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10133329/ /pubmed/36828870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-023-02201-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Lloyd, Rachel
Pirikahu, Sarah
Walter, Jane
Cadby, Gemma
Darcey, Ellie
Perera, Dilukshi
Hickey, Martha
Saunders, Christobel
Karnowski, Karol
Sampson, David D.
Shepherd, John
Lilge, Lothar
Stone, Jennifer
Alternative methods to measure breast density in younger women
title Alternative methods to measure breast density in younger women
title_full Alternative methods to measure breast density in younger women
title_fullStr Alternative methods to measure breast density in younger women
title_full_unstemmed Alternative methods to measure breast density in younger women
title_short Alternative methods to measure breast density in younger women
title_sort alternative methods to measure breast density in younger women
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10133329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36828870
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-023-02201-5
work_keys_str_mv AT lloydrachel alternativemethodstomeasurebreastdensityinyoungerwomen
AT pirikahusarah alternativemethodstomeasurebreastdensityinyoungerwomen
AT walterjane alternativemethodstomeasurebreastdensityinyoungerwomen
AT cadbygemma alternativemethodstomeasurebreastdensityinyoungerwomen
AT darceyellie alternativemethodstomeasurebreastdensityinyoungerwomen
AT pereradilukshi alternativemethodstomeasurebreastdensityinyoungerwomen
AT hickeymartha alternativemethodstomeasurebreastdensityinyoungerwomen
AT saunderschristobel alternativemethodstomeasurebreastdensityinyoungerwomen
AT karnowskikarol alternativemethodstomeasurebreastdensityinyoungerwomen
AT sampsondavidd alternativemethodstomeasurebreastdensityinyoungerwomen
AT shepherdjohn alternativemethodstomeasurebreastdensityinyoungerwomen
AT lilgelothar alternativemethodstomeasurebreastdensityinyoungerwomen
AT stonejennifer alternativemethodstomeasurebreastdensityinyoungerwomen