Cargando…

Cost-Effectiveness of Remote Cardiac Monitoring With the CardioMEMS Heart Failure System: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Heart Failure (HF) imposes a relevant burden and a considerable health concern, with high prevalence and mortality rates. This study was conducted to assess the cost-effectiveness of remote cardiac monitoring with the CardioMEMS Heart Failure System. METHODS: In the present systematic re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Azari, Samad, Mousavi, Seyed Hosein, Markazi Moghaddam, Nader, Rezapour, Aziz, Zargar Balaye Jame, Sanaz, Kolivand, Pirhossein, Sarabi Asiabar, Ali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Iran University of Medical Sciences 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37123330
http://dx.doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.37.16
_version_ 1785031684301783040
author Azari, Samad
Mousavi, Seyed Hosein
Markazi Moghaddam, Nader
Rezapour, Aziz
Zargar Balaye Jame, Sanaz
Kolivand, Pirhossein
Sarabi Asiabar, Ali
author_facet Azari, Samad
Mousavi, Seyed Hosein
Markazi Moghaddam, Nader
Rezapour, Aziz
Zargar Balaye Jame, Sanaz
Kolivand, Pirhossein
Sarabi Asiabar, Ali
author_sort Azari, Samad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Heart Failure (HF) imposes a relevant burden and a considerable health concern, with high prevalence and mortality rates. This study was conducted to assess the cost-effectiveness of remote cardiac monitoring with the CardioMEMS Heart Failure System. METHODS: In the present systematic review, several scholarly databases were searched and updated from inception up to September 20, 2022. The objective of the present review was formulated according to the patient/population, intervention, comparison and outcomes format. Mortality rate, hospitalization rate, quality-adjusted life year (QALY), total costs, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio regarding the use of the CardioMEMS System were the key outcomes of the present study. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS) checklist. RESULTS: Finally, 5 articles were retained and analyzed in the present systematic review. All studies employed the Markov and decision tree models. Results show that the CardioMEMS system reduced mortality and hospitalization rate and created a higher QALY. In all selected countries the CardioMEMS method is a more expensive method than the standard of care (SoC), with the highest cost in the United States (US) ($201,437) and the lowest cost in the United Kingdom ($25,963), respectively. the highest willingness to pay in the US and the lowest in Italy ($100,000 and $33,000 per QALY), respectively. Results showed that the most cost per QALY for the CardioMEMS system was in the US and the lowest was in the Netherlands ($46,622 and $26,615 per QALY), respectively. CONCLUSION: In all selected countries, CardioMEMS is a cost-effective method for monitoring and managing pulmonary artery pressures in HF patients. Strategies such as CardioMEMS, which decrease the rate of hospitalization, are likely to be only more cost-effective in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10134092
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Iran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101340922023-04-28 Cost-Effectiveness of Remote Cardiac Monitoring With the CardioMEMS Heart Failure System: A Systematic Review Azari, Samad Mousavi, Seyed Hosein Markazi Moghaddam, Nader Rezapour, Aziz Zargar Balaye Jame, Sanaz Kolivand, Pirhossein Sarabi Asiabar, Ali Med J Islam Repub Iran Original Article BACKGROUND: Heart Failure (HF) imposes a relevant burden and a considerable health concern, with high prevalence and mortality rates. This study was conducted to assess the cost-effectiveness of remote cardiac monitoring with the CardioMEMS Heart Failure System. METHODS: In the present systematic review, several scholarly databases were searched and updated from inception up to September 20, 2022. The objective of the present review was formulated according to the patient/population, intervention, comparison and outcomes format. Mortality rate, hospitalization rate, quality-adjusted life year (QALY), total costs, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio regarding the use of the CardioMEMS System were the key outcomes of the present study. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS) checklist. RESULTS: Finally, 5 articles were retained and analyzed in the present systematic review. All studies employed the Markov and decision tree models. Results show that the CardioMEMS system reduced mortality and hospitalization rate and created a higher QALY. In all selected countries the CardioMEMS method is a more expensive method than the standard of care (SoC), with the highest cost in the United States (US) ($201,437) and the lowest cost in the United Kingdom ($25,963), respectively. the highest willingness to pay in the US and the lowest in Italy ($100,000 and $33,000 per QALY), respectively. Results showed that the most cost per QALY for the CardioMEMS system was in the US and the lowest was in the Netherlands ($46,622 and $26,615 per QALY), respectively. CONCLUSION: In all selected countries, CardioMEMS is a cost-effective method for monitoring and managing pulmonary artery pressures in HF patients. Strategies such as CardioMEMS, which decrease the rate of hospitalization, are likely to be only more cost-effective in the future. Iran University of Medical Sciences 2023-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10134092/ /pubmed/37123330 http://dx.doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.37.16 Text en © 2023 Iran University of Medical Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/1.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial-ShareAlike 1.0 License (CC BY-NC-SA 1.0), which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
spellingShingle Original Article
Azari, Samad
Mousavi, Seyed Hosein
Markazi Moghaddam, Nader
Rezapour, Aziz
Zargar Balaye Jame, Sanaz
Kolivand, Pirhossein
Sarabi Asiabar, Ali
Cost-Effectiveness of Remote Cardiac Monitoring With the CardioMEMS Heart Failure System: A Systematic Review
title Cost-Effectiveness of Remote Cardiac Monitoring With the CardioMEMS Heart Failure System: A Systematic Review
title_full Cost-Effectiveness of Remote Cardiac Monitoring With the CardioMEMS Heart Failure System: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Cost-Effectiveness of Remote Cardiac Monitoring With the CardioMEMS Heart Failure System: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Cost-Effectiveness of Remote Cardiac Monitoring With the CardioMEMS Heart Failure System: A Systematic Review
title_short Cost-Effectiveness of Remote Cardiac Monitoring With the CardioMEMS Heart Failure System: A Systematic Review
title_sort cost-effectiveness of remote cardiac monitoring with the cardiomems heart failure system: a systematic review
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37123330
http://dx.doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.37.16
work_keys_str_mv AT azarisamad costeffectivenessofremotecardiacmonitoringwiththecardiomemsheartfailuresystemasystematicreview
AT mousaviseyedhosein costeffectivenessofremotecardiacmonitoringwiththecardiomemsheartfailuresystemasystematicreview
AT markazimoghaddamnader costeffectivenessofremotecardiacmonitoringwiththecardiomemsheartfailuresystemasystematicreview
AT rezapouraziz costeffectivenessofremotecardiacmonitoringwiththecardiomemsheartfailuresystemasystematicreview
AT zargarbalayejamesanaz costeffectivenessofremotecardiacmonitoringwiththecardiomemsheartfailuresystemasystematicreview
AT kolivandpirhossein costeffectivenessofremotecardiacmonitoringwiththecardiomemsheartfailuresystemasystematicreview
AT sarabiasiabarali costeffectivenessofremotecardiacmonitoringwiththecardiomemsheartfailuresystemasystematicreview