Cargando…

Differences between living and deceased donation in human uterus transplantation: A narrative review

The decision to use a living or deceased donor to perform uterus transplantation (UTx) is an evaluation of benefit and harm and is based on the medical team's choices. The current study determines the differences between living and deceased donation in human UTx according to determinant factors...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Taherkhani, Sakineh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Knowledge E 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10133735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37122889
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v21i3.13195
_version_ 1785031621874810880
author Taherkhani, Sakineh
author_facet Taherkhani, Sakineh
author_sort Taherkhani, Sakineh
collection PubMed
description The decision to use a living or deceased donor to perform uterus transplantation (UTx) is an evaluation of benefit and harm and is based on the medical team's choices. The current study determines the differences between living and deceased donation in human UTx according to determinant factors in choosing the donor type. For this review study, the PubMed database was searched without time, language, and location limitations up to May 2022. From 113 identified articles, 45 papers were included in the study for review. According to the results, in comparison to living donation, the biggest advantage of deceased donation is the lack of surgical and or psychological risks for the donor. In contrast, a comprehensive pre-transplantation medical assessment is less possible in deceased donation, and preplanned surgery cannot be realized. According to published peer-reviewed clinical trials on UTx, the graft failure rates in living and deceased donor UTx are 21% and 36%, respectively. Supposing all recipients who did not have graft failure underwent embryo transfer, live birth rates in living and deceased donor UTx procedures are almost 63% and 71%, respectively. Currently, considering the occurrence of live births from both donations, particularly from nulliparous deceased donor, increased demand for UTx in the near future, shortage of uterus grafts, and lack of sufficient data for a comprehensive comparison between the 2 types of donation, the use of both donations still seems necessary and rational.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10133735
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Knowledge E
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101337352023-04-28 Differences between living and deceased donation in human uterus transplantation: A narrative review Taherkhani, Sakineh Int J Reprod Biomed Review Article The decision to use a living or deceased donor to perform uterus transplantation (UTx) is an evaluation of benefit and harm and is based on the medical team's choices. The current study determines the differences between living and deceased donation in human UTx according to determinant factors in choosing the donor type. For this review study, the PubMed database was searched without time, language, and location limitations up to May 2022. From 113 identified articles, 45 papers were included in the study for review. According to the results, in comparison to living donation, the biggest advantage of deceased donation is the lack of surgical and or psychological risks for the donor. In contrast, a comprehensive pre-transplantation medical assessment is less possible in deceased donation, and preplanned surgery cannot be realized. According to published peer-reviewed clinical trials on UTx, the graft failure rates in living and deceased donor UTx are 21% and 36%, respectively. Supposing all recipients who did not have graft failure underwent embryo transfer, live birth rates in living and deceased donor UTx procedures are almost 63% and 71%, respectively. Currently, considering the occurrence of live births from both donations, particularly from nulliparous deceased donor, increased demand for UTx in the near future, shortage of uterus grafts, and lack of sufficient data for a comprehensive comparison between the 2 types of donation, the use of both donations still seems necessary and rational. Knowledge E 2023-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10133735/ /pubmed/37122889 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v21i3.13195 Text en Copyright © 2023 Sakineh Taherkhani. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Taherkhani, Sakineh
Differences between living and deceased donation in human uterus transplantation: A narrative review
title Differences between living and deceased donation in human uterus transplantation: A narrative review
title_full Differences between living and deceased donation in human uterus transplantation: A narrative review
title_fullStr Differences between living and deceased donation in human uterus transplantation: A narrative review
title_full_unstemmed Differences between living and deceased donation in human uterus transplantation: A narrative review
title_short Differences between living and deceased donation in human uterus transplantation: A narrative review
title_sort differences between living and deceased donation in human uterus transplantation: a narrative review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10133735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37122889
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v21i3.13195
work_keys_str_mv AT taherkhanisakineh differencesbetweenlivinganddeceaseddonationinhumanuterustransplantationanarrativereview