Cargando…

Evaluating an app for digital medical history taking in urgent care practices: study protocol of the cluster-randomized interventional trial ‘DASI’

BACKGROUND: In out-of-hours urgent care practices in Germany, physicians of different specialties care for a large number of patients, most of all unknown to them, resulting in a high workload and challenging diagnostic decision-making. As there is no common patient file, physicians have no informat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Noack, Eva Maria, Zajontz, Dagmar, Friede, Tim, Antweiler, Kai, Hummers, Eva, Schmidt, Tobias, Roddewig, Lea, Schröder, Dominik, Müller, Frank
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10133907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37106447
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-023-02065-x
_version_ 1785031658314924032
author Noack, Eva Maria
Zajontz, Dagmar
Friede, Tim
Antweiler, Kai
Hummers, Eva
Schmidt, Tobias
Roddewig, Lea
Schröder, Dominik
Müller, Frank
author_facet Noack, Eva Maria
Zajontz, Dagmar
Friede, Tim
Antweiler, Kai
Hummers, Eva
Schmidt, Tobias
Roddewig, Lea
Schröder, Dominik
Müller, Frank
author_sort Noack, Eva Maria
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In out-of-hours urgent care practices in Germany, physicians of different specialties care for a large number of patients, most of all unknown to them, resulting in a high workload and challenging diagnostic decision-making. As there is no common patient file, physicians have no information about patients’ previous conditions or received treatments. In this setting, a digital tool for medical history taking could improve the quality of medical care. This study aims to implement and evaluate a software application (app) that takes a structured symptom-oriented medical history from patients in urgent care settings. METHODS: We conduct a time-cluster-randomized trial in two out-of-hours urgent care practices in Germany for 12 consecutive months. Each week during the study defines a cluster. We will compare participants with (intervention group) and without app use (control group) prior to consultation and provision of the self-reported information for the physician. We expect the app to improve diagnostic accuracy (primary outcome), reduce physicians’ perceived diagnostic uncertainty, and increase patients’ satisfaction and the satisfaction with communication of both physician and patient (secondary outcomes). DISCUSSION: While similar tools have only been subject to small-scale pilot studies surveying feasibility and usability, the present study uses a rigorous study design to measure outcomes that are directly associated with the quality of delivered care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (No. DRKS00026659 registered Nov 03 2021. World Health Organization Trial Registration Data Set, https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx? TrialID = DRKS00026659.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10133907
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101339072023-04-28 Evaluating an app for digital medical history taking in urgent care practices: study protocol of the cluster-randomized interventional trial ‘DASI’ Noack, Eva Maria Zajontz, Dagmar Friede, Tim Antweiler, Kai Hummers, Eva Schmidt, Tobias Roddewig, Lea Schröder, Dominik Müller, Frank BMC Prim Care Study Protocol BACKGROUND: In out-of-hours urgent care practices in Germany, physicians of different specialties care for a large number of patients, most of all unknown to them, resulting in a high workload and challenging diagnostic decision-making. As there is no common patient file, physicians have no information about patients’ previous conditions or received treatments. In this setting, a digital tool for medical history taking could improve the quality of medical care. This study aims to implement and evaluate a software application (app) that takes a structured symptom-oriented medical history from patients in urgent care settings. METHODS: We conduct a time-cluster-randomized trial in two out-of-hours urgent care practices in Germany for 12 consecutive months. Each week during the study defines a cluster. We will compare participants with (intervention group) and without app use (control group) prior to consultation and provision of the self-reported information for the physician. We expect the app to improve diagnostic accuracy (primary outcome), reduce physicians’ perceived diagnostic uncertainty, and increase patients’ satisfaction and the satisfaction with communication of both physician and patient (secondary outcomes). DISCUSSION: While similar tools have only been subject to small-scale pilot studies surveying feasibility and usability, the present study uses a rigorous study design to measure outcomes that are directly associated with the quality of delivered care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (No. DRKS00026659 registered Nov 03 2021. World Health Organization Trial Registration Data Set, https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx? TrialID = DRKS00026659. BioMed Central 2023-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10133907/ /pubmed/37106447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-023-02065-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Noack, Eva Maria
Zajontz, Dagmar
Friede, Tim
Antweiler, Kai
Hummers, Eva
Schmidt, Tobias
Roddewig, Lea
Schröder, Dominik
Müller, Frank
Evaluating an app for digital medical history taking in urgent care practices: study protocol of the cluster-randomized interventional trial ‘DASI’
title Evaluating an app for digital medical history taking in urgent care practices: study protocol of the cluster-randomized interventional trial ‘DASI’
title_full Evaluating an app for digital medical history taking in urgent care practices: study protocol of the cluster-randomized interventional trial ‘DASI’
title_fullStr Evaluating an app for digital medical history taking in urgent care practices: study protocol of the cluster-randomized interventional trial ‘DASI’
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating an app for digital medical history taking in urgent care practices: study protocol of the cluster-randomized interventional trial ‘DASI’
title_short Evaluating an app for digital medical history taking in urgent care practices: study protocol of the cluster-randomized interventional trial ‘DASI’
title_sort evaluating an app for digital medical history taking in urgent care practices: study protocol of the cluster-randomized interventional trial ‘dasi’
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10133907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37106447
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-023-02065-x
work_keys_str_mv AT noackevamaria evaluatinganappfordigitalmedicalhistorytakinginurgentcarepracticesstudyprotocoloftheclusterrandomizedinterventionaltrialdasi
AT zajontzdagmar evaluatinganappfordigitalmedicalhistorytakinginurgentcarepracticesstudyprotocoloftheclusterrandomizedinterventionaltrialdasi
AT friedetim evaluatinganappfordigitalmedicalhistorytakinginurgentcarepracticesstudyprotocoloftheclusterrandomizedinterventionaltrialdasi
AT antweilerkai evaluatinganappfordigitalmedicalhistorytakinginurgentcarepracticesstudyprotocoloftheclusterrandomizedinterventionaltrialdasi
AT hummerseva evaluatinganappfordigitalmedicalhistorytakinginurgentcarepracticesstudyprotocoloftheclusterrandomizedinterventionaltrialdasi
AT schmidttobias evaluatinganappfordigitalmedicalhistorytakinginurgentcarepracticesstudyprotocoloftheclusterrandomizedinterventionaltrialdasi
AT roddewiglea evaluatinganappfordigitalmedicalhistorytakinginurgentcarepracticesstudyprotocoloftheclusterrandomizedinterventionaltrialdasi
AT schroderdominik evaluatinganappfordigitalmedicalhistorytakinginurgentcarepracticesstudyprotocoloftheclusterrandomizedinterventionaltrialdasi
AT mullerfrank evaluatinganappfordigitalmedicalhistorytakinginurgentcarepracticesstudyprotocoloftheclusterrandomizedinterventionaltrialdasi