Cargando…
Evaluating an app for digital medical history taking in urgent care practices: study protocol of the cluster-randomized interventional trial ‘DASI’
BACKGROUND: In out-of-hours urgent care practices in Germany, physicians of different specialties care for a large number of patients, most of all unknown to them, resulting in a high workload and challenging diagnostic decision-making. As there is no common patient file, physicians have no informat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10133907/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37106447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-023-02065-x |
_version_ | 1785031658314924032 |
---|---|
author | Noack, Eva Maria Zajontz, Dagmar Friede, Tim Antweiler, Kai Hummers, Eva Schmidt, Tobias Roddewig, Lea Schröder, Dominik Müller, Frank |
author_facet | Noack, Eva Maria Zajontz, Dagmar Friede, Tim Antweiler, Kai Hummers, Eva Schmidt, Tobias Roddewig, Lea Schröder, Dominik Müller, Frank |
author_sort | Noack, Eva Maria |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In out-of-hours urgent care practices in Germany, physicians of different specialties care for a large number of patients, most of all unknown to them, resulting in a high workload and challenging diagnostic decision-making. As there is no common patient file, physicians have no information about patients’ previous conditions or received treatments. In this setting, a digital tool for medical history taking could improve the quality of medical care. This study aims to implement and evaluate a software application (app) that takes a structured symptom-oriented medical history from patients in urgent care settings. METHODS: We conduct a time-cluster-randomized trial in two out-of-hours urgent care practices in Germany for 12 consecutive months. Each week during the study defines a cluster. We will compare participants with (intervention group) and without app use (control group) prior to consultation and provision of the self-reported information for the physician. We expect the app to improve diagnostic accuracy (primary outcome), reduce physicians’ perceived diagnostic uncertainty, and increase patients’ satisfaction and the satisfaction with communication of both physician and patient (secondary outcomes). DISCUSSION: While similar tools have only been subject to small-scale pilot studies surveying feasibility and usability, the present study uses a rigorous study design to measure outcomes that are directly associated with the quality of delivered care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (No. DRKS00026659 registered Nov 03 2021. World Health Organization Trial Registration Data Set, https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx? TrialID = DRKS00026659. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10133907 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101339072023-04-28 Evaluating an app for digital medical history taking in urgent care practices: study protocol of the cluster-randomized interventional trial ‘DASI’ Noack, Eva Maria Zajontz, Dagmar Friede, Tim Antweiler, Kai Hummers, Eva Schmidt, Tobias Roddewig, Lea Schröder, Dominik Müller, Frank BMC Prim Care Study Protocol BACKGROUND: In out-of-hours urgent care practices in Germany, physicians of different specialties care for a large number of patients, most of all unknown to them, resulting in a high workload and challenging diagnostic decision-making. As there is no common patient file, physicians have no information about patients’ previous conditions or received treatments. In this setting, a digital tool for medical history taking could improve the quality of medical care. This study aims to implement and evaluate a software application (app) that takes a structured symptom-oriented medical history from patients in urgent care settings. METHODS: We conduct a time-cluster-randomized trial in two out-of-hours urgent care practices in Germany for 12 consecutive months. Each week during the study defines a cluster. We will compare participants with (intervention group) and without app use (control group) prior to consultation and provision of the self-reported information for the physician. We expect the app to improve diagnostic accuracy (primary outcome), reduce physicians’ perceived diagnostic uncertainty, and increase patients’ satisfaction and the satisfaction with communication of both physician and patient (secondary outcomes). DISCUSSION: While similar tools have only been subject to small-scale pilot studies surveying feasibility and usability, the present study uses a rigorous study design to measure outcomes that are directly associated with the quality of delivered care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (No. DRKS00026659 registered Nov 03 2021. World Health Organization Trial Registration Data Set, https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx? TrialID = DRKS00026659. BioMed Central 2023-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10133907/ /pubmed/37106447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-023-02065-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Noack, Eva Maria Zajontz, Dagmar Friede, Tim Antweiler, Kai Hummers, Eva Schmidt, Tobias Roddewig, Lea Schröder, Dominik Müller, Frank Evaluating an app for digital medical history taking in urgent care practices: study protocol of the cluster-randomized interventional trial ‘DASI’ |
title | Evaluating an app for digital medical history taking in urgent care practices: study protocol of the cluster-randomized interventional trial ‘DASI’ |
title_full | Evaluating an app for digital medical history taking in urgent care practices: study protocol of the cluster-randomized interventional trial ‘DASI’ |
title_fullStr | Evaluating an app for digital medical history taking in urgent care practices: study protocol of the cluster-randomized interventional trial ‘DASI’ |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating an app for digital medical history taking in urgent care practices: study protocol of the cluster-randomized interventional trial ‘DASI’ |
title_short | Evaluating an app for digital medical history taking in urgent care practices: study protocol of the cluster-randomized interventional trial ‘DASI’ |
title_sort | evaluating an app for digital medical history taking in urgent care practices: study protocol of the cluster-randomized interventional trial ‘dasi’ |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10133907/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37106447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-023-02065-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT noackevamaria evaluatinganappfordigitalmedicalhistorytakinginurgentcarepracticesstudyprotocoloftheclusterrandomizedinterventionaltrialdasi AT zajontzdagmar evaluatinganappfordigitalmedicalhistorytakinginurgentcarepracticesstudyprotocoloftheclusterrandomizedinterventionaltrialdasi AT friedetim evaluatinganappfordigitalmedicalhistorytakinginurgentcarepracticesstudyprotocoloftheclusterrandomizedinterventionaltrialdasi AT antweilerkai evaluatinganappfordigitalmedicalhistorytakinginurgentcarepracticesstudyprotocoloftheclusterrandomizedinterventionaltrialdasi AT hummerseva evaluatinganappfordigitalmedicalhistorytakinginurgentcarepracticesstudyprotocoloftheclusterrandomizedinterventionaltrialdasi AT schmidttobias evaluatinganappfordigitalmedicalhistorytakinginurgentcarepracticesstudyprotocoloftheclusterrandomizedinterventionaltrialdasi AT roddewiglea evaluatinganappfordigitalmedicalhistorytakinginurgentcarepracticesstudyprotocoloftheclusterrandomizedinterventionaltrialdasi AT schroderdominik evaluatinganappfordigitalmedicalhistorytakinginurgentcarepracticesstudyprotocoloftheclusterrandomizedinterventionaltrialdasi AT mullerfrank evaluatinganappfordigitalmedicalhistorytakinginurgentcarepracticesstudyprotocoloftheclusterrandomizedinterventionaltrialdasi |